Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Letter needed for Black Horse


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6067 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, my son is being chased by Black Horse and other DCAs. They all persist in leaving messages on my telephone or with me, in spite of the fact that for months he's repeatedly asked them not to and to ring him on his mobile. Some have complied, but Black Horse have phoned yet again and left a message, stating who they are and who they want to speak to. Is there a strongly worded letter he can send regarding data protection issues? Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that louiboy. The call frequency isn't too bad, what I was really wondering about was how to stop BH giving information to all and sundry, despite repeated requests not to. The phone is mine, in my name. My son lives in another part of the house, he had his own landline. Then he had that disconnected and went to mobile instead. Somehow BH discovered my phone number and began ringing me to leave messages for my son, and in the process they reveal more information than they legally ought to. Other DCAs guilty as well.

 

Also, thanks for the link to your Black Horse thread. Wow. My head was swirling just reading it! Such a lot to take in, but very well done. You played a blinder. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just adapt the harassment letter to fit your needs. Add a line that they have 14 days to confirm in writing your phone number is removed from the database. If they don't comply report then to Trading Standards and the Information commissioners Office. Black Horse have already attracted the attention of the Office of Fair Trade.

 

Here's a letter to stop processing your information under s10 and 12 Data Protection Act 1998.

 

Statutory Notice pursuant to Sections 10 and 12

Data Protection Act 1998

 

 

Data Subject Notice

 

 

 

 

The Data Controller

Black Horse Limited

Compliance & Admin

116 Cockfosters Road

Barnet

EN4 0DY

 

Data Subject: Name

 

Address: xxxxxxxx xxxxxx x x xxxx

 

Recently it has been brought to my attention that Black Horse Ltd have been processing and passing my personal information to third parties. I have never provided consent (written or implied) to Black Horse Ltd to process any personal information or data. At no time have I consented to the processing of that data in a manner which would be unfair or inaccurate or which would in any way would breach the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

Therefore, take notice that I require that you cease from processing within twenty one days of the receipt by you of this Notice, or else that you do not begin to process any personal data of which I am the subject insofar as that processing involves the communication or passing of personal data of which I am the subject to any third party and insofar as the said data relates wholly or in part to the implementation by you of alleged contractual breaches or breaches contrary to Common Law.

 

This Notice is given on the grounds that the processing or continued processing by you of the said data will be likely to affect my reputation and cause substantial damage and/or substantial distress to me and my family members in addition to that which has been caused to date. And that as the processing of the said data in the way referred to in this Notice would violate both the Principles and Data Subject’s rights of The Data Protection Act 1998, to do so would be both unwarranted and unlawful.

 

Signed

 

 

 

Mr xxxxxxx

 

Dated this xxth day of xxxxxxxx in the year two thousand and seven

I should have finished with Black Horse properly in 1999. Made an offer to settle the account and they never responded. 7 years later they reappeared. This time I intent to make sure that business is finished permanently.

He didn't come looking for trouble, but trouble came looking for him.

When the smoke clears, it just means he's reloading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found this very useful piece of information in louiboy's thread, which was posted by sparkie 1723...

 

Lloyds Tsb bought Chartered Trust in Dec 2000, They then set up Black Horse Ltd who the registered with Companies House in July 2001 and "took over " all Chartered Trusts business thats quite legal, but what they didn't do was register with the Information Commissioners Office as a Data Processor, they used Charted trusts registration BUT thats Illegal and a crimainal offence under the Data Protection Act licenses are NOT transferrable. They used this license until Sept 2001 and the they registered as Black Horse Ltd to process data BUT they gave the wrong office address so they were registerd incorrectly and did not notify the Information Commissioners Office of the change until Nov 2006. again an offence under the Data Protection Act failing to notify changes within 28 days of the change.

They are at Last registered correctly but any data they passed about anyone until 2006 has been unlawfully supplied and claims can be made against Black Horse for unblawfully supplying data and that includes Credit Reference agencies. Any one who has had a default registered by Black Horse during this time can write to the Agencises and Demend they remove them and give them these reasons demand it under section 10 of the Data Protection Act.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/47286-black-horse-me-outside-2.html

------------------------

 

My son's loan with them began in about '98-'99. How can he use this information to his advantage? I'm already going to CCA them on son's behalf, can I drop an extra little nugget into the letter? ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found this very useful piece of information in louiboy's thread, which was posted by sparkie 1723...

 

Lloyds Tsb bought Chartered Trust in Dec 2000, They then set up Black Horse Ltd who the registered with Companies House in July 2001 and "took over " all Chartered Trusts business thats quite legal, but what they didn't do was register with the Information Commissioners Office as a Data Processor, they used Charted trusts registration BUT thats Illegal and a crimainal offence under the Data Protection Act licenses are NOT transferrable. They used this license until Sept 2001 and the they registered as Black Horse Ltd to process data BUT they gave the wrong office address so they were registerd incorrectly and did not notify the Information Commissioners Office of the change until Nov 2006. again an offence under the Data Protection Act failing to notify changes within 28 days of the change.

