Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • be very wary upon what you see being recently posted on here 😎 regarding KIH.... all is not what it seems...  
    • 1st - all my posts on CAG are made not only in reply to the specific issue the topic starter makes but also in a general matter to advise any future readers upon the related subject - here it is kings interhigh online school. KIH lets take this topic apart shall we so readers know the real situation and the real truth...and underline the correct way to deal with KIH. https://tinyurl.com/ycxb4fk7 Kings Interhigh Online School issues - Training and Apprenticeships - Consumer Action Group - but did not ever reply to the last post.  but the user then went around every existing topic here on CAG about KIH pointing to the above topic and the 'want' to make some form of group  promoting some  'class action' against KIH . then on the 2nd march this very topic this msg is in was created. all remarkably similar eh? all appear to be or state..they are in spain... ....as well as the earlier post flaunting their linkedin ID, (same profile picture) that might have slipped through via email before our admin killed it.., trying to give some kind of legitimacy to their 'credentials' of being 'an honest poster'....oh and some kind of 'zen' website using a .co.uk  address (when in spain- bit like the Chinese ebay sallers) they run ... and now we get the father of the bride ...no sorry...father of a child at the uk-based international school in question posting ...pretending to be not the 'other alf... do you really think people are that stupid..... ................... nope you never owed that in the 1st place... wake up you got had and grabbed the phone - oh no they are taking me to court under UK jurisdiction...and fell for every trick in the book that they would never ever put in writing that could be placed in front of a court operating under their stated uk jurisdiction wherever you live. T&C's are always challengeable under UK law this very site would not exist if it were not for the +£Bn's bank charges reclaiming from 2006> and latterly the +£Bn's of PPI reclaiming both directly stated in the banks' T&C's were they claimed they were legally enforceable ...not!! they lost big time... why? a waste of more money if you've not got a court claim....... why not use them for a good outcome...go reclaim that £1000 refundable deposit you got scammed out of . people please research very carefully ...you never know who any of these people are that are posting about kings interhigh and their 'stories' they could even be one of their online tutors or a shill . don't get taken in. dx      
    • @KingsParent thank you for sharing your experience.  I also tried contacting the CEO but didn’t get very far. Do you mind sharing his contact details?  kind regards   
    • Thank you Rocky for the clarifications though they did cause a problem at first since an original windsccreen ticket was  of a different breach some time before. The current windscreen ticket only states that you were parked there for 6 minutes which is just one minute over the minimum time allowed as the Consideration period. There is no further proof that you parked there for any longer than that is there? More photographs for example? Moving on to the Notice to Keeper-it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. First there is no parking period mentioned on it. there is the time 20.25 stated which coincides with the W/S ticket but a parking period must have a starting and finishing time-just one time is insufficient to qualify as a parking  period as required in Section 9 [2] [a] . Are there any different photos shown on the NTK comapared to the w/s PCN? Not that that would make a difference as far as PoFA goes since the times required by PoFA should be on the NTK but at the moment Met only appear to show that you stayed there for 6 minutes. Another failure to comply with PoFA is at S9([2][e] where their wording should be "the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; ". You can see on your NTK that they misssed off the words in brackets. Met cannot therefore transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable. Then their is the discrepancy with the post code on the NTK  HA4 0EY which differs from the post code on the contract and the Post Office Postcode Finder which both list it as HA4 0FY. As you were not parked in HA4 0EY the breach did not occur. In the same way as if you were caught speeding in the Mall in London, yet you were charged with speeding in Pall mall London [a street nearby] you would be found not guilty since though you were speeding you were not speeding in Pall Mall. I bow to Eric's brother on his reasoning on post 12 re the electric bay abuse  That wording is not listed on their signs nor is there any mention on the contract of any electric charging points at all let alone who can park there or use them. He is quite right too that the entrance sign is merely an invitaion to treat it cannot form a contrct with motorists. Also the contract looks extremely  short no doubt there will be more when we see the full Witness statement. As it stands there is no confirmation from Standard Life [or Lift !] on the contract that Savills are able to act on their behalf. Also most contracts are signed at the end of the contract to prevent either side adding extra points. So their percentage  chance of winning their case would be somewhere between 0.01 and 0.02.    
    • Owners of older vehicles tell the BBC of their anger that their cars' apps will stop working.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Together Property - should a deed of variation be part of the management pack about the property? exorbitant cost!


