Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HDR - v - HSBC


Dougal16T
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2671 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

HOT OFF THE PRESS!!!:)

HSBC MAN - A MR ROBERT SHELLEY - TELEPHONED ME TODAY....HE SAID THAT FRESHFIELDS SOLICITORS ACTING AS AGENTS FOR DG 'SENT BY COURIER YESTERDAY (TO ME AND TO THE COURT) THEIR TRIAL BUNDLE!!

I WAS NOT AT HOME SO THE COURIER 'LEFT IT IN A SECURE PLACE!'

I'VE NOT SEEN IT YET!!!

HE ALSO SAID THAT AS I HAD BEEN SUCCESSFUL IN HAVING MY STAY LIFTED HSBC WERE APLYING TO HAVE THE STAY RE-INSTATED, AS THE BANK FELT THAT IT WAS ONLY FAIR (???!) TO HAVE ALL CASES DEALT WITH EQUALLY!!!:confused:

 

WORRYING: HSBC WROTE TO ME RECENTLY TO SAY 'THEIR SOLICITORS (DG) HAD INFORMED THEM THAT AS I HAD HAD MY STAY LIFTED ON THE GROUNDS OF HARDSHIP AND WAS HAVING FINANCIAL DIFFICULTIES THEY WANTED ME TO COMPLETE AN INCOME AND EXPENDITURE FORM (ENCLOSED) SO THEY COULD SEE IF THEY COULD HELP ME!!!! THEN THIS MORNING THEY TOLD ME THEY WANTED ME TO PAY IN £38 TO BRING MY OVERDRAFT OF £2000 BACK TO WITHIN ITS LIMIT!!!

 

IS IT ANY WONDER THEY ARE BEING TAKEN TO COURT? ARE THEY 'FIT AND PROPER PEOPLE TO HOLD A LICENCE????

 

THE BBC ARE COMING TO EASTBOURNE ON SEPTEMBER 24TH (2.30 P.M.) TO FILM EVENTS.....WATCH THIS SPACE, AND WATCH OUT FOR HSBC (Horrible Sly Backstabbers Club)....

 

Best wishes to all on this site....WE WILL BE SHOWN TO BE IN THE RIGHT!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dougal16T, defo watching this space:D

I refused to fill in their income/expend, as I found it very intrusive:mad:

all the best mate:)

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Dougal thats a first !!! let us know whats in the bundle :)

 

We all know how HSBC "help people" here's a nice managed loan that you will have trouble paying back before your coffin lid is being nailed down but never mind we will have had the money back off you a million times over by then and we can always put a claim in against your estate.

 

I see their re-request for a stay as a direct contravention of the FSA/OFT waiver, you have already proved to your Judge you are a case of special need so the case must now be heard or they must make an offer.

 

Have you told Bank Fodder and Co what they are doing now ???

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

HE ALSO SAID THAT AS I HAD BEEN SUCCESSFUL IN HAVING MY STAY LIFTED HSBC WERE APLYING TO HAVE THE STAY RE-INSTATED, AS THE BANK FELT THAT IT WAS ONLY FAIR (???!) TO HAVE ALL CASES DEALT WITH EQUALLY!!!:confused:

 

Having thought about that further, I think its actualy proof that HSBC/DG Solicitors are not interested in the test case or the agreements associated with it, all they want is for all claims to be stopped now on whatever grounds they can think of and as such it is further proof of their ongoing procrastination and abuse of the court process with regard to the money they have deducted from peoples accounts.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can not belive your post :eek: - the OFT are holding the banks hands going into court by having a pre-hearing agreement and now HSBC appear to be breaking the written document that included filtering out genuine cases - which the courts obviously thought you were.

 

Why are they suddenly worreid about treating everybody fairly - they have not done so before.

 

I wish you lots of luck with your endevours. Hope you get lots of expert help

 

Jan:)

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

My thanks to Remus, kenny the celt, Jansus and Castlebest.....and everyone

without you all I would never have got this far!!:)

 

I've now got my hands on the HSBC Trial Bundle..is it the only one in captivity?...watch this space....(sorry not read it yet...but it was 'left in a secure place' by their Courier - IT WAS RESTING AGAINST MY DUSTBIN WHICH IS OUTSIDE MY FRONT DOOR AND IN FULL VIEW AND REACH OF THE PUBLIC - perhaps this is what HSBC mean by 'secure'!!!!

