Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

eurodebt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4970 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

can anyone please give me any advice about eurodebt, as my inlaws are paying them a set amount per month, but thier creditor's are not recieving the stated level of payments and when they are paid it is late.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd never heard of eurodebt before, but apparently they've been around since 1996 - and they're quite a large reputable company!! (So I'm told)

 

Don't worry too much about creditors claiming they've not had their money, or it's late or whatever. They'll be getting their money alright, this is just part of the fun and games.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/66897-debt-management-organisations.html?highlight=payplan

 

The cut-throat competition created by traditional DCA's competing with the ultra nasty purchase agencies means that many are now prepared to bypass DMP's or third parties altogether.....but they need to employ a few tricks and devious ways to get you to reopen negotiations with them directly....at your peril!!!

 

Eurodebt will probably advise you better on this, but my personal opinion for what it's worth, is that any contact from DCA's should be redirected to eurodebt and you should not try to deal with them yourself. If creditors start to pester you directly again, get onto Eurodebt and tell them what's happening. They should be able to deal with this for you.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

can anyone please give me any advice about eurodebt, as my inlaws are paying them a set amount per month, but thier creditor's are not recieving the stated level of payments and when they are paid it is late.

 

Simple...! Stop this now!

 

Work out their own pro-rata budget and pay it direct. Cut out the middle man and the hassle that goes with it. That said, if you'ld rather have a middle man then i'ld suggest (and reccomend) CCCS, it's free as well!

 

CCCS -

 

Good luck, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guy's

 

thanks for your quick reply's. So what can my in-law's do about the letters from thier creditors. Do they just inform eurodebt and leave it up to them. Or do they contact thier creditors and state that all comunication must go through eurodebt instead.

 

They also have contacted thier local eurodebt rep, asking for a complete breakdown of where all thier money that is being taken out of their account has gone.

 

thanks

 

mick

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

all eurodebt are is stealth ROBBERS

 

they led my fiance to believe she was having an IVA and would all be over in 3 years. this was 3 years ago, although the amount she was paying etc i thought they had put her on a debt management plan which is totally different she carried on. last year she found out she was actualyy on a DMP and NOT an IVA and she would be paying for probably at least 30 years with the amount she was paying. so after some thought she went bankrupt and she was discharge less than a year later. initially she had to pay for 3 years but when her circumstances changed they suspended this and may close the whole account off.

moral of the story

 

DONT USE EURODEBT.

 

no complaints have been made because my fiance just wants that part of her life behind her but left to me i would have gone to the top preying on vunerable people like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

My father in law was referred to Eurodebt by a friend of his and he has nothing but good to say about the company and the advisor who came out to see him.

They carried out a full analysis of his income and household spendings and have dealt with all the debt collectors and creditors who were constantly calling him.

He did talk to the Consumer Credit counselling service but had to deal with them over the phone and complete all the paperwork themselves.

Pa In Law was happy to pay for Eurodebt's services to deal with his problems & they've done all they said they would.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My father in law was referred to Eurodebt by a friend of his and he has nothing but good to say about the company and the advisor who came out to see him.

They carried out a full analysis of his income and household spendings and have dealt with all the debt collectors and creditors who were constantly calling him.

He did talk to the Consumer Credit counselling service but had to deal with them over the phone and complete all the paperwork themselves.

Pa In Law was happy to pay for Eurodebt's services to deal with his problems & they've done all they said they would.

 

Slow day at Eurodebt:flypig:

 

EuroDebt director Kevin Still said: "With over 870,000 complaints it would suggest that we should have serious concerns over the quality of service and transparency of fees with such a high number of complaints in a six-month period regarding banking and loans.

Eurodebt

An agent from Eurodebt Ltd came to see Tara Cooper.

 

Tara says, "The agent was very pushy and insisted I paid him, before he left. I wrote out three post dated cheques totalling £1,200".

The service wasn't cheap. As well as an upfront fee of £1,200, Tara was to pay £53 monthly to Eurodebt Ltd.

Of that £35 went to the company - just £18 would be passed on to creditors.

Tara started to feel that out of her monthly fee, not enough was going to the creditors.

Debt management companies have to operate within guidelines set by the Office of Fair Trading.

Credit Action is a charity which gives free advice to people in debt.

Keith Tondeur from the charity says that Eurodebt Ltd must do things according to the law:

"They're perfectly legal - but certain things must be explained.

"To get someone to sign post-dated cheques at a first meeting is a clear breach of guidelines."

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/politics_show/7852225.stm

 

Definitely strongly advise that this outfit is given a very wide berth, they have no intention of helping anyone in debt, why would you pay a fee when you are already in debt, and you can do the job far quicker cheaper and more professionally than any outfit that simply makes a gain out of your misery, kick these muppets into touch ASAP..

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just complained direct via E mail to this outfit. They keep calling and writing to me best one they didn't pay postage on one and I was charged by the post office. I thaught it was important documents that I missed (house sale) and when I went to collect was nothing more than thier junk mail. £1.35 what a flaming cheek. lso seems that they are trolling county courts for people with CCJ's THEN WRIING TO OFFER HELP TO THEM INCLUDING THE COURT REF NUMBERS :shock:

wonder what we can do about them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No just answer and laugh at them, every question they ask, just reply with laughter, if you've got the laughing policeman put that on and play that to them.

or blow rasperries down the phone.....oh boy, I am sooooo childish!:dance:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Eurodebt are connected with the Credit Expert bloke, they DO troll court lists and send debtors letters (mine was on yellow/orange paper) and tell them they can help get the debt paid and not on your record....

 

Well in my case Eurodebt went sniffing up the wrong tree cos I did owe the money and was waiting for the court to decide that it was just the original sum owed, which was agreed and paid in a week.. I complained to Trading Standards about Eurodebt and was told that there was little I could do as the court lists are in the public domain.

 

The whole set up stinks if you ask me, court lists should NOT be public property to be bought and sold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bazooka its good to be daft now and again I plan to use my sons posterior for the raspberries as he is a master of the "trade" fsamily joke says that he has enough windpower to keep britain going for the next century LOL

 

seriously silly girl though Is sick they should use tactics like that to drum up buisiness my ccj@s are already deal with and the compnies know that they are to be paid within the next few weeks so I don't need services from them at all. Thing is they charge through the nose for thier services for people that are already in trouble and they could make matters worse what happens if they default on the DMP payments will they start court proceedings against them as well getting them into a worse and worse situation. AS everyone says use CCCS CAB PayPLan or any free services. OH BTW about pst you know who the masgazine has just sent a photographer over monday for pics will let you know when its to be run

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

if they call again just ask them to take your name off the list as they will have to by law, also just make sure you dont do any surveys or when you apply for stuff make sure you tick the box that says you dont allow ur details to be passed on to other companies offering there services.

This is how they get your info and same as the courts any ccj as soon as its passed in court it will go on the public domain the same day and there is nothing you can do about it unless you dont let a ccj happen to your self

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...