Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

2024-01-11 Harrow PCN - Stopping in a Box Junction


Recommended Posts

 I Just got this ticket saying I was in a yellow box !

I never drive into boxes if I cant pass them likewise never drive in bus lanes not even when not operational.

The images they have sent me are a total joke

they say there is a video but this is not online and I have to apply in writing if I want to see it before appeal ! 

What do you think

My car is the one with the L shaped rear lights - They also have noted that my car make is unknown ????

 

pixs.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this a TfL pcn or local council? If TfL, they will put pcn on hold while they send you a copy ofthe video.

The stills in the pcn are supposed to be the ones that show a contravention took place. I can't see either car in contravention, so  you must get the video. It is the council's primary and only evidence

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was taken from a bus lane camera I think does that make it a tfl ticket?

Was sent on local council letterhead

- agreed no contravention here

in my opinion for a contravention to have of occurred then I would have had to sit in the box for the lights to change twice ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the exact wording on the letter?

Maybe upload it?

The video may or may not help.

I believe the Highway Code states that you must not enter the box unless the exit is clear.

So, yes you really need to see the full video.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

your exit was not clear. clearly states you stopped.

BUT regardless..you should not have entered the box junction unless your exit was clear.

following in a line of moving traffic is not an excuse.

as for:

23 hours ago, onestressedwoman said:

in my opinion for a contravention to have of occurred then I would have had to sit in the box for the lights to change twice ???

nope not true..wherever did you get that :noidea:from...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so how are they saying you stopped??

as you say this video is going to be pivotal then ..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 secs and 57secs timing of the two photos...

in those 43 seconds, you waited for the lights to turn green (poss twice?) but didnt move forward thru the box at all until there was enough room for you to completely exit the box (the 2nd photo?).

if so they are stuffed and time for an appeal via the correct forms.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed, the photos don't actually show a contravention. Ridiculous to issue a ticket on that evidence alone...

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a response to request for video also asking them to stop the clock on my 14 days to pay/appeal as below: I THINK THEY ARE LOOKING FOR FOOTAGE UNDER THEIR BED 

Thank you for your email.  

This is a confirmation that we are placing your Notice on hold whilst we investigate the matter. 

We aim to respond to 90% of queries within 15 working days although at peak times this may not be possible to do. 

To enable us to fully deal with your enquiry, please ensure you quote your name, vehicle registration number and Penalty Charge Notice Number (beginning HR…)  

Kind regards  

Parking Appeals Team 

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is called a soft appeal

unless they find the Video and show you stopped, should be gameover.

in the past we've seen magical photos appear from xxx council which shows the car in the stop box with red tail lights showing ... these are not proof.

the video must be produced.

if all else fails and they produce no VDO evidence , you can still use the forms pe2/3

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its a total liberty I really do

They have issued a fine which is unproven yet are willing to put people through stress for no reason - if they cannot produce video prior to 28 days of alleged contravention the fine does not stand anyway does it ?

 

I know I am thick but forms pe2/3 ??? what are these

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have not issued a fine.. only a court can fine anyone, they have issued a PCN.

the forms are on the homepage of this local authority etc forum .

click the forum name link up the vey top of your thread

Local Authority Parking and Traffic Offences - Consumer Action Group

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've been logging on regularly to see if there is any update to this ticket 

Today 3 images have now been uploaded the 2 original ones and now the one attached.

The council said they would put this ticket on hold until which time evidence has been provided, however I have had no correspondence from the local authority I only found this other image because I logged on?

They appear not to have upheld the ticket as it now says I owe £130 

 

Yellow box.pdf

Edited by Nicky Boy
Redaction on PDF
Link to post
Share on other sites

clearly shows you following another car so your exit could not have been clear upon your entry to the box.

and if you stopped....

thats why the video is SOOO important. 

if you did stop, sadly you owe.

showing brake your lights on in a still from a video is not proof you stopped.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed need the video

However should I just not appeal it now because they have raised the charge without informing me there is any more images to view and I also have it in writing that they would hold the ticket until the could provide evidence.

Also if it makes a difference I have not been provided with proof of alleged contravention within 28 days of the alleged offence

Date of alleged contravention 9th Jan - the images can only have been uploaded within the last 5 days as I have been checking regularly

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well TBH that photo shows you followed another car into the box, so as i've said several times, you are on the backfoot here already as you should not have done that anyway.

i would continue to press for the video.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

OH  DX they are driving me mad !

I requested footage to no response.

Spoke to local authority who said they have not followed due process in responding to my informal appeal.

I was told to write a letter to head of parking services detailing the mal administration as this is not right (his words)

I did as instructed and received a written response today telling me I have no right to appeal and they are going to issue court proceedings if payment not received within 14 days.

No mention of my being able to take this to appeals tribunal ? 

Still haven't produced any CCTV

How can I not have the right to take this to the parking tribunal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...