Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell and Cabot


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6224 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Pah!

We've been receiving letters from Cabot and Lowell about so-called debts to their companies - alleged debts that they have bought off another company - or something like that - for a while now. The letters progressively get nastier, and they send them almost daily, saying things like.... as you have not responded to our last letter... (which we only received yesterday and we work during their opening hours!!).

the point of me typing this is to say that we sent the letters off to both companies saying that we do not acknowledge any debt to them and we want copies of the agreements, statements etc etc , and one of them sent us such a polite letter back saying that they will look into it within 21 days to 8 weeks. I am surprised at the complete change in tone in the letters (although they really need to spell check and proof read them before they send them out!). However, i have noted the 8 week deadline in my diary and will take it from there if there is no response until then.

Just a note to encourage you to write to the companies, they really shouldn't be allowed to do the things they do - especially without any evidence available initially.

Good luck everyone. I will keep you posted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ignore the 8 weeks, it's drivel !

 

They have 12 (working) days to supply you with the information, after that they cannot take any action against you without the permission of the judge.

 

If they still haven't supplied the info after 30 days, they have comitted an offence. REPORT THEM :D

  • Haha 1

Nil Illigitimus Carborundum

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Has it been proven in law that they cannot chase you after the 12 + 30 day period ??? thanx"

 

This is the law. Its set down in the Consumer Credit Act 1974. The debt collectors have to abide by the law same as everyone else. Stick to the timetable. If they default report them to trading standards and if they continue to write and demand money from you report them to the Office of Fair Trading.

 

Write to them and tell them, do not phone a debt collector ever, that unles they have written proof you owe them money you will not pay. They may decide to take you to court but they would have to persuade a judge of their right to collect - paperwork.

 

To summarise - they are trying it on!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that they then have a right to persue the debt, but only with the permission of a judge, and no judge would look favourably on their initial failure to provide the information in the required timescale.

Nil Illigitimus Carborundum

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what do i do with the other company who haven't yet responded to the letter which I sent almost 2 weeks ago? Do i do the same with them and write to say that they've gone over the 12 days, or is that 12 days from them responding to my initial letter?

 

This Forum is a great help - i would've just waited for the 8 weeks otherwise. Thanks for all yur help, its much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, just let the clock tick.

Having served the CCA, and the initial 12 days have now passed the alleged debt is now only enforceable with a judges consent. And if they don’t supply the documents in a further month then they have committed an offence.

If in the future they produce the documents they would still have to get the courts permission to pursue it, and explain why they committed the offence in the first place and as I understand it they would incur a hefty fine.

 Also, as the 12 day period has elapsed they can’t take any action, harass or threaten you.

 However, having said that, from experience these companies they will keep harassing you. Keep all correspondence as proof, as it might be required at a later date, and report them to OFT. It might seem a waste of time, but if you highlight the fact they have a duty of care to the public then they seem to act.

 If you read other post about these and similar companies you will then get a feel for their tactics and get to understand your rights.

 You are now in the driving seat, it is for them to prove you owe the alleged debt before they can take you to court and not for you to prove you don’t.

 Keep us posted if you have any problems

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, who do i report them to- and how please?

Is there a letter template to use? I haven't looked yet - or do i draft one myself? I can include copies of the papers they have sent to me.

One evensays 'thank you for your recent payment' - i haven't paid them anything! I'm not really willing to call them about it though incase its a nasty ploy on their behalf - although i don't think they would've been smart enought to think of doing that!!

I will have a look now at other useful tips but feel free to throw pointers my way!!

Many thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may not believe this but their "thanks for the payment" is!

a ploy it's an attempt to imply that you have now recognised the debt.

If they try it on ask them how you made the alleged payment.

Make sure you keep any bank or credit card statements so you can prove they are attempting to mislead the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thanks for that advice. I don't really want to call them though. THe 12 days has expired now so I will report them.

I've had a look at the letters on the main page of Debt Collectors and Bailiffs and there doesn't seem to be a template relevant to my complaint to the OFT, so I wil draft one and include as much information as possible. Does anyone have one that they've already done for some pointers for me please?

 

I'm so excited about this, the Forum is great, I've just sent 4 claims to Court for my bank accounts and my partner has just told me that YES are sending him letters about a car from ages ago. Its great for the little person to have a voice - which is heard by many! Love it!! Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this any good?

To Whom It May Concern:

Re: Cabot Financial

I wish to complain about Cabot Financial and their methods of communication.

I have been receiving letters from Cabot Financial since April 2006, with reference to a debt which they state they have obtained from another company called Creation. I have no recollection of having a debt with Creation, and am unaware as to whom they are. The initial letter dated 19th April 2006 was for an outstanding balance of 711.42 and requested immediate payment. As I knew nothing about this company or so-called debt I chose not to respond to this letter.

Further letters continued to arrive, with increased debt amounts, increases which they have added to the ‘final amount owing’ from the Creation account: 10th May 2006 = 736.92, 8th September = 755.63 this letter offered a 40% reduction to make the outstanding balance 302.25, again I chose to ignore this letter and their threats as they did not have any evidence that the debt belonged to me. 16th November 2006 =766.54, with a threat of moving the debt to their ‘collections’ department. 24th November 2006 = 767.63, with a notice of “last opportunity to resolve this debt before we proceed with further collection proceedings”.

