Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Is the letter headed Letter of Claim/before Claim or similar? If not, it sounds like more of the threatogram chain. If you're not sure, post up an anonymised copy of the letter and we'll check. HB
    • So guess what, we have received a final demand letter for £100. It states if payment is not made by 11/06 they will have no option but to forward the case to their litigation dept with a view to commence County Court Proceedings. So just wondering if anyone has any advice. Do we ignore this? or do we need to take action? Thanks 
    • hi dx, thanks for helping just re-reading everything this morning and I must have missed this one from uncle in his thread "What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. "  are you in disagreement with this based on your last sentence?
    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
    • Hello!  Wondering if someone can help with this.  I suspect not but worth a go.  I appreciate the "contract is with the seller" line, which is what Evri has fed me but wanted to see if someone with experience in these things could suggest anything else I could do here.  I appreciate there are many topics about lost parcels - My parcels weren't lost, until the driver walked up to my door with them and then decided to make them lost/stolen... I'll summarise what has happened.  Wednesday of last week - Evri delivery driver stole / walked off with 3 of my parcels.  -  Arrived outside my properly, took photos (3 separate photos as its 3 separate deliveries) of the tops of the parcels (pointlessly zoomed in on just the labels, couldn't see anything else, other than a small piece of the pavement and a little weed, which doubly confirms it was outside my door as I can see the same plant), marked the order as delivered and walked off with them.  He's marked on the Evri GPS marked that he was outside.   -  3 different deliveries, from the same company (same boxes etc.), but 3 separate tracking numbers. -  Went through the Evri bot which opened a case on each tracking number.  I then phoned them and left a voicemail explaining what had happened. -  24 hours later had a canned response asking me if the packages had turned up and to check around etc..  I responded explaining again what happened and that they've definitely been taken. -  4 days later,  this morning, I get a response telling me to ask the merchant to refund me. I've responded to this message with a long email, repeating what I said, that I believe the driver has stolen these packages and that he took those suspicious top down shots of the packages, marked them as delivered without ringing or knocking etc.  I've said that I expect them to investigate further, but I gather they won't. In my several messages to them initially and later, I told them I don't care about a refund and wanted the parcels.  They contain some sentimental stuff, nothing of high monetary value, hence me going to this trouble.  I only paid £25 for the contents. I did contact the merchant when this first happened and they asked me to wait a few days.  They ended up refunding me despite me asking them not to and that I wanted them to escalate it with Evri because this appears to be a case of theft.  They didn't seem bothered - Refunded me and told me to go back to Evri and escalate it with them? So - Is there any way to compel Evri to conduct a proper investigation with this driver?  Search for my parcels? I have quite a lot of deliveries handled by Evri (not out of choice) - They used to have a fantastic chap and I rarely had any issues.  He has been replaced by a new guy and I believe the route is handled by this same guy who I believe has taken my packages.  Naturally, I fear this is going to happen again in the future if no investigation occurs. Appreciate any assistance - Thanks for reading. Al.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mercers/Barclaycard Debt Help Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5705 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

With reference to a comment Barclayshark made in their lastest manuscript;

 

"We will only consider a token monthly repayment when formally approached by a natianally recognised debt counselling company".

 

Does anyone know of one that would take on my case, free of charge?

 

I have tried a few but they are only offering DMP's or IVA's, but they want between £100-£150pm repayment, which is out of the question on state benefits.

 

I just am at a loss as what to do next with Barclayshark, they will not agree to nothing.

 

Thanks again

Alf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

 

"We will only consider a token monthly repayment when formally approached by a natianally recognised debt counselling company".

 

 

Alf

Hi,

Save that letter. If you have offered a token payment and it's all you can afford a Judge would not be impressed if this were ever to get to court. They are actually refusing an amacable solution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi alf,

 

 

That is almost exactly the same letter that they sent me!

 

That's when I sent my letter telling reminding that they are aware of my situation etc etc!

