Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yes when you get your N180 from the court. on the sols copy omit phone/sog/email.
    • you dont need a copy of the letter. just proof. it might pay you to sar SLC as if they had your correct address on record before loan sales to erudio , that will add another very strong string to your bow toward setting aside this backdoor CCJ and the arrows you'll fire at Arrows (Erudio are arrows DCA in sheeps clothing)   you also might like many others find that you still have access to the online SLC portal. that could be useful with info. like deferral dates etc and address and what they knew and when.   at present you are in the info gathering stage, the more of that you can get the better.
    • IMHO i would never have a DD setup for any consumer credit debt. they are not a priority, like mortgage/rent/CTAX/Gas/Electric.   this gives you a bit more work to do, but it ensures there is always money for the priority things that can threaten the roof over your head or it's the necessary home utils needed with one.   it's also worthy to note that somethings that are unconscious priorities (though NOT!) like mobiles/phone/digital tv and broadband etc DD's often contribute to the real priorities not being paid. careful management of those needs to be exercised, like moving their payment dates to after the priorities are deal with in your calendar, or vice versa move the priorities to before those come out.   it is stunningly amazing how many families fall into priority bill debts by blindly pay these 'mentally essential luxury gadget' bills and are in total ignorance of the effect they have upon their available funds as 'they can't live without them'.
    • Just as UB says, he bailiff does not need to be invited in, but he certainly should have announced himself. i dont suppose he said what the enforcement was for?   The bailiff has to have a "reasonable belief" that the debtor resides at your address, if he is permitted to enter.   In the first post you say the Warrant was addressed to next door, is this your daughters property and did this Richard live at that address or your address.?   We should find out what the bailiff may say to try and justify his actions.    
    • Still valid?   For completion once a defence has been submitted and the claimant wishes to proceed.   Yes to mediation No if its statute barred or a parking claim. Yes to Small Claims Track State your local County Court  1 witness = yourself   The rest is self explanatory   Run 3 copies..Court/Solicitor/File
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

Euro Car Parks - debt Recovery Help please !


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 747 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Help!

 

im a student and my Uni is very close to a Morissons.

I've parked there randomly a few times and got 2 tickets for 50 pounds for overstaying the 2 hour period.

 

To be fair i wasn't looking for any parking signs as i was always in a rush and didn't even know that i had a time limit in a shopping center car park. To be fair is a very small town. I live in Northampton by the way.

 

I have receiving 3 letters( each for the 2 tickets) from Euro car parks which i kind of ignored and after that i have been getting tickets from DRP saying i have to pay 150 pounds each for both tickets.

 

What should i do ?

i've been so scared to get in contact with these people.

At first i didn;t have the money and after that i thought i would just wait and get more familiar with the subject.

 

Do i have to pay these tickets or not ?

How should i go about this?

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thank you for starting a new thread.

 

I don't think you'll be paying the tickets and debt collectors aren't anything to worry about, they can't do anything to you.

 

Please give us the information requested in the forum sticky and the guys will advise you.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?462118-Have-you-received-a-Parking-Ticket-(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore DR+ complately, they have nothing to do with anything and just get paid £15 to write a couple of scary letters. ask yourself why they want £150 whem the debt would be £100 max and then try looking up the law on parking demands and the rules around debt recovery. Once you realise they are breaking the law then you will reralise that they rely on ignorance and bluff to make themselves a few quid.

 

Now Morrisons have booted the parking cowboys out of most of their sites so you could ahve asked for a timely intervention by them but too late for that now.

 

Do you still ahve the original demands they sent you? Can you get some pictures of the signage at the car park so we can have a look at what they say and see if they acrually offer a contract and then see if the supposed breach matches one of the terms offered. You would be surprised how oftwen they get the basics wrong.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...