Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Spreadsheet with interest


bram stoker
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1881 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Just a quick one, are the spreadsheets you provide on Google under Vampyress Chambers - the same as the ones you provide in the CAG Library eg. Complex bank charges England etc??

 

It's just that I note there has been talk about claiming for contractural interest and the one I filled in on from the CAG library (Complex bank charges England) just asks for the interest date, interest charges, and account balance at interest date. Should I be using the Google spreadsheets instead, or is the Library fully updated?

 

I just need to know if I need to refill this all out again!

 

Thanks to Vampiress for her fabulous sheets!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vampiress,

you are a legend! I have a query on the spreadsheet I have been using in the Library (England Complex Bank charges Excel). I filled in everything as you said in your notes and in the sheet itself. It seems to automatically calculate the portion of interest charged on the penalty, given the account balance, date interest charged, date penalty charged etc. Is this right?!!

 

Another point - I see the talk about contractural interest - of course it's perfectly fair and logical to claim back the rate of interest at which you were charged. But what if you were charged different rates of interest at different times. Eg. the Natwest authorised borrowing rate for 2006 (so far) is 29.6% annually (2.19%/month) and the authorised borrowing rate for 2006 is something like 16.9%. The rates of course have gone up over the 6 years, so are differing rates.

 

Can I assume that by filling in the Excel spreadsheet in the library taking into account I've inputted the correct information - penalty charged, date charged, interest charged, date interest charged, account balance at interest date - that this automatically calculates the correct interest?

 

Does that make sense?

Thanks, just want to make sure that I am claiming for as near to the amount

I have actually been charged as possible.

i.e. over the last 6 years Natwest has charged me £3,172.00 in penalties and the spreadsheet has calculated that the interest charged on penalties is £987.74.

 

The actual full amount of the interest I was charged by Natwest over the 6 years was £1,578.56. So £590.82 was paid in 'legitimate' interest and £987.74 was paid in unlawful interest.

 

Does this sound right to everyone, as I am about to send my Prelim letter.

 

Thanks all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick one, are the spreadsheets you provide on Google under Vampyress Chambers - the same as the ones you provide in the CAG Library eg. Complex bank charges England etc??
Yes, they are basically the same, although there are some updates, such as displaying the daily rate etc. You also have a choice to use a spreadsheet for other scenarios that you may prefer, such as compounding the interest. There are also more spreadsheets available for people who are claiming in Scotland.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vampiress,

you are a legend!

Thanks.:)
I have a query on the spreadsheet I have been using in the Library (England Complex Bank charges Excel). I filled in everything as you said in your notes and in the sheet itself. It seems to automatically calculate the portion of interest charged on the penalty, given the account balance, date interest charged, date penalty charged etc. Is this right?!!
It is a good estimate. Others have gone on to calculate this more accurately. I wanted to keep these as simple as possible, and if the bank wish to recalculate, it's up to you and your bank to negotiate this figure. Remember to be reasonable. Remember also that the banks in court must defend their costs before defending any interest on them.
Another point - I see the talk about contractural interest - of course it's perfectly fair and logical to claim back the rate of interest at which you were charged. But what if you were charged different rates of interest at different times. Eg. the NatWest authorised borrowing rate for 2006 (so far) is 29.6% annually (2.19%/month) and the authorised borrowing rate for 2006 is something like 16.9%. The rates of course have gone up over the 6 years, so are differing rates.
Again, an estimate. Feel free to produce something more accurate and research your historic rates from your own bank account. Remember that you may have switched from one type of account to another within that time period, each type of account carrying different rates. Again, I wanted to keep it simple.
Can I assume that by filling in the Excel spreadsheet in the library taking into account I've inputted the correct information - penalty charged, date charged, interest charged, date interest charged, account balance at interest date - that this automatically calculates the correct interest?
I qualified at maths to A' level standard, and have studied and worked as an accountant for the last 15 years. The theory and the maths have been checked by others. I'm confident the spreadsheets are correct, but am always open to criticism. Keeping a balance between simplicity for everyone, and accuracy, is a judgement call. Others may wish to calculate their interest differently.
Does that make sense?
Absolutely. It's good to have chance to explain these things and to be called to answer occasionally. I know the spreadsheets have helped many, and hope they continue to do so.
Thanks, just want to make sure that I am claiming for as near to the amount I have actually been charged as possible.
It states in the small claim pack to over-estimate your claim if you are not sure. The judge and defendant can barter you down, but you will find it difficult to increase your claim if you've under-estimated.
i.e. over the last 6 years Natwest has charged me £3,172.00 in penalties and the spreadsheet has calculated that the interest charged on penalties is £987.74.

