Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, Apologies for bringing up the same topic regarding these individuals. I wish I had found this forum earlier, as I've seen very similar cases. However, I need your help in figuring out what to do next because we've involved our partners/resellers. I work as an IT Manager in a company outside of the UK. We acquired a license from a certified reseller (along with a support agreement) and also obtained training sessions from them. The issue arose when we needed to register two people for the training sessions, so we used an external laptop for the second user to keep up with the sessions for only a month. During this period, the laptop was solely used for the training sessions. After two weeks, my boss forwarded an email to me from Ms Vinces, stating that we are using illicit software from SolidWorks. Since this has never happened to me or anyone we know, I went into panic mode and had a meeting with her. During the meeting, we explained that we were using an external laptop solely for the training sessions and that the laptop had not been used within the company since her email. She informed us that for such cases, there are demos and special licenses (though our reseller did not mention these types of licenses when we made our initial purchase). She then mentioned that we had utilized products worth approximately €25k and presented us with two options: either pay the agreed value or acquire SolidWorks products. We expressed that the cost was too high, and our business couldn't support such expenses. I assured her that we would discuss the matter with the company board and get back to her. After the meeting, we contacted the company reseller from whom we purchased the license, explained the situation, and mentioned the use of an external laptop. They said they would speak to Maria and help mediate the situation. We hoped to significantly reduce the cost, perhaps to that of a 1-year professional license. Unfortunately, we were mistaken. The reseller mediated a value €2k less than what Maria had suggested (essentially, we would need to acquire two professional lifetime licenses and two years of support for a total of €23k). This amount is still beyond our means, but they insisted that the price was non-negotiable and wouldn't be reduced any further. The entire situation feels odd because she never provided us with addresses or other evidence (which I should have requested), and she's pressuring us to resolve the matter by the end of the month, with payment to be made through the reseller. This makes me feel as though the reseller is taking advantage of the situation to profit from it. Currently, we're trying to buy some time. We plan to meet with the reseller next week but are uncertain about how to proceed with them or whether we should respond to the mediator.
    • Thanks London  if I’ve read correctly the questionaire wants me to post his actual name on a public forum… is that correct.  I’ve only had a quick read so far
    • Plenty of success stories, also bear in mind not everyone updates the forum.  Overdale's want you to roll over and pay, without using your enshrined legal right to defend. make you wet yourself in fear that a solicitor will Take you to court, so you will pay up without question. Most people do just that,  but you are lucky that you have found this place and can help you put together a good defence. You should get reading on some other Capital One and Overdale's cases on the forum to get an idea of how it works.  
    • In both versions the three references to "your clients" near the end need to be changed to "you" or "your" as Alliance are not using solicitors, they have sent the LoC themselves. Personally I'd change "Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept" to "Dear Kev".  It would show you'd done your homework, looked up the company, and seen it's a pathetic one-man band rather than having any departments.  The PPCs love to pretend they have some official power and so you should be scared of them - showing you've sussed their sordid games and you're confident about fighting them undermines all this.  In fact that's the whole point of a snotty letter - to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did do court so better to drop you like a hot potato and go and pursue mugs who just give in instead. In the very, very, very, very unlikely case of Kev doing court, it'd be better that he didn't know in advance all the legal arguments you'd be using, so I'd heavily reduce the number of cards being played.
    • Thanx Londoneill get on to it this evening having a read around these forums I can’t seem to find many success stories using your methods. So how successful are these methods or am I just buying time for him  and a ccj will be inevitable in the end. Thanks another question is, will he have to appear at court..? I am not sure he has got it in him
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays Litigation Team Good or Evil? You Decide..


dar£n
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5718 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The FSA have said that banks HVE to honor any offers for 2 months - so work out when this is, and wait til a few days before that before you decide to jump ship...it hasn't sunk yet (or at all - we should win the case...its just what a definition of 'Win' is!)

 

Peter

Sign my petition to the Prime Minister here:

PETITION

Thanks

Peter

 

!!!WON!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 992
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Clubber, have a look here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bank/107652-oft-test-case-questions-2.html#post1037154

The point in question is point 2.

 

I suppose it is open to certain interpretation as to hat 'recent' is - but I can't see Barclays wanting to open any more kettle of worms - worth a reserach though!

 

Hope that helps

 

Peter

Sign my petition to the Prime Minister here:

PETITION

Thanks

Peter

 

!!!WON!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

.......(SORRY DAR£IN TO CONTRADICT YOU WHEN YOU SAID " They will NOT honour their offer if you intend to continue! in a nother thread) because they have

Okay Clubber in answer to you comment that has been posted at least ten times throughout this site - This comment was made some time ago when the procedure was running normal, as a standard THEN, if the settlement offer was disputed in any way the banks would NOT honour or renegotiate....This is NOT saying this is the way they go now, Since the ruling The OFT has ordered the banks to honour any settlement offers for a set period..Things have change dramatically in the past couple of weeks as the banks became aware of this new ruling.....So although I would be wrong in using that statement NOW..it was correct at the time...

 

I lose£120 court costs but i am confident of claiming that back from MCOL.

I really hope you and anyone else in the same position is able to get the court fees back from MCOL and local courts i would be very surprised if a refund is made, unless you contact them before 10am the following day after submitting the claim...the fee is partly for running costs of the court.... but saying that these are exceptional circumstance where no-one could have possibly known this would happen [from our side that is].

 

Let us know how you get on.

 

for guidance see here:

If you would like to apply for a refund

 

Please read this guidance, and then apply for exemption or remission on Form EX160. You can also obtain this form from a county court office.

