Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKPC/DCBL Vanishing? Windscreen PCN claimform - ignored everything - West Cumberland Hospital homeward Hensingham CA28 8JG


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 349 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

An elderly (92) relative has received a claim form filed by DCBL for a PCN issued in January 2018.

Neighbours managed to signup to MCOL and file the AOS on-time. I said I would deal with it when I get back from being posted to the Baltics, unfortunately I've been a bit delayed and only returned today.

Based on the issue date 24APR today is day 33 and as it falls on a weekend I think he has missed the deadline which was 4PM Friday to file a defence which might mean he needs to provide some other paperwork? 

I've searched his house and I cannot find the original PCN. It was probably stuck on the windscreen as they still do that at the Hospital because I've seen them myself when I've been up there. He's probably ignored it all and binned whatever came in the post.

Not being in the best of physical & mental health, he has no recollection of the event, he no longer drives. At the time of the event he was being treated for cancer. It might be that he loaned the car to a friend who has since passed away. 

I'd like to submit a brief defence today, (if that might still be OK)? I'll then send off the SAR to get a copy of the original PCN.  Otherwise, might we be going down the route of some kind of default then paying the fee to overturn that?

1. The Defendant(D) is indebted to the Claimant (C) for a Parking Charge(s) issued to vehicle XXXXX at West Cumberland Hospital homewood,hensingham,ca28 8]g

2. The PCN details are 26/01/2018,xxxxxxx

3.The PCN(s) was issued on private land owned or managed by C. The vehicle was parked In breach of the Terms on Cs signs (the Contract), thus incurring the PCN(s).

4. The driver agreed to pay within 28 days but did not. D is liable as the driver or keeper. Despite requests, the PCN(s) is outstanding.


The Contract entitles C to damages.


AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS
1. £130 being the total of the PCN(s) and damages.

2. Interest at a rate of 8% per annum pursuant to s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 from the date hereof at a daily rate of £0.01 until judgment or sooner payment.

3. Costs and court fees

 

Amount Claimed £186.49

Court Fee £35

Legal Rep £50

Total £271.49
I

three documents,

the claimform,

the LBA from March and

a reminder I've found dated 2021.

I've redacted the personal stuff.

 

DCBLClaim .pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is probably still rescuable.

Get back on MCOL and immediately post a defence.  Go to  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/393251-received-a-court-claim-from-a-private-parking-speculative-invoice-how-to-deal-with-it-hereupdated-dec-2021/  and scroll down to  Q2) How should I defend?  where you will find a generic defence.

Do all this now.

The law is that, if someone files a defence late, but the claimant hasn't yet entered judgement, the defence takes priority.  Maybe the Bank Holiday will have kept the charlatans out of the office and they may be late in their fleecing.  But do it now.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply.

I've submitted the generic one about an hour ago, hopefully that will give us some time. 

May I ask if you're able to open the PDF files? I've tried a few times to upload but for some reason the doc permissions change.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to UKPC/DCBL Vanishing? Windscreen PCN claimform - ignored everything - West Cumberland Hospital homeward Hensingham CA28 8JG

Yes, I can read the PDF fine.

Brilliant that you've submitted the defence.  That will certainly buy some time.  Basically you've done what everyone else does here ... albeit cutting it a bit fine 😄

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent. Thank you. 

I believe my next step is to go and submit a SAR to UKPC to get a copy of the photo evidence and the particular of the 2018 claim. I should anticipate DCBL applying for a hearing in the meantime. 

I would imagine the hospital car park is owned by the NHS Trust. Might it be fruitful to appeal to them to have the claim cancelled, or it's too late, now a Court claim has been issued? 

Was the law in January 2018 in such a way that we would have more legal basis to defend than if the PCN was stuck on his windscreen yesterday? 

Edited by Squaddy_2078
Link to post
Share on other sites

DCBL DOES NOT call the shots and are NOT the claimant!!

once you've filed that defence.

its upto the claimant IF they instruct DCBL to file DQ N180 in the 33 days they have.

even thought is was 2018 id be seeing if the hosp has a pals and write to them asking if they can intervene and get the PCN cancelled by the hospital admin as the RK is 92yrs old and was legitimately there in 2018 (hosp appointment?)

the pdf is ok

 

 

  • Like 2

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Understood. So the ball is in their court.

PALS? Some kind of policy document, process? 

I have more faith in the Judges than I do in an industry appeals process :D. 

He cannot remember why the car was there. I'll try to get a list of his historic appointments to verify. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Patient Advice and Liaison Service

 

 

WWW.NHS.UK

Patient advice and liaison services (PALS) - Official information from NHS about West Cumberland Hospital including contact, directions and service...

 

  • Like 2

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Squaddy is really on the ball.

What a breath of fresh air!

It's certainly worth a punt with PALS, but I wouldn't hold out much hope. The fleecers have issued proceedings now and got the bit between their teeth.

Sorry, shouldn't really compare the fleecers to our noble equine friends...

Edited by Nicky Boy
  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

So tomorrow ...

1.  Get on to PALS.  We have had a whole host of victories here in hospital parking cases by doing that.  However, as Nicky Boy says, contacting PALS should have been done when the incident happened, not once a court case has started.  It's almost certainly too late.  Still, nothing ventured ...

2.  Get a CPR request off to DCBL.  Get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.

3.  The CPR request should do the work of the SAR.  However, if you want, belt & braces, SAR UKPC, stick in some ID like a Council Tax bill otherwise they will find an excuse not to reply, usual free CoP.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defence looks to be registered OK, showed up on the Tuesday.

I've done the PALS and the CPR. 

Now the waiting game. 

Just curious, what would be the cost to DCBL for the hearing and contracting a local solicitor. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not your problem..its small claims..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They tend to use less experienced briefs for Small claims so they probably get about £200 to £300 for the case. However even if you lose they will only get around £200 so UKPC will never make a profit. But it encourages other motorists to pay up rather than go to court.

Knowing UKPC they will have cocked up somewhere along the line so your relative may get off scot free. Just a question of waiting for their paperwork which they would probably be safer to leave that task to the tea lady rather than DCBL . 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

No you are awaiting dq n180 being sent, might never happen, and only ever respond once mcol claim history says they've been sent out. ....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

A letter has been received from DCBL stating "no further action will be taken on this case at this time" referencing the MCOL claim reference. That's really all it says. The case is still live on MCOL, I presume they're just gonna let the deadline for applying for a hearing expire. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hearing? - have you not been reading the last few  posts here. nor selfhelping by reading like PCN claimform threads?

already answered this.

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wouldn't believe anything they say. unless it is accompanied by an N279 discontinuance court form.

the claim remain live to any action via an N244 set aside for SJ.

dont move in 6yrs without informing them/court.

scan it up if you can to PDF please

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They must be a real bunch of scumbags to say we won't take any further action to then change their minds and issue it again.

If they don't do anything on MCOL, what happens to the case? 

There's nothing on the letter I left out. All it says "Please note, no further action will be taken on this case at this time". Signed, Paralegal. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Please note, no further action will be taken on this case at this time"

Last 3 words give it away...

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...