I think I'll read what they have sent and think about

Highly Shabbily Behaving Conmerchants........:cool:

 

Remember it's your money they've got.....GET IT BACK!!;)

 

KIND THOUGHTS TO EVERYONE..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning All,

 

This is an update on the TRIAL BUNDLE!!

 

Thanks for the e-mail. The attached will show you the 'statement' and pages 199-211 referred to by Mr Shelley in his statement are merely the 'Putting your finances in order' brochure that HSBC issue!

 

I was informed by a Mr Robert Shelley of HSBC that this bundle was sent by Courier yesterday (4th), the Courier could not get a response (I told Mr Shelley I would not be home until Tuesday evening - away visiting friends) so according to Mr Shelley 'it has been left in a secure place'[The Trial Bundle was left leaning against my dustbin, which is at the front of my property and within 2 steps of the footpath and full view of the public!! This is HSBC's idea of 'secure' I presume!! (and the 'Trial Bundle' was also served on the Court at Eastbourne - a day late!

 

You will see that Mr Shelley (2 page statement with 2 cover pages) states in para 9. 'It is confirmed that the Defendant is corresponding with the Claimant in order to discuss his current financial circumstances in accordnce with the usual bank procedures'. THIS IS AT THE WORST UNTRUE, AND AT THE BEST MISLEADING.

 

Because I received by 'special delivery' on 1/9, the attached letter dated 31/8/2007. No previous correspondence or telephone calls have been received.

 

I also received on Monday 3/9/07 a telephone call from HSBC to discuss my finances, I said 'If you are not going to talk about my charges I have nothing else to say to you' and ended the call. I then got another call on Tuesday 4/9/07 again the same question, 'Can we discuss your account?' My answer 'No', next question from caller 'We need you to pay £38.00 into your account so that you will be back within your overdraft limit'. I told this male (a) exactly what I thought, (b) No I would not be paying them any money until they paid me, and © he should record all of the conversation and 'escalate it' to someone 'further up the tree!'

 

The remainder of the file which runs to 240 pages is as follows:

01-01 Account types

03 - 025 Personal banking T & C (Undated)

025 - 044 As above but dated 09/02

045 - 091 As above but dated 2005

092 - 138 (yes, you've guessed it!) As above but dated 2006

139 - 140 'Bank Account cards and travel' leaflet dated 12/01

141 - 144 'Student and Graduate Price List and Interest Rates dated 10/01

145 - 147 'HSBC Premier price list and interest rates' dated 10/01

150 - 153 'Bank account cards and travel' price list and interest rates dated 10/02

154 - 157 'Student and graduate price list and interest rates' dated 10/02

158 - 162 'Premier' price list and interest rates dated 10/02

163 - 164 'Bank Account cards and travel' leaflet dated 09/04

165 - 166 'Student and graduate price list and interest rates' dated 09/04

167 - 174 'Premier' price list and interest rates dated 09/04

175 - 176 'Bank Account cards and travel' leaflet dated 08/05

177 - 178 'Student and graduate price list and interest rates' dated 08/05

179 - 186 'Premier' price list and interest rates dated 08/05

187 - 188 'Bank account cards and travel 'Price list and interest rates 11/06

189 - 190 'Student and graduate price list and interest rates' dated 12/06

191 - 198 'Premier' price list and interest rates dated 12/06

199 - 199 Copy of letter dated 31/8/2007 to me regarding 'completion of income and expenditure'

200 - 211 'Putting your finances in order' brochure

212 - 240 Copies of my bank statements from 03/07/06 - 22/08/07

 

I hope all this helps!

 

If you require any further info please let me know.

