Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, hope you can help. I've received a £4k repair estimate from the main dealer after my 2016 F30 330e developed the dreaded drivetrain error. The qoute is for a replacement cell module and associated labour and various bits and bobs to get it done. I initially had them investigate the issue when it first popped up a year ago. They replaced the auxillary battery which 'fixed' the issue for a few months before returning. Last Novemner the issue escalated to 'Battery not charging' which would clear after powering off the car , and disappear. Took it into the dealer and they diagnoised a faulty high voltage battery under the boot but could not do any work as they needed to schedule more cars for this 'specialist high voltage work'. So they said I could continue to drive the car until they got in touch when the car could be booked in for repairs. Roll on to April, the issue became severe (battery not charging error not going away, car in limp mode one morning) and car completly died at a traffic light same day (dashboard flashing all over the place), couldnt engage in 'Drive' and had to be recovered by AA to the dealer. Turns out car was now only running on the 12v battery in the boot and that had run flat as the hybrid function had stopped working altogether. My question is whether this is a reasonable estimate. Could this be done cheaper elsewhere? The dealer has servived this car from new hence took it them in the hope they'd not point fingers at any other party. Should I be paying for this at all since I raised the issue with them before it escalted and resulted in a now expensive fault? I also suspect the KLE may have gone too based on other posts, but the dealer hasnt qouted for that yet. I worry they'll' 'discover' that after I've already shelled out for a new cell module and end up lumbered with another bill to replace the KLE. Feels like I know about what they need to do than they do. The Service Advisor has been completely useless. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
    • The Petrol Station is Shell Garage Wickham (Hampshire ) Another person obviously had the same issue as they had called the garage previously-
    • Thanks Dave, that all sounds clear to me. In terms of avoiding PCNs, I'm not sure if I can. I need to be able to park in that spot, especially as I've got kids to lug forth and back for the school run. Likewise it's not always possible to use the MA's permit system either, as I've not always got them to hand. So, if I'm actively avoiding PCNs, then it could mean I've given in to their idiotic rules. But, I do get what you're saying, as I imagine the risks go up if they claim there are multiple PCNs to be paid at court. Not sure what to do with this one.
    • Is it possible you could qualify for a DRO (Debt Relief Order) and ditch the IVA ? https://debtcamel.co.uk/end-iva-change-to-dro/  
    • My IVA which I began in 2021 has for around a year now been passed to credit expert - I find this company and it's staff obnoxious and insensitive money grabbing monsters.  What is my legal right can I have my IVA moved to another ip what happens if Hanover sell my file?  I am ina real bad situation where my kids are unwell and this crest expert supervisor is saying I should try more than what I agreed despite my situation being very bad and kids unwell.   I feel like they are bullying me and I duh I where to turn.  I keep getting emails saying we at credit expert are in charge of your iva now but still I got messages about my review annual from Hanover which I sent documents and now I got a response from credit expert saying they think I agreed to pay more - how ludicrous is that how can I keep these bullies at bay.   Who can I complain too without messing up my IVA.  I'm going to post below what they sent me please someone help me as they are making me suicidal now. These evil people g coincidently all Indians with weak English which is another issue as communication feels like a battle each time.    Good afternoon,   We hope you are keeping well.   In accordance with the terms of your voluntary arrangement you a required to comply with the following modification:   The debtor must seek to either obtain full time employment or improve self employed income to equivalent thereof as soon as possible and a full review of the debtor’s income and expenditure must be undertaken by the supervisor. The contributions shall increase after taking into account any increased costs in respect of travel and should commence in the month following the review. If any instances of co-habitation with the debtor by any person aged 18 or over occur during the term of this arrangement and where there is reasonable expectation that board and lodging should be paid, the contribution will be added into this arrangement in full. The debtor agrees to provide an income and expenditure review in the month following any loss of child related income. Any surplus identified is to be made available immediately for the benefit of unsecured creditors in the arrangement.    In order to ensure that the terms of the voluntary arrangement are adhered to, I require you to provide evidence that you complies with the above modification along with any supporting evidence.   Alternatively, if you believe you are no longer able to comply with the modification please do inform us.   I eagerly await your response to the points raised within 14 days of the date of this email.   If you have any further queries, please contact Customer Service on ‪0800 0431 431‬ or by email at [email protected].   Thank you for your comprehension.   Plese guys advice me what I can reply as I don't have any more money for these thieves and their annual review is an annual monster nightmare how can I tell them I'm not willing to be bullied and can't paid more    تھا ks   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ex employer requesting overpay of salary + holidays ***Claim Discontinued***


notodebt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1577 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

Just looking for some advice on proceeding forward with a CC claim from an ex employer.

