Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
    • I'm not sure that I fully agree with my site team colleague above.  My understanding is that there is nothing to stop you recording but it is strictly for your own personal use.   
    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I’m dismantling a van as scrap but it has a wheel clamp attached to it – suggestions?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6005 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Another clamper turned up! I went out and approached him and he showed me his ID and explained who he was & was polite at all times. He was from the DVLA and clamping this van for having no tax.

 

The van he clamped is out of service awaiting repairs. Its owner is a local chap who does man & van work and has been experiencing financial difficulty.

 

P5310005.jpg

 

This creates more questions.

 

1. A van is a tool of someone’s trade and in this case is awaiting repair. Can the DVLA still disable the vehicle and thereby obstruct its repair and prevent him to continue trading?

 

2. The owner seems to be in a catch-22. He couldn’t afford the repairs needed to get its MOT, therefore could not get it taxed, and he had no off street parking to store it. With these new MOT/tax/SORN rules, how could have worked around this without being clamped for no tax?

 

3. The owner says he can no longer trade and will now sign on unemployed. He also now wants to scrap the vehicle as a write off because he can no longer afford to run it and has his family to feed – so – he says I can take it. Can I just take the van and dismantle it and just tell DVLA to collect their wheel clamp with the wheel still inside it? Or has the ownership of the van now passed to DVLA and it’s no longer the original owners property to give to me?

 

Interesting anatomy of the wheel clamp, it wouldn’t be hard getting this one off with a Rolson 42in Tungsten Bolt cutter.

 

P5310009.jpg

P5310010.jpg

P5310008.jpg

P5310006.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001

The OP has made that the owner is a man with a van business, this is called Hire and Reward, so hiring a van is not an option because H&R is excluded in rental vehicle agreements.

 

Borrowing a van is easier said than done.

 

Answers:

 

1. Its a trade vehicle and he can ask the DVLA for his financial losses by virtue he is obstructed from repairing his vehicle, this will likely be done in the small claims track. He will have to sign on and pay the DVLA fine in instalments to keep bailiff away.

 

2. No way round, an untaxed vehicle must be off public roads.

 

3. You can take the vehicle and dismantle it but you must let the DVLA have their clamp back undamaged, just ring them up and let them come and collect it. You must get the V5 from the original owner, if the DVLA come back in the meantime and take the van then the owner must write on the V5 "GIVEN TO DVLA AS SCRAP". Remove the other three wheels and put it up on bricks for now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By law you should not strip it down on the side of the public highway, but there's nothing to stop you moving it to another location if you don't damage the clamp in the process. So......

 

If you're a mechanic you should have access to a decent trolly jack.

 

Jack up the front end, then just lower it onto a dolly and tow it away.....

 

:D

 

BTW, that clamp will come off dead easy. If you deflate the tyre almost completely, and disconnect the flexi brake lines, you'll be able to carefully roll the van forward out of the clamp.

Nil Illigitimus Carborundum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001

Jack up the front end, then just lower it onto a dolly and tow it away.....

 

That is not how a clamped vehicle is transported.

 

This has been done before where a friend had a parked vehicle on her business property with permission and it was later clamped by DVLA, the driver allowed her to scrap the vehicle because the fine -v- vehicle cost was disproportionate and it was now causing an obstruction. The property was a restaurant parking area and she allowed neighbours to park outside business hours.

 

A scrapper will winch it up onto a flatbed and the clamp just rotates with the wheel until its chains become wrapped around the axle.

 

The scrapper must return the empty clamp to the spot where the vehicle was originally parked so DVLA can collect it within 28 days. Tell the council and they'll clear it as rubbish because its now a public hazzard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, in theory, you could (illegally) cut the clamp off, drive/tow the vehicle away, phone the council about the clamp being a hazzard in the road, but not actually leave it there, council comes to collect, finds it missing........ assumes someone/kids has "had it away"

 

You have "proof" that you left the clamp there for collection.... phone call to council..... what can DVLA do ?? you did what you are legally required to do, and they can't prove otherwise. They also can't prove that you damaged the clamp as they don't have it.

 

Hmmmm, naughty :rolleyes:

Nil Illigitimus Carborundum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001

He cannot cut the clamp, besides its made from high tensile steel.

 

If he did cut it off then he could face a charge of criminal damage, but that probably wont stick in a criminal proceeding because its DVLA's word against the defendant, and nobody whth an ounce of sanity will testify they saw him damage a wheel clamp.

 

A TV program once featured a man cutting off a wheelclamp in the middle of a high street to see the reaction of the public.

 

This YouTube video along with this one shows drivers trying to remove wheel clamps. Plenty more videos where these came from.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know of a lady who also took a clamp from her car and went to her local police station to tell them what she had done.

 

The police informed her that it was a "CIVIL MATTER" and suggested that she should write to the bailiff company to say that the clamp was available for collection and that it was undamaged !!!!

 

( This was about 2 months ago and was in the London area).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001
maybe more people should do what this lady did ;)

 

Interesting a Judge says the bailiff cannot lawfully enter the property by force.