 

Kind regards

 

Howard (Dougal 16T)

p.s. : BBC TV will be filming the events at Eastbourne County Court on 24th September for the 'Money Programme'01.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Pete and everyone else,

 

At no time in Mr Shelley's statement does he (on behalf of HSBC) deny their charges are excessive, and at no time does he state they are reasonable. Basically it is a load of c**p (pardon my french - or 'excusez-moi' as they say). The bundle is not indexed, not labelled, and the ring binder is plain white with no markings on it to identify it!! Further it does not set out the case for the defence in any manner shape or form!....and was filed a day late!!

 

It appears to be a lot of paper intended to put off a claimant and yet I feel this is another example of abuse of process by HSBC, as there is , in my humble opinion, nothing in this a Judge would need to read. In essence it is not what should have been filed - it is NOT their case against my claim, it is just a lot of.....:eek:

 

However, I intend to serve a subpeona on Mr Shelley so that he has to appear, having produced a witness statement which is filed on behalf of the Bank!

 

Any thoughts anyone.....please don't be shy - I can take it!!:cool:

 

Best wishes to all of you...

 

Kind regards

 

Dougal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello first to lolly and then to Bill,

 

Lolly my date is 24th September 2007 at 2.30 p.m. at Eastbourne County Court and the BBC will be there filming events for the 'Money Programme'! Thanks for your good wishes - don't forget if I can help, just ask...I might be able to...!:)

Bill, if your claim has been acknowledged this does not neccessarily mean that it has been stayed, you could phone the Court office at Northampton and they will tell you, but you should receive a 'General form of Judgement or Order' from the Court which will tell you the claim has been stayed and all the details - IF it has been stayed...if not ...keep going....I am pleased to try to help, this site has been fantastic for me and has helped me no end. Everyone is so good and kind.

 

My best wishes to you all - a photograph of the DG 'Trial Bundle' will be posted here shortly - for those of you who like a laugh, :) those who are of a nervous disposition :o should remain seated whilst viewing the image (once it has been posted!!)

 

Remember -.... 'let's be careful out there!'

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

My best wishes to you all - a photograph of the DG 'Trial Bundle' will be posted here shortly - for those of you who like a laugh, :) those who are of a nervous disposition :o should remain seated whilst viewing the image (once it has been posted!!)

 

Remember -.... 'let's be careful out there!'

 

have you put the first in captivity in a cage or is it too timid for that? :D

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember -.... 'let's be careful out there!'

 

oooh, sgt. esterhouse wasn't it - one of my all time favourite shows!

 

you go, dougal - i really like reading about your exploits!

 

looking forward to seeing the famous bundle!

Link to post
Share on other sites

,

 

Lolly my date is 24th September 2007 at 2.30 p.m. at Eastbourne County Court

 

how daft do i feel?!! i dont know where i got the 6th from. looking forward to seeing DGs bundle. they obviously left it where they felt it belonged. i file a great deal of their clients information pretty much the same way, to be honest!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning Pete and Lateralus,

Firstly Pete, I couldn't reply yesterday as this creature was very hungry and has eaten my cheque book and bank card..!!....typical Horribly Sly Backstabbers Club members behaviour.

However once I took it's photo it went to sleep....pictures to follow...

And Lateralus...well remembered, yes it was Sergeant Phil Oosterhaus from Hill Street Precinct! As an ex-pc myself I thought the show was brilliant!

Photos of bundle to follow....it looks as exciting as cold custard!!:(

Best wishes to you all and thanks for your fanatstic help and interest....

......'Let's do it to them, before they do it to us....'

Regards

Howard (aka Dougal.....that's the Westie in my avatar!!!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you want to post them on here Dougal?

If so then I would recomend regestering with photobucket.com.

It is free and very secure. Once you have an account you can upload pictures from your computer to your "album". Then they will have a code that you can use to put into the reply box and it will show the picture!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well as expected thats pretty unremarkable but it is the only one in existence as far as I know :).

 

I think on a level playing field you should win hands down but as you know from all the other threads here playing fields have a habit of tipping unexpectedly at the moment.

 

All I can say is good luck and be prepared for the unexpected, If HSBC pull something out you haven't seen before tell the Judge its not allowed or at least ask for an adjournment to consider your next move ;), but you know that :)

 

all the best and fingers crossed

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...