Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see below for an extract from the letter more about my case.    You have been convicted of two matters of failing to give driver details linked to two speeding offences and been disqualified in your absence. You confirmed that you did not receive the court documentation and the first you knew about the cases was on 3/6/24. As you can make a statutory declaration it is possible that we will be able to persuade the police to accept pleas to either or both of the speeding offences as they were committed within a very short space of time and withdraw the two fail to give driver details offences as normally if you plead to one or other of the speeding or fail to give driver details the prosecution will withdraw the other related offence. If successful you would not face a totting ban. In respect of the speeding offences, it could be argued they were committed on one occasion due to the proximity of the time and location and we may be able to persuade the prosecution to drop one of the speeding offences. You are technically guilty of all the offences because you accept it was you driving when the speeding offences were committed and that you did not update your change of address with the leasing company when it was your responsibility. If the prosecution will not withdraw the two failures to give driver details offences, you will face a totting ban but will be able to put forward an exceptional hardship argument. This may or may not go ahead at the court hearing date, so we need to prepare for all eventualities. As a safeguard we have lodged the appeal and applied to suspend your ban pending appeal due to the time limit for being able to automatically appeal without getting leave of the Judge. The court have dealt with the matter very quickly and have actually listed your matter for an application to suspend the disqualification pending appeal on the above-mentioned date. We could actually use this date to make the statutory declaration in court having explained the situation to the magistrates and then see if the prosecution will agree to accept pleas to one or both of the speeding offences as a way of resolving the matter without the need for you to put forward an exceptional hardship argument. It is possible the case would need to be adjourned so that we can make those representations, or the court may want to go ahead and hear the exceptional hardship argument. The outcome of your case is always at the discretion of the Court.  
    • Hi,    I will look over your case shortly.   I am sorry for the delay.
    • Judges are now loaded and they are both deputies 😕
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are MBNA in default of YOUR cca request?


redsue
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3882 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

and i would complain about all the deletions and insist that they have not complied

 

they are OBLIGED to provide all the information they hold about you

 

clearly these are files relating solely to you and you are entitled to know the bits that have been blanked out

 

i would write and insist on a complete record

 

some of it is CLEARLY about you for it can be deduced that what has been removed in one instance is the ohone number that they called you on

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 299
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I agree with Citizen B. Although the Banking Code is not a regulatory document it has enough standing in terms of being recognised that the FOS will say well they are only abiding by the code in terms of what it allows them to do. Your only option is legal and that too would be a tough case to argue until such time as the Code is defunct and incorporated in legislation. Moreover, you'd be open to costs. I'd just wait the 6 years out.

 

The bigger question is whether if they subsequently issued a formal DN they could start the clock ticking on the 6 years again. I don't believe they could as the 6 years is not enshrined in law either, it's just an informal agreement between the CRAs and the ICO as to what is reasonable. In terms of information processing no further event would have taken place that was the result of an action by you in that time if they did issue the formal DN. Therefore it would be tough for a CRA to argue to start the clock again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I think I may have the answer to your Default Notice and the reason why you can't find it for your account number.

 

MBNA serve a letter of intention as you've quite rightly said under the ridiculous guise of the Banking Code :confused:- why only MBNA knows as they issue agreements under the CCA 1974 and are Consumer Credit Licence holders. The reason why you can't find a copy of the DN is because if you don't respond to the letter of intention (which they unlawfully rely upon to register a default), they Charge Off the account (allegedly for tax purposes anyone!) and they change the account number - take a close look at any DN from MBNA anyone has received and you will find the No's do not match! They then serve their own peculiar version of a compliant DN i.e asking for the whole amount, not giving 'not less than 14 days' etc under Section 87 of the CCA where they state that they've already registered the default etc etc. Normally their ploy is before this 'default notice' expires they sell this 'newly numbered' debt to a DCA for more money! MBNA legal team are complete buffoons who do not seem to know their a*se from their elbows!

 

If you have experienced this cr:evil:p from MBNA - please contact Alison Nuttall who is the Chester Trading Standards Enforcement Officer who is responsible for MBNA's compliance. Apparently she is totally unaware (genuinely) that all of us out in the real world are having problems with MBNA and she would love to hear from you BUT she will take the issues and complaints seriously.She is literally looking in to these issues now - so please DO contact her now - the more evidence against MBNA the better the result!

 

You can e-mail her on:

 

[email protected]

 

And yes MBNA trolls if you're reading this - yes it is me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've tried the route of Chester Trading Standards about 3 years ago and they forced MBNA's hand to supply me with a clear copy of the agreement (got loads of prescribed terms missing!) I thought the general consensus was that TS and MBNA were all in bed together having cosy chats once a week with tea and biscuits - the last thing I want is MBNA to slap me with an 'official' DN as I'm 3 years in to the supposed one.

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • 2 years later...

Hi all

 

Just over 6 years ago,

I asked MBNA for a copy of my CC agreement plus terms & conditions I signed up for in 1993 for my Girobank CC.

 

After months of them messing about, and sending various T&Cs of what I 'could' have signed up for,

they admitted they did not have the original T&Cs I signed up to.

MBNA dug out a badly copied signed agreement but it contained no prescribed T&Cs that could be linked to it said agreement.

 

They then went on to place a default on my credit file.

I didn't receive a default notice or any warning of this at all.