 

They are at Last registered correctly but any data they passed about anyone until 2006 has been unlawfully supplied and claims can be made against Black Horse for unblawfully supplying data and that includes Credit Reference agencies. Any one who has had a default registered by Black Horse during this time can write to the Agencises and Demend they remove them and give them these reasons demand it under section 10 of the Data Protection Act.

 

Black Horse and Me outside now.

---------------------------------

---------------------------------

 

My son's loan with them began in about '98-'99. How can he use this information to his advantage? I'm going to CCA them on son's behalf, can I drop an extra little nugget into the letter? ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the moment stick with the standard CCA/SAR and see what it turns up.

 

I assume you have read the whole of Louiboy's thread as there is some excellent information there.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Son CCAd Black Horse and received a copy of his credit agreement this morning, which I expected as the loan was a fairly recent one.

 

But, he has been a customer of theirs for some years so could somebody just confirm that the next step is an SAR request to find out about charges? Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

My son sent an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to Black Horse in July, requesting a complete list of transactions and charges relating to his loan history with them ( approx. 8 years?) . They have now replied -

 

'We have recently received a number of letters all worded exactly the same as that received from you, where the prime purpose behind requesting a copy of the information we hold seems to be to dispute the additional charges applied to an account.

 

We are aware of the recent instruction from OFT in relation to additional charges incurred through late, missed or unpaid payments, however, this instruction relates only to charges incurred against credit card agreement debts. As our agreement with you is not such an agreement, the instruction from OFT does not apply.

 

If the purpose of your request is to dispute additional charges incurred, whilst we are happy to provide a copy of the information we hold, the production of such information will not serve any real purpose in detailing when and why the additional charges have been incurred.

 

In order to show the transactions against your account, I have arranged for a statement to be sent to you. Whilst the statement will show repayments received, it will not show the additional charges incurred, unless your agreement with us is complete or charges have been paid previously in which case these will be shown as debits on the statement.

 

(* *Here they list several collection activity fees that have been incurred recently but which haven't yet been debited to the account.)

 

(Letter continues...)

 

I have also returned your £10 as there is no fee for this information and statement. If however when you receive the statement you still requite a copy of all the information we hold, please return the £10 to us and we will arrange for this to be sent to you.

 

I hope the statement and breakdown of additional charges is of assistance and satisfies your query.

 

END

--

 

 

Well, of course it doesn't satisfy his query, so back will go the £10 but can anybody help me with a written response?

 

Can he rightfully request a breakdown of charges going back over several years? Any advice gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update. I sent an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) in July, got a reply from them questiong why I wanted the information. (See above.) I then sent a 2nd SAR:

 

Dear BH

I sent a letter in July and enclosed a £10 postal order for a Subject Access Request, as is my right under the Data Protection Act.

 

I have been waiting for you to supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my loan history with your organisation, within the 40 days stipulated under the Data Protection Act. It is your legal obligation to comply with this request, butas yet I have not received the requested information.

 

By not supplying the information I requested you are breaching my rights under the Data Protection Act, section 5.

 

This is my second request. Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my loan history with your organisation. Alternatively, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable. I again enclose the £10 fee.

 

If I do not receive the requested information within the next seven days, I will forward copies of my requests to the Information Commissioner. Please note, failure to comply will cause you to be in breach of the Sixth Data Protection Principle and liable to compensation to myself, together with a fine of up to £5000.

 

Any further protractions on your part in this matter and a formal request to the Data Protection Supervisor will be made to undertake an assessment of the information you have on my behalf.

 

Please find enclosed a copy of my original letter.

 

---------------------

 

They haven't responded to the SAR, but they did write and say 'thank you for requesting a settlement figure and a copy of your statement.....'

 

 

Very frustrating, this is the 2nd time they've responded like this.

 

What would my next step be? All advice gratefully received. Thanks! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

do wat i did with barclay card, take them to court and chuck £30 on for your costs and waisted time.

 

they soon came up with the S.A.R :)

If my advice has been helpful please feel free to click on my scales :grin:

 

Creditors and DCAs - Letter Templates & Budget Planner (CCA request letter N)and other templates)

 

Debt Collection Agencies & Statutory Demands, a few strategies

 

Abbey charges, Won

B-card non-disclosure of S.A.R, WON £30 costs awarded

B-Card, court for harrasement, failed to defend WON £175 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/125554-28-days-later-no.html#post1422508

B-Card charges, partial refund, still fighting

Vanquis-Cabot, GIVEN UP :lol:

HFC & my mum, no brainer, no CCA http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/133330-hfc-my-mum.html#post1404514

 

PLEASE donate to CAG however small. They are fighting for YOUR rights as a consumer. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Update. BH are so tedious. Got another letter from them at beginning of Sept enclosing a load of screenshots etc. It is quite evident they are being pedantic and write 'I take it you want a full Data SAR?

 

As I had already headed my previous letters 'Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request' I couldn't really put it any plainer.

 

So a 3rd attempt will be going in the post this weekend. Meanwhile, my son has since been notified that they have served a default notice on him.

 

Can he request its removal whilst all this hassle is going on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...