 

The actual full amount of the interest I was charged by Natwest over the 6 years was £1,578.56. So £590.82 was paid in 'legitimate' interest and £987.74 was paid in unlawful interest.

 

Does this sound right to everyone, as I am about to send my Prelim letter.

That sounds fine, although maybe a little low if you've had a lot of charges. Without seeing the whole picture, you can't really judge the accuracy of the figures given in questions such as these. You appear to have grasped the concepts well, and am sure you will do fine.

 

Good luck.:)

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it possible to alter the spreadsheets to allow for the entry of charges older than six years with the date they actually occured instead of a bulk amount?

Just some guy. I try to help, but all advice is my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Vampiress. So in other words - the one I have been using in the library, will correctly calculate the amount of interest I have paid on the penalty charges (as long as I input the correct amounts of course). So £987.74 interest sounds right for £3,172.00 worth of penalties? I am about to send it out so I don't want to make any obvious errors!

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The spreadsheet doesn't need any alteration.

 

Am I missing something? I have had a look at the advanced Bank charges sheet and when I enter an pre 2001 date I get "#N/A did not find value 01/01/2001" in the interest column.

Just some guy. I try to help, but all advice is my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I missing something? I have had a look at the advanced Bank charges sheet and when I enter an pre 2001 date I get "#N/A did not find value 01/01/2001" in the interest column.
If you are using the Google spreadsheets you need to enter dates in American format as stated in the Chambers. Some formulae will also not work until you have completed a few entries.

 

Let me know if this doesn't work please.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have just filed out the spreadsheet ready for court the tota charges came out at £2303.50 when this was entered on the p column the 8% interest was all over the shop they ranged from 10.88 to over £200 the total with the interest was over £9000 this is surelly incorect :confused: :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have just filed out the spreadsheet ready for court the tota charges came out at £2303.50 when this was entered on the p column the 8% interest was all over the shop they ranged from 10.88 to over £200 the total with the interest was over £9000 this is surelly incorect :confused: :confused:
Which spreadsheet please?

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

vampiress have they altered the spreadsheet lately as the spreadsheet i have used is different to ones on here i have the one with a the writing on the left and you side shift the screen and put all you bank account details at top and then fil out the charges below this hope this is not getting to u

Link to post
Share on other sites

vampiress have they altered the spreadsheet lately as the spreadsheet i have used is different to ones on here i have the one with a the writing on the left and you side shift the screen and put all you bank account details at top and then fil out the charges below this hope this is not getting to u
Getting to me? C'mon I love a challenge. Lol.

 

The spreadsheets have been updated yes. I'm sending you a PM.:)

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

am new to threads - have been sat here ages:roll: HRS!:???:

 

i need help with the English simple version spread shet - its the days colum i'm struggling with - do i get all my calenders out since 2000 to calculate the time since the charge was made e.g 31/03/2003 is 1289 days?? or is there an easier way:confused: Would appreciate your advice. Thank you thank you thank you:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

am new to threads - have been sat here ages:roll: HRS!:???:

 

i need help with the English simple version spread shet - its the days colum i'm struggling with - do i get all my calenders out since 2000 to calculate the time since the charge was made e.g 31/03/2003 is 1289 days?? or is there an easier way:confused: Would appreciate your advice. Thank you thank you thank you:)

There was a formula in the days cell which calculated it automatically. If you have deleted it, you need to get it back in by copying it from a new template.

[

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

I have just joined the action group. Can anyone help me with a copy of the draft letters that I need to send to Lloyds TSB. I have been screwed by the bank for far too long. In the past 6 months, they have charged me +£350.00 in bank charges. My brother told me about this from listening to the radio, hence this is my first attempt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1881 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...