YasminD

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

hope you well

I came across your post published last year about Together Property formerly known as Hamilton Kings. We reside in Willesden Green and currently our property is undergoing completion but are experiencing major issues with the wild costs quoted by TP, pertaining to Deeds of variation which surpasses the legal market range. Please can anyone advise on the following 

should the deed of variation be part of the management pack about the property because we are told its a separate document ? Given the cost it’s hindering us selling our property. 
 

if we request SAR would that be helpful as they will need to provide everything about the property 
 

look forward to your advice 

Thank you 

Yasmin 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Together Property - should a deed of variation be part of the management pack about the property? exorbitant cost!

thread title updated

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Couple of Questions if you don't mind:

How long have you been in your present property?

Is the Property Leasehold or owned?

If Leasehold have you checked your Leasehold Agreement for any Clauses about variation that TP are referring to i.e. Ground Rent?

Exactly what Deed of Variation are TP trying to do just an example is it for Ground Rent? (check you leasehold Agreement for the Clauses)

Do you have a Management Company over seeing the Management of the Properties of is it Together Property if so when were they appointed?

Could you post in PDF only a redacted copy of your Leasehold Agreement and TP Deed of Variation? (so we can check your Lease Clauses & TP Deed of Variation)  (see my signature below and click on How to Upload)

So a Deed of Variation is a Legal Document that will also be required to be registered with the Land Registry

In your case if the Freeholder has appointed Together Property as the Managing Agent for the Building you reside in and you have a Leasehold Agreement (you need to fully check the Clauses) and if any refer to what Together Property are applying for a Deed of Variation just as an example Ground Rent and that Clause is contained in your Leasehold Agreement then this is also a Variation to your Leasehold Agreement (not as Together Property seems to be claiming it is separate)

Basically if Leasehold and the Freeholder has Appointed Together Property to Manage the Property they are acting on behalf of the Freeholder and if there are Clauses within your Lease Agreement for example Ground Rent they are then making a Variation to your Leasehold Agreement and the Deed of Variation needs to registered with the Land Registry 

We really need more information

 

If Leasehold these may be of interest to you with the present Bill going through Parliament:

Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill

BILLS.PARLIAMENT.UK

 

Leasehold reforms give more rights and protections to homeowners:

WWW.GOV.UK

Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill introduced to Parliament today will give homeowners a fairer deal, and greater rights and protections.

 

Guide to the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill:

WWW.GOV.UK

Information relating to the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill which was introduced to Parliament on 27 November 2023.

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stu 

Thank you so much for coming back to me

We've owned the property for nearly 17 years as a leaseholder and TP are the management company and the freeholders are Southern Land Securities. 

We are in the process of selling our property and the first obstacle encountered was the Freeholder and TP couldn't provide proof of the loft conversion application that it was approved and said it was our responsibility to ensure this despite purchasing the property in situ, I then had to call the Local Authority to get all the relevant paper work to prove permission was sought and application approved. Which solved that matter. 

2nd obstacle, the current plan does not demise the roof crawl spaces and the red lines do not go into eaves on the plan, they are saying from their standpoint the deed of variation is required, which they are charging nearly £8000.  We don't think its necessary but the buyer is requesting it, despite having the certificate for the loft conversation from Local Authority and Documents from Land Registry to say all is above board and no issues.  if we can't provide the Deed of Variation to include the eaves and crawl spaces as this is why its needed we can lose the sale because we can't afford the fee they have quoted which is astronomical 

My thinking is we have been living in the property without any prior need for the Deed of Variation and using those spaces without any issue its part of the property. My question is, why are TP and Freeholder are saying it is required

Hope am making sense, this is my first time going through this. I can upload all the documents requested on Monday. 

