Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Nothing will happen in regard to this one shoplifting event, other than Sainsburys won't let you shop in this store again.   But, if you continued to shoplift, then the consequences are more serious. Local to me, there  is a town where about 13 people have been banned from shopping in many of the shops. They are subject to some form of order, where if they set foot in any of the stores, they will be subject to arrest by Police.  
    • Agree with DX, Sadly, from the pics, it looks like you're bang to rights😪 The rules are very explicit. Before entering the box, you must ensure that you are able to completely exit. It looks like the car in front may have moved a couple of feet and tempted you to set off, but when you did that, there still wasn't enough room to completely exit the box. By all means ask to see the video evidence, but saying you had to stop because the vehicle in front stopped, isn't a valid defence.
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I imagine the letter that the security guards talked about will be a letter from a company or lawyers who specialise in trying to extract money from shoplifters. I think Sainsbury's use DWF solicitors, otherwise it could be a company like RLP. It won't be a 'fine', only the police can do that. Look at this as a parallel 'justice' system that doesn't involve the plice. If you read around the forum for other cases of shoplifting, you'll get the idea of how this all works. If you think your behaviour has become compulsive, we suggest having a chat with your GP who should get you help for this. Best, HB
    • despite our wettest 18 months on record,  Low levels of rain and snow have cut Canada’s hydropower production, forcing it to increase electricity imports from the U.S.   - NYT
    • Hi all…. i was wondering if someone could help me. I am ashamed I have been caught shoplifting from Sainsbury’s by two undercover security guards who I suspect have been following me for a week now… I have been impulsively shoplifting due to what I think could have become an addiction of some kind. I am ashamed of what I had been doing and I do believe being caught has been for the greater good. i was taken to a room and asked to empty my bag, the guards were slightly rude but I complied with them politely as I know they are just doing their job and I am in the wrong. They retrieved my address, name, birthdate and took a photo of me, they asked me how many times I had shoplifted and I said twice and I didn’t want to be foolish and say just once. They issued me a letter of ban from the store and if I was caught in the store again the police would be called. They told me I would be paying 2x what I had stolen today as the goods had been damage which I am guessing is stole around £65 worth roughly. I did offer to pay for the items I had stolen on the day but they declined. They did not call the police but let me leave after claiming I was a lucky person. They told me to expect a letter in the post and that I “would be smart not to ignore it”  what should I be expecting in the post from them? I am aware from reading a lot online about security costs.. people mentioned to ignore these costs however as I had damaged the labelling on the goods should I still comply and pay the fines ?  kind regards awful shoplifter
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Clinically vulnerable and face to face Job Centre appointments, advice appreciated.


Jeff1969
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1105 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First time here and would appreciate some advice.

 

I'm a type 2 diabetic and therefore clinically vulnerable re covid.  I have been on Universal Credit since my job became too much of a risk covid wise a few months ago.  The DWP to be fair have been very supportive and recently have accepted that I apply for work from home jobs until I receive my second vaccination and all appointments have been by phone.

 

However today I received a text saying next weeks appointment has been cancelled and been replaced by a face to face appointment at the job centre.  I'm a bit baffled by this as I say above they have been pretty understanding re my circumstances until I get the second jab, which I am hoping for end of May, early June/just awaiting the text from my surgery.  I have messaged my work coach to ask if they can continue with telephone appointments until I am fully vaccinated but as yet have not received a reply.

 

Just wondering if I can do anything here or do I have to go in?  Also if I were to contract covid and become seriously ill whose responsibility would that be in this situation?  

 

Thank you.

 

 

Edited by Jeff1969
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Job Centres are now wanting some appointments on a face to face basis. 

 

See how the Job Centre Work Coach replies.  You can raise a complaint with DWP,  if they continue to insist on face to face and you feel it is unsafe.  But do send a journal message explaining reasons for non attendance and that you have raised a complaint.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-work-pensions/about/complaints-procedure

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply. 

