Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft are chasing me for an unknown debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1338 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Checking my voicemail today I had a message from Moorcroft asking me to call them.

It's a name I haven't heard for several months.

 

Admittedly I was paying them something by direct debit several months back but I changed accounts and they fell through the net.

I've also moved house just under a year ago, so I would assume if they've written to me, I've not had their letters.

 

The thing is,

I don't know what this debt is for.

 

Several years ago I had various loans and credit cards which have all since been paid off.

I would imagine that if Moorcroft contacted me during that period, I'd have assumed they were something I've forgotten about and just set up the payment.

 

I do remember a company who I was paying by direct debit suddenly cancelling and switching to a different company who then accused me of cancelling the direct debit myself.

 

I've looked on my credit report on both Equifax and Experian and see nothing outstanding.

Certainly no missed payments.

I can account for everything on there.

 

I'm trying to save to buy a house and I'm really anxious about Moorcroft taking me to court and ending up with a CCJ.

Do I contact them and ask or is this some sort of scam?

Surely if I'd missed payments for months from somewhere, it would be on my credit report?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you were blindly paying any dca on a debt that was defaulted more than 6yrs , the debt will no longer show after the default reaches it's 6th birthday.

you should never blindly pay a DCA

they are NOT BAILIFFS

and have 

ZERO legal powers on ANY debt no matter what it's type.

 

as for moving , ideally one should not move without informing anyone that owns a debt of you correct and current address, if you might of used that credit or last paid it within say 7yrs and left a debt balance.

 

as for moorcroft, they don't buy debts, so can't get a CCJ or anything, only their client, the owner of the debt 'could' raise a court claim should they think you owe them money and that can quite legally be raised against the old address.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your credit file is clear and these clowns don't appear on it, then treat their voicemail as a wrong number.

 

As DX says there is sweet fanny Adams they can do, and their robo calls can be ignored.

 

Wait until they send a computer generated missive out, that's IF they can get an adult to operate the computer!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually strongly advocate the black hole technique whereby you never talk to them, email them, or answer their correspondence, just file everything neatly along with the envelopes it came in.   

 

However, if you don't know who the creditor is or if you even doubt you have a creditor it might be wise to write a very simple letter to Moorcroft advising them of your new address, something like the following:

 

I am writing to advise you that on DATE I moved from OLD ADDRESS to NEW ADDRESS and I request you update you records accordingly.

 

Yours sincerely

 

YOUR NAME

 

DO NOT sign it.

 

By doing this they will be able to write to you with their claim, which for the most part can be ignored.  However, if anybody out there is coming after you for a debt you need to receive the correspondence just in case the original claimant, spurious or not, goes for a County Court Claim.   If nothing else then a record of the above letter and the date of posting ought to give you grounds for turning over any future CCJ they get.

 

But in any case this is 99%  sure you will get any letters before action/claim packs etc.

 

Also, File EVERYTHING you get.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

moorcroft don't buy debts and cannot issue claims..................

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just write to them with your current address, after that they are safe to ignore.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they write then advise them that you did have debts some time ago and believed at the time that they were collecting on behalf of the creditor.

 

You now understand that was not the case as sums paid to them were not reflected in statements and that you now require an immediate full refund of all amounts paid to them in the past.

 

You will accept that this was a genuine mistake on their part only if they comply with this demand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they write just ignore them, unless it's a letter before action.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well unless the OP comes back and interacts with us which theyve not done for almost a week...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...