Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that.   
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
    • urm.. i seem to recall another assault case whereby the approved bailiff company claimed the body camera was nor theirs but a pers one of the bailiff, i think they got in serious trouble for it. i believe that breaks certain gov't approval for a bailiff company/firm regulations/laws  if memory serves me right?
    • have a look at  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/451423-pra-letter-of-claim-old-barclaycard-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5256506 the docs in this thread are what you should get. if the agreement the correct date for signup and does the PRA or BC cover letter use the word reconstructed? dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCJ Asent solicitors on behalf of claremont private hospital - they say was not us?


h83hor
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2640 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI this is very weird.

I have just looked at my credit file

 

 

I have a CCJ from Asent solicitors on behalf of claremont private hospital.

I was given this information by the county court.

 

 

I advised I was aware of no debt,

they advised it was sent to my old address and that they knew I didn’t live there as bailiffs confirmed the house was derelict.

As I used BUPA when at this hospital they had full access to my current details through BUPA.

 

However;

I contacted the solicitor who filed for the CCJ to explain their error,

they cannot find any details for me or a CCJ against me filed by them???

 

 

I have asked for them to confirm this in writing, they have advised they will investigate further and get back to me.

 

What should I do?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I were you I would send them an email confirming that they have no knowledge of any judgement against you. Then call them and tell them that in the circumstances you will be applying for a set-aside and will they consent.

 

Follow the set-aside link for further information or alternatively you can find more information about obtaining a set-aside in our new Consumer Survival Handbook which is available on Amazon

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you know what the CCJ was for?

if the sols are confirming they know nowt

and they have searched the claim number you gave them..

 

 

..surely if they are the named solicitor

they should be removing it by consent and it shouldnt cost you a penny?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spoken to the county court and they have advised me that the solicitors can apply to have it set aside and would cost them only 100 pounds!! (which seems a bit of a swiz!! why would it cost me 250!)

 

 

im going to call the solicitors back at the end of the week and if they still cannot find my details;

I am going to demand they have it put aside or contact the ombudsman.

 

 

I'll let you know what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spoken to the county court and they have advised me that the solicitors can apply to have it set aside and would cost them only 100 pounds!! (which seems a bit of a swiz!! why would it cost me 250!) Because there would have to be a hearing for you as defendant...the claimant can make application without hearing.

 

 

im going to call the solicitors back at the end of the week and if they still cannot find my details;

I am going to demand they have it put aside or contact the ombudsman.

 

 

I'll let you know what happens.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok so they finally found the details,

the hospital had given them a totally different address which is my parents address,

 

I sent a email requesting put aside,

they have refused as they say they had responsibility to get my new address from bupa

even thought they knew I wasnt at the address,

 

they have managed to get my parents address for no known reason????

 

looks like my only choice ti to apply to have set aside, but what are my chances of winning???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to General Legal Issues.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

In very simple terms

, if you have a reasonable prospect of defending the claim then your chances of setting the CCJ aside increase,

 

if the Judgment is set aside,

you'll most likely be asked to file a Defence to the claim.

 

Do you know anything about the original debt?

You said you were with BUPA (private health insurance?) at the time of the hopsital stay

- so were you aware that you might be charged or were BUPA supposed to cover any bills?

 

If you don't have a reasonable prospect of defending the claim,

the Court probably won't set judgement aside

(despite the clear issues with service of the claim)

 

- what would be the point of setting aside Judgment,

only for the case to go through the entire litigation process culminating in a trial,

only for Judgment to be entered against you again 6 months down the line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I havent got a problem paying the money, I advised them if it is set aside I will make payment, I just dont want a CCJ on my credit file for 6 years.

 

I have not lived at my parents address for years and certainly not since I attended the hosiptal.

 

the CCJ was registered at my old address though.

 

I was very Ill, not diagnosed by this hospital, they refuse to give me prices so I was not aware it would exceed BUPA funding. I was given CCJ in Feb 16, which is when I finally had my operation to cure the problem.

 

Bupa were updated when I moved, as I was refered to this hospital via bupa, I presumed they would deal with them direct. I didnt go to the hospital of my own choice, so why would I think I need to update my deatils with them when I moved. I notified all relevant parties, such as bupa?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I am hoping someone can help with a defence,

 

 

I have unfortunately been ill whilst pregnant and unable to continue with the claim until now.

 

 

as I have been on sick pay couldn't afford the fee to have set aside

but really need this sorting as with a baby on the way we are looking to buy a property and this CCJ is going to cause issues.

 

I am now wanting to defend on the points I have raised above,

pay the outstanding amount immediately

and then I will make a claim against Claremont regarding the poor medical treatment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you managed to set it a side?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am hoping someone can help with a defence, I have unfortunately been ill whilst pregnant and unable to continue with the claim until now. as I have been on sick pay couldn't afford the fee to have set aside but really need this sorting as with a baby on the way we are looking to buy a property and this CCJ is going to cause issues.

 

I am now wanting to defend on the points I have raised above, pay the outstanding amount immediately and then I will make a claim against Claremont regarding the poor medical treatment.

 

 

You may be less likely to get a set aside now.

Any application for set aside needed to be made "promptly".

The claimant might say that you shouldn't be granted the set-aside for not acting promptly: less of an issue if they agree a set aside by consent .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not had it set aside yet as I need to now put in a defence.

 

 

the CCJ was submitted in FEB 16,

I was not aware until OCT 16 that I even had a CCJ??

and it took their solicitors a while to even find the details of my CCJ.

 

 

As I have explained I am pregnant and have had severe medical issues,

obviously the health of my unborn child had to take priority.

 

 

I am hoping that any court would understand that???

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not had it set aside yet as I need to now put in a defence. the CCJ was submitted in FEB 16, I was not aware until OCT 16 that I even had a CCJ?? and it took their solicitors a while to even find the details of my CCJ. As I have explained I am pregnant and have had severe medical issues, obviously the health of my unborn child had to take priority. I am hoping that any court would understand that???

 

Afraid not...all application to set a side should made promptly...the longer its left...the less chance of success....unless as stated you get the judgment claimant to agree by consent.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Defendant obviously...are you sure you should be taking this on given you dont know the difference ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were me, i would keep it simple.

 

Firstly you are applying to set aside the judgement having only heard about the CCJ in October 2016, as the claimant served the claim to an address you don't reside at or have ever provided. In regard to the delay in applying for the set aside from October, the claimants Solicitor could not find details of the claim and that you have beem suffering from ill health, as well as being pregnant.

 

Secondly, you were never advised by the claimant of the cost of the service they were providing in advance and they failed to invoice you for their services. Therefore, you were not aware whether the cover held with BUPA covered the costs of services provided. You therefore believe the claimant has failed to undertake pre action protocols in actually sending an invoice to an address where the defendant was resident.

 

If you want help, you need to be a bit more understanding that people who contribute to this site volunteer their time to the site trying to help people. I think you need to sit down and write down a longer explanation of the exact circumstances in a chronological order. Then add the details to the thread and ask for help. More detail is needed about the contract with the Hospital and to what extent BUPA were involved. Did BUPA have the information about actual costs to send to you, but never did ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...