Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Strange Alleged insurance debt, RCIB, ICB and Canford Law


Astronomyphilly
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1532 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

I'm being chased and hounded day and night for an alleged debt of £316 which has jumped from £216 in a week.

 

I have a letter this morning from a Canford Law on behalf of Insurance Collection Bureau for Right Choice Insurance Brokers titled Notice of Intended Proceedings.

 

that they are instructed that I am indebted to Right Choice Insurance Brokers and that unless its paid in 14 days, its further proceedings without notice etc and, that unless satisfied they will instruct Enforcement officers to visit me and apply additional charges. Also, in bold, that they do not hold any copies or copy of the above mentioned company or their files. And that I should contact ICB immediately to arrange payment.

 

they have no agreement or signed documents but pay this money now?

Its like me saying to them pay me £316 because I say so!

that's where I am at, and the calls and texts and letters are beyond the joke.

 

This all started when I purchased a vehicle and I received calls for insurance quotes and whilst they shouldn't have passed on my details and I was pissed, the more quotes I got the better I thought.

 

Now I need to make this clear, at no point have I signed anything,

They did send quotes, various and they did send the associated schedule of the payments for me to print sign and return etc.

However I never did as the premium was ridiculous, no use at all. 

 

Then, over the course of a few weeks some £1100 was taken from my bank account.

I spoke with the bank who immideietly blocked my account and launched and investigation.

 

So far they've refunded a third and agree I hadn't authorised this.

I sent an email to right choice asking them what then hell was going on and to immidetaly cancel anything in my name, I had signed and agreed to nothing other than a quotation. 

 

They kept demanding payment for an account that Id yet to sign for and eventually a month and a half later sent an email stating my supposed account had been cancelled and to contact them regarding outstanding fees. usual standard stuff and simply ignore what I say or write, or the fact I've never signed for an account. 

 

Ad that brings us to todays letter from Canford Law.

I definitely need to take my own action to get this money back and find out what is going on but meanwhile, what's the best way to deal with this letter and these guys?

Its like they're saying pay us because we say so, they even admit not having any documentation that I owe anything, just somebody's word. Ludicrous.

 

I appreciate all help and advice on this, I really do. 

 

Phillip

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The pre-action protocol for debt collection is that they must give you 30 days and then you can reply and then there's a further 30 days.

So to begin with they are breaking that.

Secondly, on what basis has your bank only repaid you one third? Why haven't they paid you the whole lot?

I think you should send ICB an SAR – and tell Canford that you deny that there is any debt as alleged or at all.

Let's see what site team member @dx100uk can add

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the quick reply, wow.

 

The Bank is Monzo, not my main bank and they're not great at some things but they were on the ball here. Sent me a 20 plus pages letter on their investigation etc, very thorough. And they agreed to refund some of the charges amounting to around a third of what was taken. From what I recall they wanted more information back from my last correspondence with RCIB before they can do anything further, procedure they say. I'm still waiting on that and this apparent signed finance agreement.

 

The letter from Canford Law gives 14 from today, not 30.

 

Not too sure what the ICB and SAR are so if you guys want to elaborate when you have the time...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Follow the SAR link

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, you can tell Canford that a 14 day threat is in breach of the pre-action protocol in respect of debt and that if they decide to go ahead and issue proceedings on the basis that you will draw this to the attention of the judge.

Tell them that if they can't bother to act lawfully then they shouldn't bother to act at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice one, long day and this stresses me out no end.

Didn't even realise it was a link.

 

So get that off to RCIB or Canford? and as for the 30 days, a quick email or get a proper letter sent?

 

Curious what that achieves or how it can help? 

 

Really appreciate all this help, thank you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pap

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell Canford that in addition to ignoring the pre-action protocol, they have refused to provide any details of the alleged debt and this also will be brought to the attention of the court and they should realise that their unreasonable behaviour could result in the court exercising its discretion in respect of costs against them

Link to post
Share on other sites

who are canfords stated client on their letters?

 

looks like this is a pass the parcel, with no-one bar the original 'creditor' having any legal right to do anything.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, BankFodder said:

Tell Canford that in addition to ignoring the pre-action protocol, they have refused to provide any details of the alleged debt and this also will be brought to the attention of the court and they should realise that their unreasonable behaviour could result in the court exercising its discretion in respect of costs against them

Hi guys, have told Canford exactly that, politely and to the point.

 

19 hours ago, dx100uk said:

who are canfords stated client on their letters?

 

looks like this is a pass the parcel, with no-one bar the original 'creditor' having any legal right to do anything.

It is on behalf of ICB Insurance collection bureau working for Right Choice Insurance Brokers. Yeah, I know

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are ambulance chasers

they cant issue a claim on behalf IBC.

only who thinks they owe you money.

 

as long as they have your correct address ignore them.

 

until/unless they comply with the PAP and inc the response pack

or are stupid enough to issue a claimform.

 

looking at them around the net on like spoof ins fees threats...they are just letter bullies making a fast buck out of mugs.

 

dx

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/02/2020 at 21:01, Andyorch said:

Thanks guys, as always. 

 

This has me somewhat concerned? Thank you for this. I've ha d a read and not really sure what I should do with it, is this them? 

 

Nothing back from either yet after emailing them re sthe above. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd ignore them now

read my last post 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Monzo have returned just over a third at this point. 

 

As I per the original post they seem to have got my details via the car leasing firm, after leasing the vehicle I had a half dozen or so call me re insurance and warranties.

 

They gave quotes, all of which were above what I'd already got and no credit agreement or insurance contracts were ever signed by myself. 

 

Next I know £1100 is gone and I get this from Canford saying owe £316

Link to post
Share on other sites

time to put pressure on monjzo to chargeback the rest of the unlawful CPA's?? they allowed to be taken.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm doing all I can.

 

I've never authorised anything, no credit agreements, contracts or CPA's.

They agree that something isn't right, they failed at certain things and have refunded near £400 odd I think so far.

There's still around a grand missing in two or three transactions. 

 

In fact whilst they froze my account and I was on the phone, another amount disappeared.

Whislt my account was supposedly frozen.

They immediately admitted fault and rectified this though.

I've since transferred my money elsewhere to a big high Street Bank. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you apply for any Insurance online with RCIB or any company associated with them ?  Did you use a comparison site and then clicked through to the Insurers website to provide your Bank card details ?

 

If you search for RCIB, many people seem to have a problem with them.  

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO you might be doing everything you can...but others might have better ideas.

but monzo should be refunding everything not what they pick and chose if you did not give authority to whomever took this money to do so.....

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quoted from op's first post.

 

"This all started when I purchased a vehicle and I received calls for insurance quotes and whilst they shouldn't have passed on my details and I was pissed, the more quotes I got the better I thought.

 

Now I need to make this clear, at no point have I signed anything,"

 

You don't sign any paperwork, if you buy Insurance online.  It is an electronic signature.  It says something like, if you click on this box to proceed with the quote, you agree to the terms and conditions.  It asks you for your Bank details.

 

The only way RCIB got your Bank details, is either you provided them or you have been subject to  fraud, where someone else has used your Bank details to obtain Insurance.  Otherwise how would RCIB know your Bank details to process the debits ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Strange Alleged insurance debt, RCIB, ICB and Canford Law
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...