Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

walton v rbos


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4869 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This has got to be the best thread on the forum. Reckon cag (with Pauls permission) should sell the story once it's finished to Hollywood and you can both share the proceeds. Twists, turns, secrets and conspiracy, reckon Daniel Craig would be pretty interested :D.

 

RBS need exposing, keep up the good work!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

LOL emandcole.

 

RBS will more than likely want a cut aswell so we might not bother. Then again we might do if we have worked into there contracts that all there cut has to go to CAG and they have to lose the data re paul, sparkie and debbbsy and give them back every penny they have paid them remove and co and ccjs from there records and disclose all router data and admit to fraud.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul,

 

You may not be a regular reader of the FT, but there is an important article this morning. The headline reads:

 

 

RBS book left fears of illegality unresolved

 

Taxpayers who have stumped up billions of pounds to bail out Royal Bank of Scotland might be alarmed to discover that a proportion of the assets they are supporting may have been exposed to legal irregularities such as fraud.

 

There is a link to a letter from Sir Nicholas Macpherson the senior civil servant at the Treasury to the Chancellor, which is worth a read.

LetterMacphersonChancellor031109.pdf

Edited by dad
Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be all well and good if it was a private organisation but heck...it's not! WE own it, not that we were given any choice about buying such a dud.

 

Can't see how they can keep this one quiet and given the fact that the press might just actually do something useful with their time let's hope this story is pursued and highlighted as it's certainly of public interest. Bankers are creating a whole new level of public enemy with this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wowzers! what a state for a bank to be in...

 

They took fractional reserve banking systems and appear to have modified to use with debts to invent book debts more than the actual value, obviously these "assets" did not really exist except to inflate the companies results each year.

 

The directors involved should be stripped of all assets/pensions etc, this wasnt some small town bank manager making this decision, it was at the top of the tree and cascaded down.

 

As to not being able to find any way to tell legal from illegal assets, I suspect the shredders have been going non-stop since the protection scheme was announced :-(

 

Shame on RBS and shame on the multiple governments for not protecting people and removing the banking controls that had ensured some limited protection beforehand.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

RBS said the scheme was agreed after “exhaustive due diligence work by the government and their advisers. There is no information or evidence to suggest that any of the assets are legally irregular.”

 

 

Hmmm are they sure ;-)

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RBS said the scheme was agreed after “exhaustive due diligence work by the government and their advisers. There is no information or evidence to suggest that any of the assets are legally irregular.”

 

there you go guys you have a very very credible witness in sir nicholas Mc pherson,,,bring the case to Mr Darling and Mr Browns doorstep for Condoning Iregularities and allowing known false accounting practices to be acceptable to the financial industry it should be nipped in the bud and the treasury select committee ought to be asking more questions by bringin rbs excecs and darling to face their questions..

patrickq1

i could go on and on but joe public would nt be allowed this to go on so why should darling subscribe to fraudulent transactions outside the law

Link to post
Share on other sites

THose members who have a copy of my DVD have another look at it ....I and told the Mr Brown the PM what was going on in 2007...I got a letter back from his saying my letter all my docs would be passed to the Treasury who would answer on his behalf..........I say on my DVD that I never got a reply from the treasury and that I thought they had brushed it all "under the mat".......It appears that one person at least at the Treasury took my letter, documents and claims seriously....of False Assetts, False Acounting and Fraud

 

 

sparkie

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes sparkie at least the fuse has been lit i am writing to J.McPHEE MP and going to ask why the treasury select committee are allowing this false accounting to continue and why is Sir Nick Mc Pherson not brought before them to answer what he has discovered and bring DARLING MOVE OVER to account for burying this mess which in itself is an attempt to mis lead parliment and the public from gross fraudulent accounts...why have the serious fraud squad not acted on information sent to them,has their been collusion there it all needs to be investigated and heads should roll also big prison sentances should follow....you cannot forever condone such a massive fraud

imo

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes sparkie at least the fuse has been lit i am writing to J.McPHEE MP and going to ask why the treasury select committee are allowing this false accounting to continue and why is Sir Nick Mc Pherson not brought before them to answer what he has discovered and bring DARLING MOVE OVER to account for burying this mess which in itself is an attempt to mis lead parliment and the public from gross fraudulent accounts...why have the serious fraud squad not acted on information sent to them,has their been collusion there it all needs to be investigated and heads should roll also big prison sentances should follow....you cannot forever condone such a massive fraud

imo

patrickq1

 

 

HI Patrick,

 

As Paul Knows I can advise that Cheshire Police have a copy of my DVD and are studying it.

 

sparkie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also i think That Sir fred needs to be brought to account over this and have his pension and settlement cut big time.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We cannot read the article:

 

"You have viewed your 30 days allowance of 1 free article. If you wish to view more, you can register for free by clicking on the button below".

 

 

If you Google 'Financial Times' and search for 'Royal Bank of Scotland' the article will come up in the results.:)

 

Els

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also i think That Sir fred needs to be brought to account over this and have his pension and settlement cut big time.

 

my settlement for him includes the use of the words "testicles, plate and cut"

 

In any other jurisdiction he would be in jail already, but here the lily livered government and its advisor actually signed off his massive extra pension instead.

 

It makes me mad beyond words that he sails off into the the sunset, secures employment with that showboating bunch of cowboys - RMJM Architects and nobody is held accountable for the mess he presided over. Amazing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparkie and myself (and others) have been liaising with a whistleblower regarding RBSs behavior on the continent - I recently received an anonymous email advising me not to take this guy seriously.....Interesting.

 

Paul

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

THose members who have a copy of my DVD have another look at it ....I and told the Mr Brown the PM what was going on in 2007...I got a letter back from his saying my letter all my docs would be passed to the Treasury who would answer on his behalf..........I say on my DVD that I never got a reply from the treasury and that I thought they had brushed it all "under the mat".......It appears that one person at least at the Treasury took my letter, documents and claims seriously....of False Assetts, False Acounting and Fraud

 

I was remembering that part of your DVD as I was reading this.

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone else see the article in the Glasgow Herald 15th Feb noting that three senior staff have quit RBS' investment business?

Interesting that one is walking into job with Morgan Stanley, and its highly unlikely the others will be collecting dole money, these guys never jump without a parachute.

 

Perhaps the squeeze on bonuses is having some effect then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sparkie and myself (and others) have been liaising with a whistleblower regarding RBSs behavior on the continent - I recently received an anonymous email advising me not to take this guy seriously.....Interesting.Paul

 

Interesting in that it was anonymous; they knew your email addy;

the email contents itself or something else?

 

If you still have the email, you can dig a bit into who sent it by looking at the full headers and then doing a Whois? from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...