But the court must receive form EX160 within 6 months, starting from the day when you paid the fee and the evidence (see page 5) must have the details which would have allowed the court to accept it on the day when you paid the fee.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it in our interest to actually discontinue the claim? I wouldprefer to keep it there just in case there is another consumer revolt akin to the Poll Tax, one where the FSA ( who is here to protect the consumer :rolleyes: ) may do a U turn. If you keep the claim going, at least you may have a bit of interest accumulating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed:

Best be at the top of the small 'as is' pile, than the bottom of a large pile of every consumer in the last 6 years!

dead on ,will keep the interest level higher in case.also and rightly so,those with ongoing claims sorted quicker and easier ,either way case goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was hoping for a settlement to clear my overdraft situation, which has been caused by these excessive charges and get on with my life, but I will fight to the bitter end and have absolutely no intention of folding now at this stage... we must continue to be positive in our search for justice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dar£n, many thanks for the link to refunding court costs. More importantly I accept totally your explanation about not being able to accept previous offers- you are right, times have changed...my thread was certainly not meant to be a slight on your or your comments and the reason for posting it 10 times (at least!) was\as the result of a response asking for me to do that...all we can do at the moment is share our experiences as, now more than ever, we don't have a lot to work on. the other point here is that none of us know each others situations or lives and although every comment on here is meant as genuine support, one person taking 70-75% and another waiting for a year or more (accruing the 8%) may represent just as sweet a result dependent on their circumstances.

 

I have read all your comments Dar£n and your advice and support is 2nd to none.

 

My case is 8th August. I am going to see\what happens on Monday's and Wednesdays hearings and contact my court to see what the local score is. i will decide based on what I hear whether to discontinue and take the 75% offer or cancel the offer and go to court. What is interesting about my 13 point hearing order is that the judge has put the onus on the bank to evidence the fairness of the charges, if I get time I will post on here.

 

thanks Dar£n, no offence meant...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinking the same Saintly, unless the trend from Monday onwards is to indiscrminately stay all cases regardless of B's attendance, the filing of papers etc etc. I have not been able to read an update on recent comments about individual courts making that decision. I am hoping that judge's who made an order after listing cases pre 26 July will want to continue having control over their court. A lot will depend on the Judges interpretation of the guidance they are given. I have to say in my experience of county courts Judges are very precious and give little account of non precedent findings and, hopefully best of all, do not like their time abused as we all know B's have been guilty of.

 

This is such a difficult time... my fingers are crossed for those in court 1st next week. Lets hope Judges who have already made orders have the resolve to see them through and are prepared to throw out defences where there are no shows and where defence bundles are not filed- as they know they should....very interesting!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to confirm things at the Lit Dept.

 

Emailed to ask the question about phoning to settle.

 

Reply received today:

All claimants can continue to contact us if they need to - there’s just very little we can do to help now, as you obviously know, we will not be settling any more claims as we wait for the outcome of the test case. I hope this clarifies things for you.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It has now been a month since I sent the settlement letter to Paul Quinn just before my court date which I didnt go to as I had received the letter. I havent received the money and Paul does not reply to emails and Dino just tells me there is a backlog so does anyone have any advise on what to do now please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ref ongoing cases, those with court dates in particular.

If my undestanding is correct the judge should rule in the claimants favour if the defendent offers no defence, ie does not submit his paperwork/bundle?

It will be interesting to see what happens, my date is the 22nd, I am submitting my bundle this week as we are then away until the 21st.

I am not going to spend two weeks winding myself up about it, what will be will be, but do we have a valid argument for persuading the judges that by not complying with court orders the defendents should have the defence struck out & so a judgement in our favour.

Fingers crossed, so near but yet so far..................

Andrew

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in the same position, submitted my bundle before the test case announcement and Barclays didnt submit theirs. Can we write to the judge and ask them to strike out their defence for non compliance and request a judgement before the hearing? Or can we only make this suggestion at the hearing itself?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can only request it for the consideration of the judge, thats if you get in first, if the judge has decided prior to stay the case theirs not a fat lot you can do at the moment....we are working on a decent template to work against these stays...keep watching..

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great to hear you are working on a template! :D

 

Is there a sample letter I can send the judge today to ask him to consider striking out their defence, in the hope of getting in before the stay request?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im in exactly the same situation. My court date is 8th August, bundle submitted. Verbal offer to settle on 23rd and again on 25th which I confirmed back to them in an email (verbal agreement made by Mr Quinn and confirmed by Emma Thompson). I fear this means nothing now but I can use email in evidence.

this morning my court have not received any directions to stay cases and their next hearing about bank charge claims is.. wait for it, mine next week so I will not be able to see how judge interprets situation before then..he is currently on leave until the end of the week.

 

Do I go with it and apply for defence to be struck out for £2200 or take the £1495 currently on the table from customer relations? How much is the stress worth? How much would I like the judge to find in my favour?

 

Back to how much I need the money.. its like deal or no bleedin' deal!

 

There are other cases going ahead today, will be interesting to see if blanket stays are being given- anyone had any update on this?

 

So many questions....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read in another thread on here,

 

someone was asking for a stickie, so people in court in the coming days, and weeks can post what happens in court.

 

I am sure this is a good idea, and will keep everyone updated on what is happening in courts up and down the country.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm just spoke to the court manager to check if they had received Barclays Court Bundle, obviously they didn't. They also didn't receive any "stay" requests.

 

When I asked the lady if I could request a judgement based on their failing to file their bundle and failing to follow the direction of the court she became very vague. Said that on the day the judge would consider it, but that it was not usual to request it in advance. She then suggested I get legal representation to gain clarity on the situation.

 

Very helpful.

 

I am double worried as:

1. the OFT/FSA test case issues

and

2. I can't make it to the court hearing date any more due to a personal clash

 

Any advice on how to request the judgement based on Barclays non compliance?

 

Also does anyone have any suggestions on what I should do regarding my not being able to attend the hearing itself?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...