How do you think  we should respond and do you think we should requested SAR 

Also, Southern Land Security brought our property via an auction in 1996 and we moved in 2007 (some background)

Thank you so much for your help and look forward to hearing back 

YasminD 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I assume the Loft Conversion with the eaves and crawl space was there when you initially purchased the property. Even in done after purchasing the property and the correct permissions were in place i.e. Local Authority, Land Registry, Freeholder which is Southern Land which would be required as a Leasehold property.

The difficulty is if the Loft Conversion was there when you purchased the property and there is no evidence in your documents of the eaves and crawl space due to where the Red Lines stop in the plans or even after purchase it was added this is the reason you are having issues with selling due to those missing Red Lines in the Plans and any other Buyers competent Solicitor would flag this up.

I can understand the reasons the Buyer wishes a Deed of Variation probably there Solicitor requesting this to ensure those missing red
lines are covered before the Sale as they Flagged this as an issue as Red Lines missing on Plans and want buyer protected.

As for the £8000 costs Together and cohort Southern Land are trying to charge have you thought of contacting a few Property Solicitors yourself to get a few quotes. (only mention this because when I research this possible costs can range from £500 - £2000 depending on the Deed of Variation work required and nothing to stop you doing this then approaching Together and cohorts with it)

Also ask Together/Southern Land for a breakdown of the £8000 costs for the Deed of Variation.

Yup do send both Together and Southern Land a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that data in whether it be emails, written, recorded calls etc. They then have 30 Calendar Days to respond and that time limit only starts once they acknowledge receipt of your SAR Request.

When you purchased the property some 17yrs ago are the Solicitors that you went through at that time still operating? (I know probably a silly question but if they are nothing to stop you contacting them and asking them about this especially if the Loft Conversion was in place when you purchased the property)

Another link that will be useful to you as Leasehold is The Leasehold Advisory Service:

WWW.LEASE-ADVICE.ORG

Government funded, independent advice for residential leaseholders and park home residents

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stu

Thank you for coming back to me. 

The crawl and eaves spaces are within our 2 bedrooms and bathroom and was there before we moved in we haven't touched anything

Given we brought it 17 years ago the solicitor is no longer in operation

The buyers solicitor said they would be happy if TP and Southern Land Security can assure this even with an email as they understand the cost quoted of £8000 is astronomical. But its TP and Southern Land Security are stating its required so they can charge the cost mentioned for the DOV. We have had a quote from our solicitor saying they could do it for us all in at £400.00 plus VAT but they refused and said they have to do it so they can charge this silly price
 

I will ask for SAR and gently demand that they have to include it in the plans as its part of the rooms without the requirement of DOV otherwise we will lose the sale and are stuck and take legal action

what do you think? 

Thank you for the link and all your help much appreciated 

Saima 

 


 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

This is going to be difficult if Together and Southern Land are sticking to their Guns and still demanding they do the DOV with that extortionate Costs when your own Solicitor says they will do it for so much less.

Together and Southern Land must have known about this since as you mention the Loft Conversion was there with the eaves and Crawl Space when you purchased the Property but as it wasn't picked up when you purchased the property they are going down this DOV route with those costs.

I think you may have to get your Solicitor to write to them for a full explanation as to why your Solicitor cannot carry out this DOV.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Yup get a SAR off to them.

They know full well what they are doing with those costs and also know you need to go through the Freeholder Southern Land Securities for this but it even though your own Solicitor is willing to do the DOV for so so much less cost.

I know I said to get your Solicitor to ask them to ask for a full explanation as to why they can't do the DOV but also get them to ask for the following as well:

1. A full breakdown of there costs to reach £8000 for DOV

2. Is the DOV work being carried out by Southern Land Securities in house Solicitor Helen Louise O'Neill who is SRA Regulated.

 

The reason I say to mention number 2. is because Southern Land Securities in not SRA Regulated but there Legal Dept Solicitor Helen Louise O'Neill is SRA Regulated thus that Solicitor could be reported to the SRA but depends on how they work out this breakdown of costs.