 

I think that the difficulty I may have is that the government had us diabetics down as clinically vulnerable and not clinically extremely vulnerable despite a high number of those who have died being diabetic.  I'll see what the work coach says

 

but it is just very frustrating considering I am just trying to old out for that second vaccine (which shouldn't be too far off) before I actually go anywhere.  Especially with this Indian Variant by all accounts putting people who have had just one vaccination in hospital.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all. 

 

Remarkably have received a message this morning that says my work coach has changed it back to a phone appointment for me.  Surprising but pleasing.  Just very odd because they have been really good to be fair and allowed me to claim despite leaving my job voluntarily due to the covid risks.  I worked in a small school where masks weren't mandatory for pupils.. 

 

I've only been claiming since December and we have been pretty much in lockdown for that time and I have had two very good previous coaches who were very understanding especially as I have a little bit of furlough coming through from a second job so not claiming the full amount, and that I couldn't apply for my usual jobs until vaccinations.  My old school even wants me to apply again once things are safer.

 

 However my work coach changed yet again a few weeks ago and he seems to be a bit more "by the book" so  to speak.  I think he is fairly new to the job but he keeps asking for updates on my vaccine and pushing things where the others didn't. Has changed it anyway so that's a relief.

 
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

All JCP's have been ordered to get 'customers' in for F2F meetings now. however work coaches are very aware that one cap doesn't fit all and there are some who won't be able to attend the F2F meetings.

 

As you have already done, it's a simple case of contacting your work coach informing them that you won't attend F2F meetings due to the ongoing crisis and you will continue to engage with them via phone and email.

 

What they are doing, at least in the JCP I work in, is contacting their customers and inviting them in for a F2F if they fail to attend and fail to engage over the phone then they are closing down the case so that the ''customer'' then has to reapply for UC.

 

Of all the places I got employed, it was doing security in a JC working for the DWP, oh the irony!:spy:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all you have been very helpful.  I've heard that is easier to sanction "customers" at F2F meetings although I should maybe put an "allegedly" in there.  It is bizarre though. 

 

I was booked a phone meeting with the Careers Service re help with my CV a month ago.  It didn't need much help but thought I better just go with the flow if they suggested something.  Careers Service never called and despite a couple of journal messages from me pointing that out I never received any reply. 

 

Had two texts the day before, one from DWP and one from NCS "reminding" me but never got the call.  I remember thinking that if it had been me not taking the call I would have probably got sanctioned.  I've rebooked so will be interesting to see if they call this time!

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Bazooka Boo  "Of all the places I got employed, it was doing security in a JC working for the DWP, oh the irony!  "

 

This is hilarious !  😃

 

Next step is that you will apply for a job as a Work Coach. 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, unclebulgaria67 said:

@Bazooka Boo  "Of all the places I got employed, it was doing security in a JC working for the DWP, oh the irony!  "

 

This is hilarious !  😃

 

Next step is that you will apply for a job as a Work Coach. 

 

The irony of that is that I personally did apply!  Didn't even get through the online test.  Wasn't nasty enough apparently!!🤣

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no clinicaly vulnerable anymore or extremely clinically vulnerable, according to the government, as anybody in those catagories should have been vaccinated.

Staff feel the same as the OP, especially those with similar health conditions.

 

Staff should currently only be asking people who would benefit from a face to face appointment into the ofice, however the steer from on high, is to bring everybody back into the office. The current priority is 18 - 24 for kickstart.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the recent rise in covid cases in some areas of the UK, if a claimant with health conditions does not feel safe in travelling to a Job Centre, they should be sending journal messages to register their concerns about safety.

 

The health conditions should be reported on the benefit claims anyway, so claimants should ask the Job Centre to take this into account, together with travel arrangements. If the claimant need to use public transport and/or has a long journey they should mention this.   Also if the claimant needs to attend the Job Centre with anyone accompanying them, the Job Centres needs to be made aware of this, as there is a social distancing overall capacity limit on the number of people allowed into Job Centres.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

There has been a rumour around my way that there is some possibility of industrial action from workers at our local JCP due to the staff feeling unsafe.  Not sure if it is just a local rumour of national.  

Edited by Max1968
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have my second vaccine now scheduled for this Friday so within two or three weeks from the vaccine I should be fully covered, or as covered as you can be.  Will ask the nurse if it's two or three weeks it takes to kick in as I can't find a definitive answer online. 

