Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Standard form being sent to large numbers of claimants. Just answer as the form asks.  No need to  go into any detail, unless the forms asks for specific details of how health impacts on daily activities. If you are worried contact Citizens Advice as they are experts with PIP, as they are trained to understand what evidence is required for assessments.
    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Premier/Gladstones ANPR PCN Claimforms - CAPITAL SHOPPING PARK LECKWITH ROAD CARDIFF CF11 8EG


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 218 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If by some horror you decided to pay, you would have a month to do so from judgement, so don't send in the N244 too quickly, there are a few things to consider first.  I'm at work now but promise to look in this evening, if others haven't explained in the meantime.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I’m in a difficult position with this I think now. We’re about to start looking for a family car and I don’t know how this will affect me in the immediate future. 
 

I also don’t really know exact where I stand and what the steps are now as some people have said I need to send off a form and then others are saying not yet etc and to complain but I don’t know what I need to do as of right now 

 

thanks everyone

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to appeal it you have to submit N244.

The decision is if you want to appeal or not.

 

You can complain but complaint will normally come back and say N244 anyway

Edited by jk2054

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Complaints process

WWW.GOV.UK

How to raise a complaint or give general feedback about the service HMCTS provides.

 

You could always wait for the complaint outcome before N244 but either way you need to do N244 to appeal

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you today?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I apologise for posting in dribs & drabs but I'm at work.  I'll write properly later this evening.

Don't panic and don't rush into things.

jk2054 is right.  Think things through logically & legally.  There is also a claimant here - yes, a company we despise, but they have the right to be heard by the court too.  At the moment they have won the court case.  By all means complain to the court, but that won't mean the judgement will disappear, a hearing will need to be held where the claimant has the right to give their opinion too. 

The N244 is your application for this hearing to set aside judgement.  The process is very easy.  But it needs to be prepared properly, calmly.

More in three hours or so.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1.  OK.  By all means complain to the court if you're certain they've messed up.  A complaint can only help you.  But it won't cancel the judgement.

2.  If you're tempted to give in, then as long as you pay within the 30 days from judgement, there will be no consequences.  No CCJ.  No problem buying the car.  CCJs are only used to punish people who defy court orders.

3.  But you have to do something - either pay and satisfy the judgement, or apply to have it set aside (the correct term is "set aside", not "appeal", I don't want to be pernickety but it's important you use the right term in the paperwork to the court).

One thing you can do is write to Premier Park and invite them to agree to set aside by consent.  It's highly unlikely they will agree.  But always worth a try.  You can do it by e-mail, there's nothing to lose now.  Send it both to  [email protected]  and to  [email protected] 

Dear Premier Park,

Re: PCN no.XXXXX, Claim Form no.XXXXX

as you know , the court has entered judgement in your favour regarding this matter.

This was because the court mislaid the defence I filed, and in the next few days I will be applying to the court to set aside judgement.

The purpose of this mail is to invite you to consent to set aside.  One of the parties is going to end up with very hefty costs at the end of all this, so it is in everyone's interests to keep costs low.  After all, you know full well what was going on in the car park on the day my vehicle was parked there.

I will wait 48 hours for your reply and if you do not consent I will apply for set aside anyway.

Yours XXXXX

Get that sent off tonight, both yourself and your MIL.

I would have liked to beef it up, by using details in the PCN, but I see it is missing from the thread.

BTW, what happened to your BIL's ticket?

Next, the good news is that if the other party balls it up, such as sending the paperwork to the wrong address, the court can set aside the judgement.  But if it is the court that has ballsed up, the court must set aside judgement.  So you need proper evidence that this is the court's fault.  After sending the above e-mail, you need to gather that evidence in preparation for your N244.

Edited by FTMDave
Correct e-mail addresses added

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

My mother in law has had an email back from the court saying about filling out the N244 form and that there is a £275 fee to send it off?!? 

It does say on the letter that there is a fee but I’m just going to have to pay the £282.49 because the fee for that N244 is £275 so what’s the point in paying the N244 fee with the possibility of not winning a court case and CCJ against me and then losing that too and having to pay over £500. 
 

I still want to make an official complaint to the court because it’s their fault my defence wasn’t filed. Can I take them to court? 😂😂

Link to post
Share on other sites

you will automictically get the fee back or even not have to pay it at all if the court coughs to it being their mistake. 

there other threads here where this happened but ive not time to find it. just now

dont forget you have a cal month to pay the ccj before it gets registered.

in that time things could change.

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, tarm39 said:

It doesn’t seem likely they will though they might just say we didn’t do it on MCOL or it’s too late now. And I don’t want to lose £275 only to find I’m then liable for the other amount 

they cant just say that.

let it run a few weeks

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@dx100uk I think this is the thread you mean  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460526-cel-b2b-anpr-pcn-claimform-defended-but-court-errored-going-for-set-aside-greyfriars-car-park-priory-road-bedford-mk40-1by-claim-discontinued/

@tarm39 Your reasoning is of course logical.  But you don't have to decide this evening!  See if Premier will accept the set aside by consent.  See if your case is strong enough to be heard without a hearing which IIRC would cost £108.  There are still options.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any reply from Premier Park?

If you want to keep fighting this, it's important this weekend that you get evidence together that the court messed up - screenshots of MCOL not working, the e-mail address you wrote to showing on the court website, etc.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...