That judge should educate Superintendent Sharon Bush of Surrey Police who begs to differ.

forcedentry.JPG

 

Yes this letter is dismissing a complaint against two police officers who passed off breaking & entering and criminal damage by a bailiff as a being "civil matter" while he enforcing a parking ticket (which later turned out to be invalid anyway).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi setmefree:)

 

I had read all posts, before I posted.

 

I was only trying to protect CAG from possible accusations. :o

 

I will seek another view on my comments, however, to ensure I was not being over zealous. If I was, I apologise in advance. :)

 

I do appreciate, and added in that post, that the comment was perhaps made in fun! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kennythecelt i realise that you were protecting CAG, and by no means was my post a personal dig at yourself.

What i was trying to get through is that D.V.L.A staff would have guidelines in respect to fitting a wheel clamp, and i'm sure that if they were aware that the above fitted clamp chain could in fact become a danger to the public i.e. a trip hazard,and that any person would have a valid claim against them,then they would have to re look at the way that the chain is secured.

As regards to my earlier post about moving the chain, then yes the remark could be classed as instigating an accident, to which i'm sorry, but other remarks on this thread could also be classed as instigating an unauthorised act.

No bad Feelings.:)

Setmefree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to removing a D.V.L.A. clamp i would imagine that it would be a criminal act on the terms that D.V.L.A. have the powers to crush the vehicle in the case that the outstanding fine is not paid.

This suggests that D.V.L.A. own the vehicle from the time the vehicle is clamped until the fine is paid.(I could be wrong) any views..

Link to post
Share on other sites

DVLA can clamp a vehicle for not having a valid tax disc. The vehicle is normally located using ANPR equipped vehicles in conjunction with NCP Ltd

 

The release fee is £80 and a valid tax disc must be produced when you pick up the vehicle. As this in normally impossible, a surety must be paid of £120 for a car or motorcylce or £600 for other vehicles. The money is returned to you when you produce the tax disc.

 

If you do not produce a tax disc within 2 weeks you lose the surety and the car will be clamped again.

 

The car will only stay at the location for a day or so before being towed. The fee is £160 and storage of £15 per day.

 

REMOVING THE CLAMP.

 

It is not a criminal offence to remove a wheel clamp from a private car park. In the case of DVLA however it is a criminal offence. The maximum fine is £1,000 but very few cases are ever prosecuted.

 

 

For a start, it would not be easy to get a prosecution off the ground as it would be difficult to prove beyond reasonable doubt who committed the offence, particularly if there were no witnesses.

 

It could not be assumed that the registered keeper removed the clamp as very often third parties offer their help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

REMOVING THE CLAMP.

 

In the case of DVLA however it is a criminal offence. The maximum fine is £1,000 but very few cases are ever prosecuted.

 

Thank you tomtubby for that info, this is why i state that other remarks concerning the removal of a D.V.L.A. clamp should also be questioned, whils't as you quite correctly have stated any third party could have removed the clamp so it would be hard to prove,the fact still remains that the earlier post is indeed telling how to remove the clamp from this specific vehicle, which CAG would also not condone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DVLA can clamp a vehicle for not having a valid tax disc. The vehicle is normally located using ANPR equipped vehicles in conjunction with NCP Ltd.

 

Apparently is was the local council that reported it untaxed. A council officer was seen on camera looking it over.

 

The release fee is £80 and a valid tax disc must be produced when you pick up the vehicle. As this in normally impossible, a surety must be paid of £120 for a car or motorcylce or £600 for other vehicles. The money is returned to you when you produce the tax disc.

 

If you do not produce a tax disc within 2 weeks you lose the surety and the car will be clamped again.

 

To get a replacement tax it needs an MOT, the driver cannot get an MOT because he is skint, he is caught-22.

 

Why does DVLA need to see tax discs when they already control the database of taxed vehicles. Something doesn't sound right.

 

Forcing the low-income comminity to stump up cash like this only increases the crime rate.

 

 

The car will only stay at the location for a day or so before being towed. The fee is £160 and storage of £15 per day.

 

That fits, during the night the van had a CLAMPBUSTERS sticker placed on it and the small-print bit says: (off top of my head)

 

Clamped?

 

 

Remove the remaining wheels

and place a locking wheel nut on stub

then jack the vehicle down on bricks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If your car is clamped and someone nicks its wheels in the meantime

then it stops the vehicle being towed or lifted away undamaged

and enables you to claim for a replacement vehicle from the clampers

liability insurer

 

 

 

Another useful tip from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

CLAMPBUSTERS

CLAMPING DOWN ON CLAMPERS

 

 

 

 

I'll try and get a scanned copy of the sticker, it's quite funny.

 

 

 

REMOVING THE CLAMP.

 

It is not a criminal offence to remove a wheel clamp from a private car park. In the case of DVLA however it is a criminal offence. The maximum fine is £1,000 but very few cases are ever prosecuted.

 

 

For a start, it would not be easy to get a prosecution off the ground as it would be difficult to prove beyond reasonable doubt who committed the offence, particularly if there were no witnesses.

 

It could not be assumed that the registered keeper removed the clamp as very often third parties offer their help.

 

Read up, theres is a policeman's letter indicating there is such thing as civil damage, its criminal damage when the police are covering their own ends when they have clearly screwed up when they give the age old its-a-civil matter excuse to a report of criminal damage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...