Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sainsburys Overtime unpaid


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4695 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure of all the details but I will speak to her. My friend at my works daughter works at Sainsbury's and has a set amount of hours a week. She was told to come in this day and that day etc and by the end of the month she had worked more than her set hours. Sainsburys response was that she was only contracted to those set hours and so they will not be paying her any extra.

 

Surely this isn't fair?

Help me to help others!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not just not fair, it doesn't sound right.

 

Can you find out more? There is no way you can be asked to do extra hours and not get paid for them, or at least not in an environment where you are paid an hourly rate.

 

Maybe she misunderstood, and they said they wouldn't pay her overtime rate? (which they can do if the hours worked are still below the full-time number of hours.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try and get some clarity on this.

 

I worked for Sainsburys years ago when I was a student and they were fabulous to work for. In fact, the best employers I ever worked for.

Nothing was too much trouble and their employee interests were always put first.

 

It could be just a misunderstanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a employee of sainsburys too many years to bother counting, but happy with the employer, as for any over time, employees are contracted to work set hrs per month, myself 37.5 or 150 per month, this amount of hours has to be worked and not enclude sickness before the over time rate kicks in so to speak,lets say if i work 140 hrs and 10 hrs sick, total 150 and work 15 hrs over time, then i would recieve 10 hours at normal rate and 5 hrs at over time rate, sainsburys staff receive 13 payment dates per year as we are on 4 weekly pay, and are contracted on set hrs which differ dependant on which area of work, ie store/suppy chain/etc and of course area. but all employees are entitled to over time, but the contracted hours per month have to be worked 1st. Bank holidays etc are paid at time and half and double time dependant on when the holidays are. There are some but not many stores that still have overtime hours banked, this enables staff to have the time off at a time to suit them and hence won't get paid overtime rate but get maybe a extra few days off during the month, unless by the month end hours are still in credit then the hours will be paid in overtime, sainsburys hours and pay struture change from store to store or supply chain to supply chain and so forth, the union on site will be able to give your friend all the informtion she/he needs to work out there hours and pay. Failing that, HR will be more than happy to explain any questions that might need answering.

!2 years Tesco distribution supervisor

7 years Sainsburys Transport Manager

 

4 Years housing officer ( Lettings )

Partner... 23 Years social services depts

 

All advice is given through own opition, also by seeking/searching info on behalf of poster, and own personnel dealings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try and get some clarity on this.

 

I worked for Sainsburys years ago when I was a student and they were fabulous to work for. In fact, the best employers I ever worked for.

Nothing was too much trouble and their employee interests were always put first.

 

It could be just a misunderstanding.

 

My daughter worked for them about a year ago and their employee care was crap.

 

16 year old on a till all day and not allowed even a toilet break - and not just my daughter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My daughter worked for them about a year ago and their employee care was crap.

 

16 year old on a till all day and not allowed even a toilet break - and not just my daughter.

 

 

Well, to stop somebody going to the toilet is just crazy.

 

They were fabulous to me. Swapping shifts and time off at short notice, plenty of overtime, heavily subsidised canteen with great food, excellent training, good rates of pay, new uniform every 6 months and realistic promotion if I decided to stay.

 

Far better than some employments I've had.

 

Just lucky I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
My daughter worked for them about a year ago and their employee care was crap.

 

16 year old on a till all day and not allowed even a toilet break - and not just my daughter.

 

Someones telling porky pies here.

 

Working time regulations state:

 

a 30-minute in-work rest break when working longer than four and a half hours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just because she's entitled to it doesn't mean she's getting it, employers seem to "forget" about these laws as I've learned recently (6 hours + night shift without a break, 10 hours once with only a 10 minute toilet break).

Any posts submitted here on the Consumer Action Group under the user name GlasweJen may not necessarily be the view of the poster, CAG or indeed any normal person.

 

I've become addicted to green blobs (I have 2 now) so feel free to tip my scales if I ever make sense.;-)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Robert,

you have a legal entitlement to be paid for all hours worked in excess of your contractual hours. She should ask the manager to put their decision in writing. If they are not prepared to do this then she should put her request in writing and keep a copy of her letter. If she heres nothing then she should raise a formal grievance against her manager. There will normally be 3 stages to this procedure and a copy of it will be available fro the Human resources department.

There are 3 Trade Unions recognised by Sainsburys, the best being Home (ok I'm biased) but even if there is not one at her store she still has the legal right to be represented so if she is a member she should contact them for advice, assistance and representation.

In relation to breaks the basic legal minimum is 20 minutes in a shift that lasts more than 6 hours although hopefully most of you will get far better than that?

 

I hope this is useful?

 

Best regards,

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

just because she's entitled to it doesn't mean she's getting it, employers seem to "forget" about these laws as I've learned recently (6 hours + night shift without a break, 10 hours once with only a 10 minute toilet break).

 

Employers don't 'forget', they know the law but some of them don't bother to enforce it unless you ask.

