Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about bb I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Friend with council FPN for littering a cigarette butt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 468 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A friend of mine has asked me how they could defend themselves from a fixed penalty notice as it going to court on Friday and they only got the summons on Monday.

 

they have been issued with a notice for littering by dropping a cigarette butt on the floor to put it out before putting it in the bin.

 

she has sent numerous emails to the company running the enforcement on behalf of the council

 

has been told the penalty has been issued correctly and will stand, and that there is no right of appeal and the only two options are to pay or go to court. 

 

there is a error in the notice in that the address of the offence is incorrect.

 

also they have claimed that there is video evidence and despite requests for the video it has not been forthcoming.

 

they say that the video will only be available once a summons has been issued.

 

she has tried the CAB and various solicitors the former saying that as it is a criminal matter the don't help and the latter saying insufficient time to prepare

.

any help would be appreciated 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends. Could attend court and make the case that the cigarette butt was dropped and quickly put in the bin. Therefore there was no littering and therefore no damage to the environment.

 

You don't need to drop a cigarette butt to put it out.  On the bins, there is commonly a part to put it out, before putting in the bin.

 

The accusation will be that your friend was caught littering and only when challenged did they put it in the bin.  Does the enforcement agent have CCTV or bodycam proof that your friend deliberately threw the butt onto the floor ?

 

Could they explain that they accidently dropped the butt and then picked it up to put in the bin ?

 

If you friend was caught in the act of throwing the butt on the floor deliberately, I would suggest paying the penalty and not going to court, as the costs will then increase the amount payable.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As above, the offence is dropping litter and leaving it. There has to be evidence that the litter was left, not merely that somebody believed it might be left.

 

What exactly has your friend been sent? Summonses are no longer used for most offences now. If it is "going to court" she should have been served with the evidence that  the prosecution will rely on to secure a conviction and that should include a statement from the officer explaining what was witnessed. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The evidence is witness statements and the email correspondence back and forth between her and the company working on behalf of the council.

 

She sent a summons through the post.

 

She has been told they have video evidence but no mention of this on the court documents as evidence 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without seeing the statements it is difficult to say whether they would secure a conviction. Any video evidence cannot be used in court unless it is served on your friend before she enters a plea. The hinge of this case will be, from what you have said, whether there is evidence to support the fact that your friend "left" the litter (and not that some jobsworth believed it might be left).

 

Is what she has received definitely a summons? You could try posting it up here (suitably redacted) but if the court hearing is tomorrow I doubt there's time to do that. At least if you could tell us what it says (exact words) it might help. What is your friend proposing to do? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read upload.

Pdf only please

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Friend with council FPN for littering a cigarette butt

You have left your friend's name and full adress visible in that PDF.  (You obviously didn't read all of it before uploading it... )   Also the name of the council's witness.  I suggest you correct it ASAP.

 

What is your friend's defence to the charge?

 

As @Man in the middle asked, what has your friend actually been sent telling them to be in court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

pdf hidden.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's still not clear what your friend has been sent. Cases like this do not usually start with a summons.

 

But no matter. If your friend really is appearing in the Magistrates' Court, there are two options:

 

1. Plead guilty and be sentenced.

 

2. Plead not guilty and have her case set down for trial at a later date.

 

To defend this she will have to cast doubt on the evidence in the officer's statement (which clearly states that the litter was discarded and left). This can be done by asking him to attend court and cross examining him. This is not an easy task. But if it is not done successfully a conviction will almost certainly follow. Your friend can give evidence that she did not drop the litter and leave it and it will be up to the court which version they believe (with your friend being given the benefit of any doubt the Magistrates may have).

 

This decision will have to be made before the court appearance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have sorted the pdf for you

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All 

 

Sorry it all went quite, thank you for al your help.

 

Turns out it was just to appear before the magistrates for Guilty/Not Guilty she plead not guilty so going to trial on June. i think she now has legal representation.

 

Again thanks for all the advice

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...