 

I have however now got another problem that I could do with advice for.  I suffer with metatarsalgia which the consultant is now concerned has developed into morton's neuroma.  It's pain at the ball of the foot which can progress to the toes and despite many an exercise and prescribed insoles it's not getting any better. 

 

It looks like my only option may be an operation and recovery is anything between six and eight weeks.  Obviously it doesn't affect my ability to continue to look for work from home jobs, of which are unfortunately rare with my skill set, but it would mean anything to do with walking/driving will be out for a while.  Wondering if it is worth discussing this with my work coach and whether a temporary move to ESA is a possibility if the worst happens?  Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may be able to do a dual claim to ESA, if you meet the elgibility criteria. If not, just report a health condition on UC and they health journey/work capability process should start for you.

Exactly the same thing, but you just stay with UC.

Not much difference other then stamp paid.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they have changed it again!  Apparently decision was made last Friday that all appointments are now face to face and if you don't attend it's  a sanction.  Ridiculous that they are asking anyone, let alone those vulnerable to this virus to attend face to face appointments before they have had both vaccinations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you believe that the appointment represents an unnecessary risk to your health, then I would suggest that you register a complaint on your journal and to follow that up by completing the DWP complaints form online.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-work-pensions/about/complaints-procedure

 

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think so as I'm down in Sussex.  Not having been indoors anywhere though for months bar my own home and with my second vaccine coming up this Friday it seems a ridiculous risk to take after staying safe for months just for the sake of three weeks from Friday for the vaccine to give as much protection as it can.  I've just rang the UC Hotline to ask whose responsibility it is if I were to contract Covid and got seriously ill but they just said I had to speak to my work coach!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah well seemed to have sorted it without using the complaint facility.  I asked work coach if he could ask his Team Leader to apply a little common sense and said by the time the "next meeting" came around I would be fully vaccinated so why waste a year of me not going anywhere to possibly fall at the last hurdle.  Asked if the Team Leader would take responsibility if I were to contract it and fall ill and ten minutes later they have changed it back again to a phone appointment and all future ones will be face to face which is fine, although I'll obviously be wearing a mask AND visor!  Why don't these people have any common sense?!  Change from phone, to FTF, back to phone, back to FTF then back to phone again.  Totally unnecessary!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm I would say your are being lied too. Current guidance is based on a ladder approach of current priorities.

 

Top of the ladder is 18 - 24 and then filters down to 25+ caseloads.

 

Our jobcentre is inviting people for a face to face, but then changing it if we get a request for a phone appointment etc. Video calls are now a thing as well, but slow rollout and not too many work coaches want to do them.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting.  Must confess I wouldn't have known if it hadn't been a message from my work coach saying the decision to make them all FTF appointments were made last Friday after I messaged him about something else.  I then saw lower down on my journal that my phone appt had been cancelled but had received no text notification.  Then suddenly a message appeared saying I had a FTF appointment which had obviously been done in a hurry.  If I hadn't signed in to complete another part of the journal and messaged my work coach I wouldn't have known.  GP appointments are still by phone, Employment Agencies are still doing interviews via zoom, a lot of job interviews are still via zoom and yet JCP pulls everyone back in regardless of their situation?!  Can you imagine F2F appointments in say Bolton where the Indian variant is, it would be deemed a health and safety issue anywhere else!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember, it's not your work coach doing this, it comes from ministers and work coaches have to do as directed on a national level.

 

Most work coaches agree that telephone appointments are just as effective as face to face appointment, but the higher ups won't hear of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tomtom256 said:

Remember, it's not your work coach doing this, it comes from ministers and work coaches have to do as directed on a national level.

 

Most work coaches agree that telephone appointments are just as effective as face to face appointment, but the higher ups won't hear of it.

 

Oh indeed I certainly don't blame them they have a tough job.  That's why I asked him to have a word with the Team Leader.  I suspect the Work Coaches could do their jobs as well from home as well.  The Government doesn't help itself asking the public not to go mad and be sensible but they forget their own advice time and time again!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...