No job - and I mean NO job is worth risking your health over. Employers don't employ you out of pity, they employ you to help them make a profit, and for no other reason, but, on the other hand, you don't go to work for the fun of it. You work so that you can feed your family and pay the bills and for no other reason. The days of slavery have long gone and no-one should put up with blatant disregard for the laws of employment.

Never be afraid of the boss, ask him/her directly when you should take your break.

 

The regulations for under 18s are:

 

a limit of eight hours working time a day and 40 hours a week

 

not to work between 10pm and 6am or between 11pm and 7am (except in certain circumstances)

 

12 hours' rest between each working day

 

two days' weekly rest and a 30-minute in-work rest break when working longer than four and a half hours.

 

These are your rights, insist on them.

 

If your employer will not agree to them then you are within your rights to walk out and take them to an industrial tribunal claiming constructive dismissal. You do not have to have a qualifiying year under your belt either for breaches in the working time regulations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Someones telling porky pies here.

 

Working time regulations state:

 

a 30-minute in-work rest break when working longer than four and a half hours.

 

No Conniff, I am not lying.

 

It was busy and the supervisors did not want to shut tills down. Add to that the standard response of "hang on a minute and I'll get someone to relieve you" and then going away and being distracted.

 

Yes we all have rights - it's just that in the real world, it is not always easy to enforce them - especially when you are only 16.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pat

 

I used to be 16 (sometime in the last century I think) and I know how daunting bosses can seem, but they are in general only human and can make errors or get distracted, remember though they used to be 16 at one time as well.

Ding your little bell the next time and ask "did you forget my break".

 

Breaks don't have to be half way through a shift, but they cannot be tagged on to the front or the end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pat

 

I used to be 16 (sometime in the last century I think) and I know how daunting bosses can seem, but they are in general only human and can make errors or get distracted, remember though they used to be 16 at one time as well.

Ding your little bell the next time and ask "did you forget my break".

 

Breaks don't have to be half way through a shift, but they cannot be tagged on to the front or the end.

 

This was my daughter and the same thing happened to 2 friends of hers.

 

For a young girl in her first part-time job, it's very difficult to stand up to adult supervisors (don't forget the major adult/child interaction at that age - other than parents - is with teachers, with whom argument is not encouraged)

 

As it was a very busy period, I suspect that the problem was that the lane would have needed to be shut, rather than another member of staff substituted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

I am also an employee of sainsbury on a part time basis for the past three months and have a question. On signing my contract I was told that time and a half and double time payments were no longer being offered on a Sunday which on the face of it is fair enough if they are phasing this pay out entirely. However, I have recently discovered that some staff are paid double time on a sunday others are paid time and a half and some are paid the normal rate all for exactly the same work. Surely this is discriminating against newer employees?

 

Any advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they can pay different people on different contracts different amounts. When a new pay deal is brought in with large companies, it often means lower pay for new employees but existing employees pay/allowances are usually protected.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

I am also an employee of sainsbury on a part time basis for the past three months and have a question. On signing my contract I was told that time and a half and double time payments were no longer being offered on a Sunday which on the face of it is fair enough if they are phasing this pay out entirely. However, I have recently discovered that some staff are paid double time on a sunday others are paid time and a half and some are paid the normal rate all for exactly the same work. Surely this is discriminating against newer employees?

 

Any advice would be appreciated.

 

When the Sunday Trading Act came in the only way that many stores could get people to work on a Sunday was to offer enhanced rates of pay, with Sunday traditionally being a day of rest. As time moved on and it became clear that Sunday trading was here to stay then these premiums have been reduced as staff recruitment has become easier - Sunday (sadly in some respects) has become just another day. Understandably one person's contract cannot be changed to cut their pay if their original deal was to receive an enhancement, but somebody applying for a job nowadays which includes Sunday working can be paid the going rate for the job. Over time, stores have been able to recruit staff without offering more pay as an incentive.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

on the face of it they may have covered themselves by informing you when you signed your contract, however if the contract still states that you receive enhancements then you have a case as they should have issued an updated version.

You may also have a case for claiming equal pay if someone of the opposite sex is being paid more than you for doing the same job. Why not ask other newer employees if they are being paid overtime rates?

If there is a Union in your store and you are a member ask the Union Rep for advice. Even if there isn't one you can still join as an individual.

 

Regards,

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
I'm not sure of all the details but I will speak to her. My friend at my works daughter works at Sainsbury's and has a set amount of hours a week. She was told to come in this day and that day etc and by the end of the month she had worked more than her set hours. Sainsburys response was that she was only contracted to those set hours and so they will not be paying her any extra.

 

Surely this isn't fair?

 

Yep it isnt fair. Sainsburys is not the problem though, - the problem is the staff. The branch i work in are full of terrible heads that do what they like, racism included. These ones mislead you in order to get you fired if they dont like you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...