The following links I would make your own Solicitor fully aware of also had a good read of them yourself:

WWW.SRA.ORG.UK

The Solicitors Register is a service for checking a solicitor or firm that is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

 

WWW.SRA.ORG.UK

The Solicitors Register is a service for checking solicitors or firms that are regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

 

SOLICITORS.LAWSOCIETY.ORG.UK

 

SOLICITORS.LAWSOCIETY.ORG.UK

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stu

Thank you so much! This is excellent information I feel empowered as I was at a loss prior speaking to you
 

From discussing this with you two things need to happen

1. Obtain SAR immediately containing the words All Data using the template you guided me to and modify accordingly. Can the request be sent electronically or does it have to be postal? 

2. Query there cost of £8000 with breakdown highlighting our solicitor can do it for considerably a lot less and mention the two points you raised above 

Thank you so much 

YasminD 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Something I forgot to add to my previous post when contacting your own Solicitor is:

You could also ask your Solicitor to also inform Southern Land that their charges for a Deed of Variation are outrageous and frustrating the process with a threat of bringing it to the attention of the SRA. (thanks to @Andyorch for pointing that out)

  • Like 1

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thank you for all your advice have sent the SAR and our solicitor has gone back saying costs associated to DOV are unreasonable and to share the full breakdown. Southern Land Security has appointed Brendan Millward to carry out the DOV . Oppose to the person you mentioned Helen. 
 

We are awaiting the breakdown

 Thank you 

Sorry Brendan Milward 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I think your Solicitor needs to ask Southern Land if Brendan Milward is their Legal Clerk or which company they are employing which he works for.

I have a feeling this Brendan Milward is their own Legal Clerk just google 'Southern Land Securities and Brendan Milward' and look at what pops up in fact I would even mention it to your Solicitor because when you google its amazing the cases that pop up and there is this Brendan Milward's name. 

Even if this individual is a Legal Clerk for another company southern land have employed to do the DOV the £8000 costs are still extortionate

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stu

Thank you for coming back to me. They are insistent that their costs are reasonable despite us mentioning that our solicitor can do it for £450 plus VAT. I googled him and seen the number of cases he has undertaken . We are at a loss and don’t know what to do. We have sent a final email and praying they agree to our solicitor carrying out the DOV. I sent a bunch of questions and they completely ignored it. Not sure what steps to take. What would you advise. We feel so helpless and stuck, because we cant afford their quote and will lose the sale. 

Thank you  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I would have got your Solicitor to ask what I mentioned not yourself as they will just ignore or not answer what you ask as you have found out but if your Solicitor asks that's a different matter and I know there would be a fee for your Solicitor to do that for you but may be the only way around this.

1. Full Breakdown of there DOV cost of £8000

2. Is Brendan Milward a Legal Clerk for Southern Land or a Different Company and if so which Company.

4. The DOV cost are outrageous and frustrating the process with a threat of bringing it to the attention of the SRA

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stu 

Will do but in the meantime they have said if we dont want to pay their fees for the DOV and given the eaves and crawl spaces arent on the lease plan we can either pay their fee £8000 or we can seal them. 

Basically they are playing dirty, the fact we have been using them for the past 17 years without issue and no where in our contract it says we cant use the space. What do you think we should do. Their is a part of me that wants to take them to court but not sure how it will hold up. Do you think speak to a litigation lawyer? 
 

thanks 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

There is the issue them stating the eaves and crawl space are not on the lease plan which should have been picked up by your Solicitor at the time of purchasing the property and as you have stated previously then no longer exist.

They may no longer exist but if you know that Solicitors details i.e. there full name have you thought to do a SRA Register Search to see if they are still working even with another company?

WWW.SRA.ORG.UK

The Solicitors Register is a service for checking a solicitor or firm that is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

As they are sticking to there guns speaking to you I know it will cost you to do this but it may be the only way is to get your Solicitor to ask those questions I mentioned and anything else they may advise you they should ask at the same time

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

He did ask those questions and they are stoic that there fee is more then reasonable and have said that they will carry out the DOV. They said nearly £6000 is for the consideration and the rest is legal and admin, our solicitor went back and fid say it was outrageous fee. But they dont care and say its more then reasonable 

Im sure being here for 17 years without any issues we have ground. Am speaking to my lawyer today so lets see. 
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So 2K for the actual submission of the DOV (normal fee inc court fee and prep £350/400) and £6k for consideration .I wonder how consideration id quantified and calculated ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...