Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bryan Carter- Ceased as a Company???!!! *Took a while but WON in the end


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5321 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

does it really matter, am cheesed off that I got up fot this. PS I dont do searches for anyone and please stop pm me them. Will prob be online tomorrow but failing that will be here in June 07 got to go and am not happy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 526
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Whilst it may be possible for the site team to check IP addresses for users, this in no way means that a poster on the site can be directly attributed to an individual. We would not publish such information either, since it would be in breach of the Data Protection Act.

 

The only thing that ALL users need to bear in mind is that we must follow the forum rules at all times. This means NOT stating names of individuals who you might associate with comments of a personal nature - for instance "Joe Bloggs is in trouble with ABC agency for the way he runs his company".

 

If users posts do not breach forum rules, there is nothing to be concerned about at all. Likewise, all visitors are welcome to post if they too adhere to site rules.

 

Remember that if you don't like what someone posts but it is not in breach of any rules, you have the option to ignore their comments and continue with your own discussion.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what about johnny bag of dsex company is in trouble for LEAKING information pmsl, cmon get a handle on it, we are here to help each other, I for one dont need anyone else giving me dos and donts get enough of that from dcas, so lighten up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is intended to be exactly that - and also a reminder not to make any personal comments about any users.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey. Broken chairs, the crunch of glass underfoot, did I miss a fight?? Have the 2REP been in??? :p :p Only Joking, Calvi.

 

At the risk of sounding like a bit of a creep to the mods, I think it might be a good idea to tone it down a bit with some of the posters. Whether that was the real Bryan or a representative (unlikely, but not impossible) is irrelevant. You're missing some good opportunities to get opinions from supporters of the 'other side'

 

Right. I'm away again.

 

Seconds out...........

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

what about johnny bag of dsex company is in trouble for LEAKING information pmsl,

 

That's class :rolleyes:,i had the same prob a while ago with a so called Bailiff Bennyg13 remember him/her and from there on learned a valuable lesson,the more you bite the more him/her will do it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just had a thought.

 

 

All roundabouts do is to go round in circles without actually going anywhere:cool:

 

 

Coincidence or not.

 

 

Who knows

 

 

 

 

Who cares

 

 

 

 

The truth will out

Link to post
Share on other sites

-----Original Message-----

 

To: [email protected]

Subject: Bryan Carter & Co

 

It has now been made well clear that Mr Bryan Carter is still a practicing

solicitor,but as has been stated by many Bryan Carter & Co is no longer

trading.

My question to you,if Mr Carter continues to use Bryan Carter & Co

letterheads is this legal

Kind Regards

xxxxx xxxxxx

 

Thank you for your email.

Having read your email I consider that you may benefit for speaking with an Advisor on our Helpline. The telephone number is 0845 608 6565.

Yours sincerely

LCS Email Enquiries Team

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In regards to all the opinions given in this thread i now will give my final one

 

If any action is taking against myself in a court regarding any debt i might have with the person mentioned in this thread i will defend myself,

 

I have recieved NO correspondence from this person i.e. letters requesting payments,threat of court action etc etc, in fact i'm totally in the dark as to why i'm in court in the first place.

 

what i have received is threatening letters from a company that dosesn't exist,so i did what we are always being advised by the trading standards and ripped them up (bogus letters) i hope this clarifies matters from my point of view

:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree with you here setmefree. Also note the fraud act and attempting to expose someone to risk of loss when this so called company are not trading. I wonder what Customs and Excise will think of them, perhaps a vat inspection. Just a thought

Link to post
Share on other sites

what i have received is threatening letters from a company that dosesn't exist,so i did what we are always being advised by the trading standards and ripped them up (bogus letters) i hope this clarifies matters from my point of view

:p

 

Yes we are always being warned about fraudsters from non existant companies making all sorts of promises regarding money. I think you would be wise to ignore them.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i posted the other day saying i am due to pay £10 on the 22nd of this month now i no ive to report it to SOS, but do i still send payment with it been a ccj i do not want any more court costs adding or anyone knocking at my door(bailiffs),cos i aint paid em.But for good measures send a postal order made out acc payee mr brian carter,and see if he cashes just for good measures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's a CCJ it's best to just carry on paying it - it's not a good idea to mess with a court order because it can lead to a world of sh... trouble.

 

Keep an eye on things and see how they develop with SoS.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the CCJ was granted by the Courts. Now if it turns out a Non-Existant Company was instrumental in obtaining the CCJ the its whole legality may be called into question. In the meantime it still stands so must be paid

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all just received a letter from our friend ,both of my accounts have now been passed back to their originators

:D :D :D :D :D :D

These of course were the two accounts that were being taken straight to Court if you didnt cough up instantly. Good job you were able to send out an SOS ...---...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all just received a letter from our friend ,both of my accounts have now been passed back to their originators

:D :D :D :D :D :D

 

 

WELL DONE YOU!!

 

Now let's hope that other "stirrings" put a certain person straight regarding what he cannot do!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

We must all now look at another aspect of our situations regarding the letters,Trading Standards state's any body who receives letter from a company that seem's suspicious requesting monies,should contact them with their case.(i.e. excuse me Sir i keep getting letters from a company that doesn't exist,could you look into to this for me)

this way you are suspecting the company and not the person;) if you get my drift.

i'm sure we all have local trading standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have now had further correspondence about my cases,this time from fredrickson international lol it's a shame that Carter didn't inform me that he had passed my details on

 

We are specialists in Litigation and are users of the County Court Bulk Centre,(we know) where we are one of the largest agency users.(we know that too) We have developed our systems to take advantage of bulk issue.(we are all aware of this) Our objective is to create a ‘Debtor Profile’,(you are guilty regardless) to obtain as much information as quickly as possible, this enables us to select the ‘won’t pay’(coz you aint produced a CCA) from the ‘can’t pay’ debtors and ensure cost effective litigation to maximise collections for our clients (pay us now and we might find a CCA later):D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone help? I have received a letter this morning for my son whois currently working in Spain. It is from our old friends Bryan Carter at the Weybridge address stating that this is a final notice re his debt to Carphonewarehouse..via Freidricksons, saying that the debt must be paid before the 31st May otherwise court proceedings will be issued on that date with out further notice and adding court costs and intereest...etc etc.

If I send the CCA letter to them at the Weybridge address will this stave off court proceedings etc?? I have told them that my son is in Spain and have been told it will make no difference as the case will go ahead without him.

I am at my wits end here, can anyone advise me??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...