 

I was hoping it may have been incorrect to challenge it on those grounds,

but unfortunately, I never received one.

 

They never took me to court, they never pursued it any further

- as I believe they couldn't chase the debt due to incorrect paperwork.

 

Fast forward 6 years and the default drops off next month.

This has affected our ability to move house in that time amongst other things.

Previous to this my credit file was really good and clean. It still is, apart from this one default.

 

My question is,

can I now go on to sue them for defamation of character or something similar?

 

I'm also going to pursue a PPI claim against them to for pre-exisiting medical conditions & self employment.

 

I haven't attempted this before as I was afraid they could slap the default on again

this time with a correct Default notice and I would have to wait another 6 years to clear my file.

 

Any advice would be really appreciated

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the mid 1990s Lloyds TSB wrongly put a default onto my credit file.

I did have a credit card with them which they incorrectly defaulted.

I wrote a letter asking for compensation of £1,000.

They sent me a cheque for £750.00, which I accepted, and of course the illegal default was removed from my credit file.

Result :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You wont get them for defamation of character. It will also be hard for you to get compensation as you havent really done anything about the default in 6 years.

 

You MIGHT be able to get the ICO involved if you can show the default was placed incorrectly AND you have proof you suffered financially due to the alleged error.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

BSC - no the CC agreement is signed by me, so it's definitely my debt, however the credit agreement is unenforceable.

 

RenegadeImp - The agreement was unenforceable due to them not being able to produce the credit agreement showing all the correct prescribed terms and conditions. The showed my T&Cs or what they 'could' have looked like. They then defaulted me without sending a DN, therefore not giving me the opportunity to remedy the debt before the default was applied.

 

It good to see that is was remedied Florish and you at least got compensation :)

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

this thread refers...

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?81907-MBNA-ding-ding-Round-2/page3

 

don't think you stand a chance

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX, well I don't really want to flog a dead horse.

 

But MBNA being able to issue defaults on unenforceable agreements without DNs is not entirely good practice is it?

 

There's no way they can issue a correct DN at this point is there, as I'm going to go after them for PPI.

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi unenforceable just means they cannot enforce in court though some try with those unaware of the regulations that apply they can do almost anything else and some do. MBNA just ignore they HATE that.

 

Going after them for PPI they would just offset against any outstanding debt on the account if you wanted the money you would have to take them to court and get the judge to agree with you.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks dpick - I have had the card since 1993, so it's quite a long time paying the PPI (with compound 8% interest) - however, I think I may just draw a line under it now and move on :)

 

I've waited so, so long for this default to drop off - the next 30 days can't come quick enough!! We can finally begin to look at moving house :) :) :)

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

The agreement was unenforceable due to them not being able to produce the credit agreement showing all the correct prescribed terms and conditions.

 

That only relates to enforcing the debt through a court. They can still add a default.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks dpick - I have had the card since 1993, so it's quite a long time paying the PPI (with compound 8% interest) - however, I think I may just draw a line under it now and move on :)

 

I've waited so, so long for this default to drop off - the next 30 days can't come quick enough!! We can finally begin to look at moving house :) :) :)

 

Agree just having rid of them gave me such a lift.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

the PPI will be at THEIR compounded rate

 

so it will be worth £1000's

 

once the default in the summary reaches 6yrs

it will VANISH from your CRa file NEVER to return.

 

no matterwhat MBNAdo.

 

of course yes they'll prob offset

but with a card of that age for PPI

 

you are in for a huge reclaim

 

browsing the other threads on this card

 

it seems you hae all the statements.

 

so use an AVG APR

and if there are months that you do not know the PPI charges

use an AVG PPI figure of those months you do know.

 

use the CISHEET

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should have been properly challenged at the start, no effort having been made to reduce the damage likely to be caused will seriously impact on any claim made now or in the future.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should have been properly challenged at the start, no effort having been made to reduce the damage likely to be caused will seriously impact on any claim made now or in the future.

 

I never challenged at the time as I'd only had my 2nd child 2 weeks previous to the default and my mind was elsewhere.

 

As for no effort, I looked to challenge it 2-3 years in but was scared that they would default me 2-3 years in as I never received any DN.

 

So, yes I'm only coming at now when they can no longer slap me with any further spiteful actions that could seriously impact us for a longer period of time.

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

the PPI will be at THEIR compounded rate

 

so it will be worth £1000's

 

once the default in the summary reaches 6yrs

it will VANISH from your CRa file NEVER to return.

 

no matterwhat MBNAdo.

 

of course yes they'll prob offset

but with a card of that age for PPI

 

you are in for a huge reclaim

 

browsing the other threads on this card

 

it seems you hae all the statements.

 

so use an AVG APR

and if there are months that you do not know the PPI charges

use an AVG PPI figure of those months you do know.

 

use the CISHEET

 

dx

 

The problem is I don't have the 20 years worth of statements, so I really couldn't work out how much I've paid out over that period. Can I ask for statements going back so far?

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

so you've never SAr'd them?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

so you've never SAr'd them?

 

dx

 

Yes, but I think I only got about 6/7 years worth, I will go and dig out what I have and see what payments have been made to PPI for that period.

PLEASE sign this petition to reduce amount of time CRAs hold your data

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/CreditRA

 

I HATE MBNA :evil::-x:mad::-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...