Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mercers keep ringing me...what should I do?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5892 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Mazel,

 

sorry, my last post was a bit to vague! Have a look at this thread:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/106562-make-digital-signature.html?highlight=signature

 

As Duffers Mum pointed out most likely all they hold on you is a pre contractual application form, in which case the debt is most likely unenforcable. Have a read of the thread above and use digital signatures from now on. If they are stupid enough to try and scan it on an agreement you'll know as soon as you see it, then they really are in troube!

 

regards,

shane

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shane,

 

Thanks for your reply. When I sent the original cca request in I used a digital signature. But now they say that I have to send in a signed authorisation letter. Should I send in another letter authorizing them to send me the info but agin use a digital signature?

Link to post
Share on other sites

simply a stalling tactic by barclays. Sometimes creditors even ask for photocopies of passports / utility bills! Pathetic.

 

You could always sign it in a slightly different manner. Like for eg, if you don't usually use ur middle name then put that in, something like that. As long as you can clearly identify it differs from your actual original signature.

 

Or you could just wait till the 12 days are up and send the cca non compliance letter and stop paying them till they do provide it.

 

regards,

shane

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get someone else to sign the letter, adding your name with pp before it underneath their signature.Secretaries do this for their bosses all the time. If Barclaycard insist you actually sign the letter, tell them you suffer from arthritis and can't write at the moment.:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep , too true, you dont have to provide them a signature however , they do have to provide you a true copy of the executed agreement.

 

i cant understand why these companies cant get it right. we understand the law why dont they

Link to post
Share on other sites

pt - Because they like to think we are stupid, sadly for them, we're not! Barclaycard are a nightmare to deal with, they know exactly what they have to send, but most of the time they also know they haven't got the correct document. I've yet to read of anybody on here who has actually received the proper CCA from them, yet Barclaycard still pass it out to DCAs, carry on charging interest and insisting what they've sent is the correct thing. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

personally, i would write back to them pointing out that the CCA 1974 does not require you to provide them a signed letter before they are required to comply with your request.

The CCA 1974 through

Consumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations 1983 requires that they send you the true copy of the executed agreement within 12 working days. i would tell them that you will not send them anything with your signature on it unless they can tell you what law requires you to provide them this info

 

plain and simple

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is nothing which says they need your signature, this is just a ploy to get you to send them it.

 

the law does not require a signature as a means of identification, you only need to look at a passport to see that, its accepted as id but you don't sign it. also no signature on a birth certificate but its accepted as id

 

i would ask them why they expressly want your signature. i bet they wont produce a valid reason, also if the claim for data protection then they are talking out of their bottoms as the Data Protection Act 1998 allows them to establish that they are sending the data to the correct person, however, to establish identity does not mean that you have to give them your signature. it is established that a utility bill and a copy of a passport will suffice in these circumstances and neither has your signature on them so dont let them fob you off with that line

 

just to add: i would also point out that they have not stipulated Data protection as the reason for this request, instead they have quoted the CCA 1974 which doesnot have any reference to you providing them with signed authorisation

 

good luck

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

In order for us to disclose information and to continue processing your request we will require your signed authorisation
.....

 

ha ha ha ha, sorry I just couldn't resist that after looking at there letter again, asking me to send them in my signed authorisation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I have received a letter from Credit Solutions heading 'Formal Demand'. They say they are acting as agents for Barclaycard.

 

I presume that I should send a letter to this lot telling them that the account is in dispute as my request for the CCA has not been dealt with by Barclaycard. Is this correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to send this letter to Credit Solutions, should I add anything else?

I do not acknowledge any debt to your company

A legal request for my Consumer Credit Agreement (Consumer Credit Act, 1974) was sent to Barclaycard by Recorded Delivery, on xxxxx and signed for on xxxxx. Until such times as they are able to comply with this request, the account remains in dispute, is unenforceable and no payments will be forthcoming.

Any further attempts to pursue me for payment on a disputed account will be reported to the relevant authorities without further notice.

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mazel01

 

how about

 

Dear Sirs

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to your company

 

 

A legal request for my Consumer Credit Agreement (Consumer Credit Act, 1974) was sent to Barclaycard by Recorded Delivery, on xxxxx and signed for on xxxxx.. The document requested should have been supplied within 12 working days as laid down in theConsumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations 1983. the 12 working days expired on xx/xx/2007 and as such the account entered into a default situation under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the debt is presently unenforceable . Until such times as they are able to comply with this request, the account remains in dispute and no payments will be forthcoming.

 

Since this account is clearly in dispute, you should cease all collection activity until the dispute is resolved. The Office of Fair Trading Guidance on debt collection clearly defines what the Office of Fair Trading consider unfair practices and should you ignore this correspondence and pursue me for this debt you will be in breach of the Office of Fair Trading guidance, for the avoidance of any doubt I have listed the relevant sections below ( Taken from the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance,Final Guidance On Unfair Business Practies, July 2003. Updated December 2006)

 

2.6 h. ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are Disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment”

 

 

“2.8 k. not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt “

 

 

Any further attempts to pursue me for payment on a disputed account will be reported to Trading Standards, the Financial Ombudsman Service and the Office of Fair Trading without further notice.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

 

regards

 

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mazel

 

PT (and I'd like to think a few others:Dare doing our best to help you.

 

I've just sent a PM to PT with a couple of very minor suggestions, as I don't think their publication of the thread would necessarily help your cause.

 

Please remember my mantra "one for all and all for one" (I've got a couple more but not releveant here:)

 

Good luck

 

Vandermerwe

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

No i dont think so, however, what i added merely puts them on notice that you are well informed as to your position(and theirs) and that you wont take no fob off or any other such nonsense

 

they will be aware that you know the legislation thatthey are likely to quote and that you are also aware of the Office Of Fair Trading and other such enforcement authorities.

 

thats all i was thinking

 

Regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...