Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In short you never communicate with a Debt Collector, they have no power here at all. The snotty letter is only used to respond to a properly worded Letter Before Claim. The only time you would be recommended to contact the PPC is to send the snotty letter. You do nothing but keep the tripe they send you unless you receive a letter before claim.
    • Probably to do with the Creditor accepting the reduced payments claim as part of the IVA. - Thats my guess anyway.  As for the mount outstanding... 60k is incredible and im pretty sure a DRO wouldnt cover that much even after the new legislation.    For you @Alfy - Please stay headstrong and stop worrying. My viewpoint on debt with debt collectors is simple. You are a figure on a spreadsheet loaded into a database for them to run a collection cycle through.  They dont care about emotions or your situation, they just care about paying off their shareholders and trying to turn a profit.  They use varying tactics to increase the pressure on you to the point where you will break. People then fall for this an either cave in to DCAs before doing their own due diligence on the debts that are purchased or turn to IVAs like you have.    They are better ways to handle this and Im glad you feel better after a good nights sleep - I hope you can keep it up. 
    • Good afternoon,    I am writing in reference to the retail dispute number ****, between myself and Newton Autos concerning the sale of a Toyota Avensis which has been found to have serious mechanical faults.    As explained previously the car was found to be faulty just six days after purchase. The car had numerous fault codes that appeared on the dash board and went into limp mode. This required assistance from the AA and this evidence has already been provided. The car continues to exhibit these faults and has been diagnosed as having faults with the fuel injectors which will require major mechanical investigation and repairs.    Newton Autos did not make me aware of any faults upon purchase of the vehicle and sold it as being in good condition.    Newton Autos have also refused to honour their responsibilities under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 which requires them to refund the customer if the goods are found to be faulty and not fit for purpose within 30 days of purchase.    Newton Autos also refused to accept my rejection of the vehicle and refused to refund the car and accept the return of the vehicle.    It is clear to me that the car is not fit for purpose as these mechanical faults occurred so soon after purchase and have been shown to be present by both the AA and an independent mechanic.   Kind regards
    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do mediation and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out     .
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

british gas bringing in penalty charge from 1st March


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5535 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

just recieved this with my gas bill

 

Important changes to your terms and conditions

from 1st march 2007 , british gas will be introducing a late payment charge of £5 for late paying customers , an approach similar to that taken by many credit card companies where payment is late

 

why is it being introduced

british gas bill you for energy after you have used it .therefore when u recieve your bill we expect you to pay it promptly

while most british gas customers pay their energy bill on time , a small proportion of our customers consistently bay late , which results in costly follow up procedures

 

how will this change affect me

After 1st March 2007 , if you fail to pay your bill within 28 days of the bill date a £5 charge for late payment will be automatically added to the outstanding bill

 

The £5 charge represents our additional costs when a customer has not paid a bill within 28 days of the bill date

 

 

what can I do to avoid late payment charges

pay your bill on time - your bill will now show a a date by wich we should recieve your payment making it easir to pay your bill on time

A new game ... find all the faults lmao

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

POSTED ON BEHALF OF BOOKWORM

Important changes to your terms and conditions

from 1st march 2007 , british gas will be introducing a late payment charge of £5 for late paying customers , an approach similar to that taken by many credit card companies where payment is late - We admit it is not a representation of our loss, but we've seen others do it and rake huge profits from it, so we'll do it too.

why is it being introduced

british gas bill you for energy after you have used it .therefore when u recieve your bill we expect you to pay it promptly

while most british gas customers pay their energy bill on time , a small proportion of our customers consistently bay late , which results in costly follow up procedures - Really. Hmmm, and that would be?...

how will this change affect me

After 1st March 2007 , if you fail to pay your bill within 28 days of the bill date a £5 charge for late payment will be automatically added to the outstanding bill - Ah, there's your costly follow-up procedure!

 

The £5 charge represents our additional costs when a customer has not paid a bill within 28 days of the bill date - And those costs are???

 

BG are going to have problems with that one, methinks!

:lol:

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

British Gas is charging £5 for late payment of bills. If a customer doesn’t pay their bill within 28 days £5 will be added to the amount they owe - Daily Mail and GMTV.

British Gas has received coverage for charging customers 75p per minute on one of its telephone lines and not informing their customers - Daily Express, Daily Mail, Daily Telegraph and The Sun

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who thinks this announcement coming a week before the Fraud Act came into force (which would have criminalised it) is more than coincidence?

HSBCLloyds TSBcontractual interestNew Tax Creditscoming for you?NTL/Virgin Media

 

Never give in ... Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy. Churchill, 1941

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah, that would have required some serious joined-up thinking! If you ask CS they point - as justification - that 'other companies do it to encourage payment' and however when pressed on which utility companies charge, there wasn't an answer.

 

Incidentally, in business any invoiced amount could not be increased without the agreeement of the customer. The late payment interest charege rules changed this, but as I recall this did not apply to consumers, so it looks as though it'll have to be consumer action that ensures the penalties don;t apply. Those untilling ot too lazy to complain will simply pay it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Perhaps a warning shot across their bows from this site wouldn't be a bad idea.........................discuss.

 

When they realise what's going to happen & the extra staff they will need to employ they might think again. After all this site must have some muscle by now

Link to post
Share on other sites

They don't seem to pay much attention to anybody - and what few customers they have left aside, there remains the possibility the still might make more from it than they'll lose from challenges. What we need is a govenment to totally outlaw this type of charge, perhaps in the same legislation that moves the cost of processing customer payments to the recipient firm, instead of expecting customers to pay for it (like the DDM [problem]).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Apparently the new boss of British Gas has taken charge and promptly told BG to scrap this charge, because of the number of complaints and additional lost customers that it has caused. Reported in yesterday's (6th March) Daily Mail

 

Another victory for the common man.

MBNA - Agreed to refund £970 in full without conditions. Cheque received Sat 5th Aug.:D

Lloyds - Settled for an undisclosed sum.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

He has his work cut out then:confused:

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone come across a 'Penalty Charge' of £40 or £45 being imposed by British Gas for 'migrating' to another supplier, in my aunt's case, Scottish Power? I have obviously told her not to pay it and assured her that she won't have to either but I wondered if any other members had come across this in what appears to be a mass exodus from BG?

Link to post
Share on other sites

She may have agreed to a fixed price deal, which would - irrespective of her previous time as a customer - cause a minimum term of the new rates to kick in.

 

In these cases, similar to mobile phone minimum term contracts - she had to abide by her original agreement and wait for the end of the primary term, where she can leave without penalty.

 

If she forgot this, or still wants to leave to the other supplier, BG can rightfully add this fee to her last bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Guest 10110001
Simple Answer - just dont pay the extra £5, let them chase you in the courts for it

 

It will screw your credit rating.

 

Lending money for financial gain requires a Category A credit licence and to obtain one requires a person to be of good standing. If a firm can lawfully £5 for late payment then it nullifies the very purpose of having credit licenses.

 

Fees can now be used for unlicensed lending.

 

Anyone know what the OFT's position is on this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001

So how do we get them back? or better still stop this hgappening in the first place?

 

If its unlawful then why they doing it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...