Jump to content


Parking Eye Montgomery Square Rotherham Information.


Recommended Posts

Just assisting an oppo with an invoice his son has managed to collect from PE at 74 Montgomery Square Rotherham.

 

Now having had a look on google maps at the site, things don't look good at all for PE, in fact the lack of signage in the whole of the car park, not least any signage at the entrance it's a wonder if they will chance their arm in court for fear of being laughed at by the DJ....

 

I have told him to ignore everything EXCEPT a claim form, although he isn't really willing to give them this option as he's very busy and would rather nip this in the bud now, without identifying the driver using ''the registered keeper'' on any correspondence he sends, he simply wants to use their appeals con, then when it automatically gets refused appeal to POPLA outlini9ng the lack of signage and offer of contract.

 

Any thoughts on this method of attack?

 

P.S. Spoke to the wife earlier who tells me I have another speculative invoice waiting for me at home when I get back.......can't wait!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You gave him the right advice.

 

It's understandable he wants to nip it in the bud, but as you know it doesn't work like that.

 

He could go down the POPLA route, but had better be very careful and had better be prepared to be disappointed.

 

Google Maps can be well out of date so get him to go back and take photos of the signage (or lack of), and get him to fill this in please

Happy invoice reading later 🤣

 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

OK, happy weekend everyone!!!!

 

My oppo has received this today.....told him not to be worried by it and to try and get some photos of the entrance and any signage he can find.

 

PE Rotherham A.pdf

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it's a Letter Before Claim, he needs to reply.

 

Snotty letter time.

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

it's a PAPLOC ..snotty letter time..

 

edit:snap dave!

  • Like 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aha, excellent, I may need a steer to the content of snotty letter, which thread has one on?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are hundreds here BB, but it's difficult to know what to send because we know nothing about what happened.

 

It would be much better if he took over this thread and

   - filled in the sticky  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/352949-have-you-received-a-speculative-invoice-from-a-private-parking-company-do-not-ignore-it/

   - uploaded the PCN

   - briefly told us what happened.

 

The fleecers are threatening court after 30 days ... tick tock.

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've sent him the link to this thread, hopefully he can log on, it's his son who's had this invoice and trying to find the exact car park they (Parking Lie) are referring to is like looking for a needle in a haystack but we think we have the one they mean.

 

 

To me it looks that it is prohibitive, so he was trespassing, I've got him going out today to get photos of this car park, so at least we can look at what they say.

pe stuff.pdf

  • Like 1

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

BB, Parking Eye have been very quick off the mark issuing Court procedures. There has been no attempt to use debt collectors or solicitors to issue final warnings. In fact to have reached the 28 th day to qualify them to have gained keeper liability by the 2nd June must have meant that they had the NTK  delivered within 7 -8 days. 

 

I have never seen PE or any other parking company initiate an LBC so early. I suspect that either your friend and PE have history or has contacted them to appeal or complain about the PCN and perhaps refused to pay.

 

In any event we do need to see the NTK with times and dates included as well as knowing if there has been correspondence or appeals made.

 

Of course it may be that they are trying to get as many cases in as possible before the new parking Act comes into force though they would start with the most recent is a mystery. 

 

But as FTMDave has already said the clock is ticking........................

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I appreciate that the photos of the signage are not great, however, the sign to the CP is simply stating ''Tariff payable by phone''.

 

Signs make reference to T&C's on signage in the car park, but I can't see any separate sign with T&C's on.

 

The other signs lay out the tariff payable.

 

Is the sign at the entrance supposed to inform drivers that it is a private car park and what tariffs are payable?

 

R Sign b.pdf R Sign c.pdf R Signa.pdf Tariff payable by phone..pdf

 

Apologies here is the PCN, this makes it as clear as mud!

PCN front.pdf PCN rear.pdf

Edited by Bazooka Boo

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bb use PDFmerge websites and put all those in one PDF else we'll be here all night downloading single pages

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Parking Eye send out a PCN 3 days after the alleged offence. It should be an NTK but they are calling it a Reminder?

So there is no keeper liability as no notice that the liability of the driver has been transferred to the keeper on that PCN .

Advise the keeper therefore not to admit if they were the driver.

 

If the father was the keeper then I would be inclined to advise PE that he was not the driver so cease writing to him as he is not going to tell them who was driving.

 

Any further attempt to demand money will be reported initially to the ICO followed by a summons for breaching his GDPR when informed that he was not the driver. {GDPR claims can be £750 and this may increase if PE do not desist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is something weird going on.

 

Maybe the "offence" was 26 April, the PCN 29 April, and this reminder letter 8 May?

 

The signs are certainly pants.  Looks like P&D but only payable by phone?

 

Not much we can do when the person in legal dispute won't come here but gets his dad to ask his dad's mate to do it for him (yes, two steps removed!)

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Timeline doesn't look right, but if only option to pay is by phone are other issues as if someone not have a smartphone maybe can't pay.

  • Thanks 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

 

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...