 

The bit about only helping you if a debt counselling agency acts on your behalf is a load of b*******! If you can only afford a token payment, then that's that, regardless of who approaches them!

 

However, should you wish to use an agency, may I suggest CCCS.

 

CCCS - Tel: 0800 138 1111

 

Or you may wish to contact your local Citizens Advice Bureau.

 

 

Best wishes, Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alf, I have been having an issue with Barclaycard/Mercers as well. Receiving sometimes 30 phonecalls in one day. I have made them accept an offer of a minimum payment of £20 per month plus they have reduced the interest for me down to 1%.

 

The only way I have done this is by email, initially to the customer services address and then it was passed onto someone in the customer relations department. He listened to my complaints regarding payments and the number of calls I was getting from Mercers and the 0845 number (which incidentally is Barclaycard after Mercers has passed the debt back to them I believe). He eventually managed to get the calls stopped - they are done on an automatic dialling system as you were told, but they can be stopped.

 

Anyway, if it is any use to you the email for the guy who helped me is [email protected]. He was very helpful and polite throughout several emails.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

this bit about 'sorry its an automated call system' i think is not answered correctly & IS illegal, just another load of rubbish.

 

it IS harrassment fullstop.

 

bit like the age old excuse about the mistake being my computer did it or it is not working.

 

sadly i'm on really long duties over thid b'holiday period so i cant browse the relevent doc.

but i bet it not a valid excuse.

there must be rules on it.

 

DON'T stop the payments keep doing it.

and whatever you do, for a civil debt, forget the bankrupt.

 

there is no need

 

dx100uk.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update folks,

I sent a reply back to Barclayshark saying I did not accept the excuse that the excessive calls were because of an automated system. Told them harrasment is harrassment automated or otherwise. Also give them an ear full about the ' I will be calling on you cards' quoted

2.12a ‘Not making the purpose of any proposed visit clear, for example, merely stating that collectors or field agents will call is not sufficient’

Also quoted

2.6f Pressurising debtors to pay in full, in unreasonably large installments or to increase payments when they are unable to do so’

with regards to them asking for ridiculas repayment amounts knowing full well I am on benefets.

I said I would continue to make these token payment regardless of their acceptance and asked why a default notice had not been issued, as they stated once it is issued;

“It will then be possible to negotiate a repayment plan with either BARCLAYCARD or a debt collection agency”

I suspect their whole letter is just a pack of lies and excuses, so to end the letter off with a bang, I said

"I hope you will seriously consider this final request to accept these token payments and suspend any further interest and charges. The situation is now getting out of hand. Should you decline again I strongly suggest that you act on my invitation and sue me for the debt".

As I beleive that once judgement is granted interest and charges will be frozen anyway. Don't know weither I did right or wrong here, but I was getting fed up with their attitude. Lets see what happens.

Your thoughts or comments are always appreciated.

Alf

Link to post
Share on other sites

benefits are paid by the goverment to allow you to exist not to fund

banks greed.

Every member of this site should try to recruit inform at least two new people a week.

approx 130000 members not many when you consider that credit card companies turn down 15000 applications per day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just to up date everyone on this case. I have heard nothing from Barclayshark or Mercers since May 07.

 

Sent letters asking then to sue me, then can explain to the judge why thay will not accept my token payment offer, also when they told me they culd not susspend fees and charges with out issing a default notice, I told them isue you then and stop wasting time. But like I said this was back in May 07, send the letters recorded delivery, but they never sign for them so no POD.

 

Got fed up of the fees and charges being added each month, debt is near £1000 more than it was, so wrote to them last friday at the regional office in Manchester. Told then I was disgusted with there lack of concern or communication and to stop the insterest and fees and refund the charges since I first informed them of the financial problems in January07. Ask them to answer within 10 working days or would stop token payments and file for bankcruptcy.

 

This morning the house phone and my mobile have been bombarded with calls, texts and voice messages from RMA? Who is this does, anyone know? If Barclayshark have passed this debt on to someone else should they not of informed me?