 

Got claim form today and dated 27th Sep so have completed AOS today.

the POC is as follows :

 

The defendant was employed by the claimant as a ************  under a contract of employment commencing on July 2008 which is subject to English law .

The defendants employment with the claimant ended on Feb 2014.

 

The defendant received an over payment of salary from the claimant amounting to £396.55.

This over payment was due to the defendant exceeding his annual leave entitlement by 16 hours and the defendant was paid for 25 ? 28 Feb 2014 after having left his employment on 24 Feb 2018.

 

The claimant has called upon the defendant to make payment of the sum owed,

however the defendant has refused or delayed to make payment and accordingly this action has been rendered necessary.

 

the claimant claims int under section 69 of the county courts act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 1/4/2014 to 26/9/2019 on £396.55 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.09 

 

……………………….

 

Just to give a brief overview of what happened!

 

Jan 2014 I was under disciplinary action for gross misconduct which was never founded and dropped ,

after one interview with HR and my line manager I was sent home on suspended leave fully paid during investigation.

 

After debate/investigation between the comp and my union rep during Feb , my rep told me the company was dropping all action.

I then handed in my notice and told them to shove the job and left on the 24th Feb to which I was paid my last monthly payment and any owed holidays etc.

 

I have received about three letters during the course of the period 2014 to 2019 asking for the payment to which I have replied asking them to break down how i owe this amount.

 

My argument being that I was not on annual leave but suspended leave full pay.

The fault lies with their accounts dept in not calculating the correct pay or communicating the fact I was on suspended leave.

 

Communication and miscommunication was and probably still is a key factor with this company and one of the reasons I handed in my notice on top of the constant issues with my two colleagues which I raised every year during appraisals but nothing was every done about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you ever receive any correspondence stating that you were suspended on full pay? If so, you will need this to defend your case in court.

If you can't remember, or have mislaid any documents you can send a Subject Access Request (SAR) to your ex employer detailing all documents required. They have 30 days to respond, at no cost to yourself.

 

In the meantime, you will have to respond to the court documents appropriately, as to how you wish to defend the case, wholly or partially but you must respond. Otherwise your ex employer can win by default.

 

You could have a chat with ACAS and there are some free solicitors near University campuses who maybe willing to help and guide you on the employment law side of things.

If your near to an Employment Tribunal building, it might be worth popping in to them as they have posters up with contact details of qualififed people who may be able to assist. I know its not E.T matter but I'm thinking of free legal advice which specialises in Employment Law.

 

 

 

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shelly..Thanks for the advice.

SAR already typed up.

 

No documentation at all , it was all done verbally over the phone.

I need to see a copy of my contract as well to see if there was a clause about deductions.

 

A number of staff have now left the company including the union rep.

The company were recently in the news so poor are they but Gov backed so they can spend taxpayer money at will.

 

I suspect they may not be able to produce documentation ,

I was accused of taking equipment from the company despite the fact there was no asset register and equipment was handed out to employees with no audit trail,

 

I was one of three people responsible for the equipment and raised concerns many times about items going missing which of course fell on deaf ears. 

 

Oh I should mention the company head office is in Scotland ,

it is this dept that has initiated the CC ,

I was based in the English office at the time.

Not sure if this affects anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you start off by sending an SAR to your ex-employer and also one to the union.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems very unlikely that there aren't at the very least file notes relating to your suspension. Let's deal with that when you get the results of the SAR

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly dont know if the Scotland/England jurisdiction affects this, maybe Andyorch the legal expert on here may know.

Perhaps Bankfodder could point him in this direction?

 

You need to clarify the dates on the court paperwork and see when they need a response by, and think how you want to respond to it, otherwise your ex employers could win by default.