It was at this time that I was introduced to the Consumer Action Group website, where I have become a member and have been given advice on how to approach Cabot’s enquiries to resolve the debt. Therefore on the 21st November 2006 I wrote to Cabot Financial stating:

“I do not acknowledge any debt to your company. I require you to supply the following documentation before I will correspond further on this matter.

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit) - your obligation also extends in providing a statement of account. I enclose a 1.00 cheque in payment of the statutory fee.

2. A signed true copy of the deed of assignment of the above referenced agreement that you allege exists.

3. You are notified that you are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not under S189 of the CCA 1974.

Non-compliance with my request is a criminal offence under the above Act and will result in a report being submitted to the relevant statutory authorities.

As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the customer is totally unenforceable under the CCA and therefore is a complete defence to any court claim that is issued.

Take note at this stage, that any legal action you may contemplate will be both vigorously defended and contested.”

A response from Cabot Financial was received on the 28th November 2006, stating that they have contacted Providan National Bank regarding this enquiry, and that a response will be given within 21 days, although archiving can take up to 8 weeks. (I do not know who Providan are or why they have become involved).

A further letter was received from Cabot on the 29th November informing me that interest will continue to accrue onto this account until a payment plan is agreed.

I wish to contest Cabot Financials actions, as it is my understanding that Cabot have 12 working days to provide me with the information, under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. The 12 days has now elapsed, so I believe that a Judge must give permission from now on to enforce the debt.

It s also my understanding that complete details must be forwarded to me within an additional 30 days, not the 8 weeks as stated in their letter, which expires on the 3rd January 2007.

I am therefore writing to complain of the harassment and distress caused by Cabot Financial, with reference to an alleged outstanding debt which they cannot prove I owe. If they are about to pursue a ‘debt’ over an 8 month period they should have easy access to the accompanying paperwork and signed agreements, and should indeed provide these in the first instance of attempted debt collections.

I expect I shall be contacting you and then the Office of Fair Trading after the 3rd January to inform you of the outcome that Cabot Financial have no grounds to prove I owe this debt, and that the action they have taken against me has been unlawful.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it helps, Creation are a store card provider. I know they run (or at least ran) the Selfridges store card for them.

I would be inclined to hold fire on your letter until the 30 days are up. That's when Cabot will have committed a criminal offence and someone like Trading Standards ought to really start rattling their cage.

There is plenty of evidence that Cabot routinely fail to comply with CCA requests within the statutory timescale. I think every people should complain every time they fail to do so and mention that they theirs is apparently not an exceptional experience.

Oh and Providian are a doorstep lender, they're behind the Vanquis (40% interest credit card) and the wonderful and defunct Yes Car Credit. They're an enormous company with an interesting ethos.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone,

Thanks for your help there. I will take note, and wait until the 30 days are up and then report them, and will also add the information that you have added.

What bothers me now, is that i did have store cards a few years ago - so what if i DO owe this debt? Can they still chase it after the 30 days or does it get written off or anything?

Please help.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

after the 42 days and if i've not heard anything i will report them to OFT,

then IF they DO write to me, do i just write back to them and say that i know my rights and that they have breached the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and that they have to apply to a Court to pursue this further.

( and possible quote relevant jargon to them)? (even stating that the judge will query the delay in them delivering the correct papers, and also the chances that they will get a hefty fine).

Is this going to work?

Is it likely that they would go to a court if this was the case and then is it likely that the Judge would allow it?

I feel like i kind of know what I should be doing, but not sure if i'm going about it the right way.

Please help a little more.........

I'm not even sure there is a debt!

I know i had a credit card or a store card a few years back, maybe 3 or 4 years ago, but am sure it was all paid off.

It only had a £200 limit, so this is why i'm confused cos the 'debt' that Cabot are after is for £750 plus.

I've read about other charges on this forum, but i don't even know if its related.

I am hoping that they will either give up on me or come up with the agreement so it can be taken from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Skint sounds a daft question then why are you paying anything at all!

 

You can't remember the debt & they can't produce any paper work. It ain't enforcable so stop paying & demand your money back

 

PS if it turns out to be a Cap One card then the penalties can add up at an alarming rate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JonCris

 

I haven't paid anything! ( I won't!!).

 

I've been ignoring their letters since April 2005 (that's when I started to keep and file the letters anyway) and then in October I came across this site and then i wrote to them saying I don't acknowldge any debt - so really, i just want them to either leave me alone or prove it's my debt - which i really think they won't be able to do.

 

So i suppose i just want clarification that they've been chasing me for about a year for a debt they can't provide papers for, and when it's confirmed that they really can't prove there is a debt that they will stop writing to me about it.

 

Will it all be over in January???

 

Thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Providian are actually what is now known as Monument (taken over by Barclaycard I think?), and they're pretty run-of-the-mill.

The dodgy characters you're thinking of are Provident - behind the most rip-off credit card on the face of the earth and some alleged outrageous practices in the field of door-step lending (aka legalised loan-sharking).

They're a charming bunch!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...