 

I have not answered any of there calls and am not going to because have no idea who they are or what they want. An urgent matter is all they say.

But I presume they have some connection with Barclayshark, as they only stared ringing after I sent my last letter to them. So I don't know if I should continue with the token payments to Barclaycard as they may not even own the debt now. This total lack of communication from them is a complete pain in the butt.

 

Any advice on where to go from here grately appreciated.

Cheers

Alf

Link to post
Share on other sites

stick by the payment

i would resend the letter in post 12

also start the process of reclaiming all your charges.

 

dx100uk

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice. But what good is sending the letter in post 12 going to do? I have sent it them once, they never answered that letter or any others I have sent, don't even sign for the recorded delivery, so another waste of money as still no proof of delivery.

 

Been on to royal mail about it, they say they don't have to sign for each individual letter as they receive hundreds a day, so one signiture covers all their days mail. Which is no use to me as proof.

 

Also who is the RMA, are they something to do with Barclayshark or not. If they are an outside DCA, shouldn't Barclayshark have informed me they have passed the debt over to a third party?

 

If Barclayshark does not own the debt anymore what is the point in paying money to them. As the new DCA if that what RCA is, will want payment as well.

 

Alf

Link to post
Share on other sites

if your cheque was in the same envelope as your letter and the cheque was cashed well they must have received your letter.

Bad move to send cheques. Cheques have your bank details and your signature (which can be copied and pasted any where)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are the two signatures on your document exactly the same? If they are then a cut and paste operation must have taken place as it is impossible for anyone to produce exactly the same signature -your signatures will all be different even if you do them thousands of times.

 

If they are different you will need to show that you have not written them and a hand writing expert will nearly always be able to give a definte opinion. My own view is that if you are certain that the signature is not yours it is a matter for the police who will be able to call on the necessary expertise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not understand the last reply, are the signitures the same on what documant?

 

Anyway, received a letter this morning, Formal Demand from NCO Europe LTD, trading as RMA (risk management alternatives) in Preston, say they have been informed by Barclayshark that I have not complied with the default notice they sent me. They have never sent me one. Even said in a letter that fees and interest could not be frozen until one had been issued.

 

This RMA says it wants the full ammount payable immediately. Statements will no longer be sent and that interest will still incurred at 1% per month.

Then the usual telephone us now on an 09707 number.

 

If you do not pay in full or contact us to make an agreement within 7 days your account will be refered to a Debt Collector who will call upon you for the full payment or a CCJ may be registered against you.. So what is this company if they are not debt collectors?

 

I will ask again something I asked previously. Doesn't Barclayshark have a legal obligation to inform me if they have pass the debt onto a third party?

 

So is this Barclayshark trying it on again like they did with MERCERS or a real outside DCA? Should I contact them? By letter of course? Or just send them a CCA? and wait and see. There is still no reply from Barclayshark themselves about anything I have asked them. I have just come to a dead end trying to deal with BC direct.

 

Please give as much advice as poss folks as do not want these T**sers turning up on the doorstep. Should I continue to make the token payments each month to BC or stop them?

 

Many thanks

Alf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fell free to CCA RMA/NCO, they will ignore you, but that doesn't really matter.

Once they pass the 12+month and demand payment then get Trading Standards involved.

 

Might also be worth getting touch with BT about "choose to refuse" service as RMA/NCO will inundate you with calls.

 

I had/have a B'card with RMA/NCO and I ended up changing my number due to the sheer volume of calls, 5 a day !!

TS are now dealing with this for me, but even they are being ignored !

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Another 2 letters this morning one from Alliance One. Exactly the same as the one from RMA yesterday, word for word, but no signiture or name on the letter and the payment should be made payable to Barclaycard. the second from RMA again "we have a proposal for you" that all it says.

 

So what it the course action, as I believe it is against the law for BC/MERCERS not to inform me they have passed the debt to someone else.