 

I would expect it to be a minimum standard to specify deductions being made via your payroll, usual example would be over-taken on holiday entitlement. But as you explain, you were suspended, not on annual leave.

 

If you still have your payslips/P45 information you could liaise with HMRC to clarify what income tax/national insurance contributions was paid in respect to your employment.

You can also calculate your holiday entitlement on the Gov website.

 

Start making a list of things you want to clarify, questions you need to ask/get answered to keep a methodical record of events for the court hearing, then when you have the Sar information come back if you need any further guidance.

 

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

English court is correct as the defendant doesn't reside in scotland

 

I would be sending them a CPR 31:14 

you have to ack the claim by day 19 

has this claimpack come from northants bulk or Salford court?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for the advice to date. It is Northants bulk county court. CRP 31.14 would be ideal especially as the POC states contract in the first paragraph.

 

In terms of questions or clarification certainly what the company has on record for Jan/Feb 2014 in terms of my suspension.

 

Before I handed in my notice I handed a list of issues that I had with the company to my union rep to be raised with HR and my team leader including issues with my two colleagues , security of assets, issues reported to senior managers that were never acted on.

 

After that list all allegations were dropped as I was prepared to escalate further to a tribunal.

 

The company did not want the bad publicity. I think I may have some of those docs on a USB drive

 

It was a shambles any issues were dealt with in a flippant manner , nothing in writing. get on and sort it out amongst yourselves was the attitude.

 

Missuse of company expenses etc was the norm so they wanted to avoid the press getting any negative stories.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.
[if mcol is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time]
.
 register as an individual
 note the long gateway number given
 then log in
.
 select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.
.
 then using the details required from the claimform
.
 defend all
 leave jurisdiction unticked
 you DO NOT file a defence at this time
 click thru to the end
 confirm and exit MCOL.
.

 get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant]
..

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/
.
.
type your name ONLY

no need to sign anything
.
you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.
you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count]
 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

When you send your SAR they have 30 Calendar days (from acknowledging receipt of your request). simply ask for 'ALL DATA' (this covers whatever formats they hold that Data)

 

They could play games due to the claim form and wait to send it at the very last minute so you get it just within the above limit.

 

If they do not comply with your SAR you report them to the Information Commissioner (ICO)

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

You take 30 from day it was signed for by the recipient. 

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

a letter back from company to acknowledge SAR.

Followed by , we authenticate the ex employee by using info provided as part of your request.

The details you provided are not suffice in allowing us to match the records the we currently hold for you, you have failed authentication. and request has been put on hold.

Can you provide the following:

1.Employee No

2. Nat Ins no

3.First line of address and post code

 

When authenticated we will progress your request.

Then goes on to say they have one month to respond as per legislation.If you are not satisfied complain to the ICO...etc

 

Now why do I need to provide these details as they already have them or should do! 

The POC clearly states as an employee so they  should have the details on record.

 

I can provide all details apart from the employee no , as this was five and half years back I do not have that to hand , certainly do not have any payslips etc.

 

I am tempted to write back to say you have not complied with my request in the first instance but do I need to provide these details by law?

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you moved too since having this job?

 

it cant harm you to provide what info you have to help them.

though ofcourse referencing the claim number should really be all that's needed..

 

but that is ofcourse what the cpr was for.

in a way the sar is belt and braces.

 

they must at some point, be it in reply to your 31:14 or latterly at the disclosure stage, produce all paperwork they intend to rely upon in their claim

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

have you moved too since having this job?

 

it cant harm you to provide what info you have to help them.

though ofcourse referencing the claim number should really be all that's needed..

 

but that is ofcourse what the cpr was for.

in a way the sar is belt and braces.

 

they must at some point, be it in reply to your 31:14 or latterly at the disclosure stage, produce all paperwork they intend to rely upon in their claim

Hi..yes left there in 2014 had several jobs since. I have no idea what the employee number is , so without this will fall at the first hurdle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

read what i said CAREFULLY

 

Moved home.??

You dont need employment no 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

neither

 

its immaterial ...you don't have it 

give everything else.

 

or read my post carefully

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you never use email nor give one.

 

else you'll find they'll file important docs 1 min before a deadline removing your chance to retort on them.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...