Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ae - thanks for your interest.  It's quite overwhelming to keep reiterating the background.  I've lived through a lot and put a lot behind me.  There is one property - that has unresolved civil litigation.  It's been subject to lots of litigation - as explained (LH/FH).  I also explained the lender could've sold it immediately.  They chose not to.  The crux of the remaining litigation is focused on the steps they took and why I shouldn't be liable for their failures.  My counterclaim raises issues of criminality.  I'm very tired.  Exhausted with looking backwards.  The trial proceedings are at their end - I am now only trying to figure if I have an alternative angle by way of a separate complaint or claim v receiver AND how I can force a sale before the issue would be dealt with at trial.  (Aside: i'm still considering if I can complain v broker and need to follow up with sra on former lawyer negligence) I'm considering Bazza's comment about fmv - 
    • What is the £3500 debt based on, estimated or actual readings? You may have all been paying an amount each month by direct debit but that may not have covered your usage so you still owe a debt.  If you are joint tenants for the property, all five of you have joint and several liability for any debt owed so you alone can be pursued for the full amount or they can pursue all of you for the full amount.  You need to find out whether or not British Gas has billed you correctly and the amount claimed is correct. 
    • The charging order is a red herring. If the IVA fails because payments are stopped, the IVA practitioner can bankrupt the sister. Depending on the amount of equity in the property, if it's quite high, that's a very likely outcome. Advising the sister to just stop making payments is absolutely terrible advice.
    • Bazza - fair market value is definitely contentious.  Your comment has made me realise I must consider it in detail over the last few years alongside the steps lender/ receiver took. I've made a start
    • could might oh what by a useless restriction k. people should never enter into IVA's in the 1st place 90% goes on their fees. and all the debts are consumer ones too...    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PRA and old payday express PDL - want to verify my identity after sb letter to them


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1983 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

BWlegal has sent a letter dated 14th August 2017 requesting a final payment from me.

 

I see that the debt they refer to is a closed account on my credit file and the last record on the credit file was from T/A Payday Express, (and recorded by them) showing as 'satisfied ' default assigned in January 2017.

 

I have not paid any monies toward the debt which had a default registered from 2013 until January 2017.

There have been no default notices recorded after January 2017.

 

I have letters from Payday Express and Prac dated April 2017 saying the debt was assigned in December 2016 to Prac who use BWlegal.

 

I hope the above is not too confusing, I do want to resolve the issue but is bwlegal entitled to be asking for payments from me?

 

Look forward to your responses

Link to post
Share on other sites

its what debt buyers do

try and fleece you

 

so PDE sold Prac the debt in jan 2017.

 

don't get what you mean by a satisfied default..

 

if a debt is sold by the original creditor

they will zero the balance and mark it in their books as satisfied

however the balance has been sold on to the debt buyer for 10p=£1

and they will chase you for the full amount owing

you're just lucky they haven't updated the credit files yet.

 

was this your only PDL?

was your credit file already shot at that period?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.

 

On my noddle account it shows closed accounts and there is a monthly record of 'D' in a red circle and under the circle it shows 'DF', (Default , when you hover online on the D) . In January the message under D is DA which I am assuming means 'debt assigned'

Link to post
Share on other sites

should be a defaulted date in the debt summary

ignore the calendar markers.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

another IRL claim me thinks?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you dx100

 

I have read the step by step guide.

 

I think I have to send a dsar to Payday express .

 

I can let bwlegal know this if they send a letter of claim.

 

I think my complaint to bwlegal /prac are the delays in letting me know who owns the debt .

That bwlegal/ prac have not recorded defaults on my credit file.

 

Could one of my arguments in a complaint be that I only pay the value that bwlegal /prac bought the debt for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

id be getting all the details first

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debt is owned by PRAC - Being administered by BW Legal

And i wish you all the best to resolve this - Trust me BW legal are not easy to deal with...

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

PDE are the OC - PRAC bought the debt BW Do their Dirty work on their behalf...

PDE are part of Instant Cash loans... But you would have known this already if you saw the example that i put in the guide ^__^

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

original creditor IS who lent you the money

PRAC are a debt buyer

BW Legal are brain dead solicitors for hire

actually they are quite useless in most of what they do.

and you don't deal with them anyway

 

 

9/10 it use of letterheads only in the printer

oh and they cant default you

only the original creditor can

other than marking your calendar which is meaningless anyway

 

 

deal with the debt owner or the OC for the IRL complaint

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

original creditor IS who lent you the money

PRAC are a debt buyer

BW Legal are brain dead solicitors for hire

actually they are quite useless in most of what they do.

and you don't deal with them anyway

 

 

Ohhhhhh BROTHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA TESTIFYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!

 

And that I Can - Im dealing with them at the moment on a fraud case that is still ongoing and oh boy - They truly are Turd Emoji for brains....

 

I wont wrap you up in all the little intricacies but lets say one of their complaints managers who i will name only as "S" is truly a piece of art...

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi hope you can help

I have just received a response to a sb letter I sent to PRA Group in Nov 2018. Should I be getting the following correspondence from them?

They have replied with a letter dated 10 days after my sb letter to them as follows:

My current address

Dear xxxxx

 

Reference : xxxx

I write with regards to your recent correspondence regarding the above referenced account.

Unfortunately we are unable to fulfil your request as we have not yet completed the required security checks in order to verify your identity The information we require is as

follows-

Full name

Date of birth

Previous address and postcode

You can contact us via letter or telephone our office on 0800 877 872 to complete the checks we are required to make, in line with the Data Protection Act 2018.

Upon confirmation of the above details , we will endeavour to respond to your request as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely

xxxxxx

Title of person who sent letter etc.'

The sb letter I sent to PRA group has been retuned together with the letter above in the same envelope.

PRA group called my mobile this morning but I ignored it and didn't answer because the number was unrecognisable at the time. I later googled it and found out that the number calling me was PRA group.

Look forward to your response and thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont fall for it. They dont need you to pass any security checks. They just have to check the account to confirm it.

 

Remember, you havent requested anything. You have informed them of the status of the account.

  • Confused 1

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the debt

Did you use their ref number?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

File the above and ignore them.....as stated above you haven't requested anything..... you have informed them of the status of the account.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Continue to ignore them in the same manner:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...