 

Also should I stop the token payment I make monthly direct to BC or not?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incidently this Alliance One isn't even a UK register company. They are US based. So I don't see how they can enforce anything in the UK. They also ask you to ring and full the full balance amount by credit or debit card.

 

If you dont within 7 days a debt collecter WILL call upon you for repayment.

 

I don't think so.:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Received a letter today after months of complaining to B/Card about lack of information regarding the account/s, telephone harrassment, no default notice, no statements and no reply to token payment offer.

 

They say

"I can confirm that these account have been passed on. Barlaycard are no longer in possession of these accounts and you should contact AllianceOne and Risk Management Alternatives direct in order to come to some arragement regarding repayments"

 

No reference to any other part of the complaint.

 

So does this mean they have SOLD the debt on, or just assigned a third party collection agent as their in house wallies Mercers were a waste of space. Am I not obliged to receive some sort of formal notice of assigment?

 

Also how do I find out were the payments I have been making direct to B/card have been going for the last 6 months?

 

Surely they should of informed me months ago that these accounts had been dumped on someone else and cannot accept money for an account they no longer have in their possession?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a letter today after months of complaining to B/Card about lack of information regarding the account/s, telephone harrassment, no default notice, no statements and no reply to token payment offer.

 

They say

"I can confirm that these account have been passed on. Barlaycard are no longer in possession of these accounts and you should contact AllianceOne and Risk Management Alternatives direct in order to come to some arragement regarding repayments"

 

No reference to any other part of the complaint.

 

So does this mean they have SOLD the debt on, or just assigned a third party collection agent as their in house wallies Mercers were a waste of space. Am I not obliged to receive some sort of formal notice of assigment?

 

Also how do I find out were the payments I have been making direct to B/card have been going for the last 6 months?

 

Surely they should of informed me months ago that these accounts had been dumped on someone else and cannot accept money for an account they no longer have in their possession?

 

 

Hi,

 

 

It's difficult to say from their reply. They should have told you if they have sold the accounts.

 

I imagine you will be contacted soon enough from this new lot!

 

When they do, you can CCA them!

 

 

Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

 

It's difficult to say from their reply. They should have told you if they have sold the accounts.

 

I imagine you will be contacted soon enough from this new lot!

 

When they do, you can CCA them!

 

 

Jeff.

 

These other clowns have been on my case for months with no confirmation from B/Card about passing or selling the debt on until today.

Both been CCA'ed, Still waiting to hear back.

 

So I think B/Card have had their last token payment out of me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

These other clowns have been on my case for months with no confirmation from B/Card about passing or selling the debt on until today.

Both been CCA'ed, Still waiting to hear back.

 

So I think B/Card have had their last token payment out of me.

 

 

Hi alf,

 

 

In that case, just sit back until they default and commit an offence, then report them to all concerned!

 

You can then also write to them all pointing out their misgivings!

 

 

Regards, Jeff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Hi

 

I'm new to this forum, got a few depts with credit cards.

One of the companies are Barclaycard, which has sent my dept to mercers (Barclaycard) who inturn have past it onto Power2Contact.

I had a doorstep call from Power2Contact today demanding money well i say he was demanding money. I just told him to leave and showed him my two dogs he soon left lol. Trouble is i'm on Benefits and also a full time carer looking after my Father and certainly can't pay what there asking for.

 

Gary

Link to post
Share on other sites

firstly i would be inclined to start your own thread, that way you will get alot more info specific to your plight rather than tailending a thread started 2 yrs ago. do one for each card/debt if necessary.

 

you will need to find out things like how old is the debt, when was your last payment. etc

then people will be able to guide you correctly.

 

though obviously, if you are getting things like carers allowance etc etc, it will make case easier to deal with.

 

as it seems this BC debt has been passed around abit, i bet no-one has got the paperwork anyhow to chase you. so looks good there!

 

i'll watch for your new threads

oh and do some reading, the more you read the stronger you become.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...