Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok, so just been to see my friend, she still has her head firmly in the sand and had a pile of unopened post, thankfully nothing serious apart from this case!    In answer to your question it says N24 General Directions Order at the bottom of the page, then on page 2 where the line says "As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) " this is N271 Notice of transfer of proceedings.  Within the stack of letters I found 2 from Kearns Solicitors,    02-12-2022 Document pack with covering letter stating under the s78 CCA please see enclosed  1) A copy of the executed Credit Agreement, 2)  A copy of the terms & conditions 3) A copy of the varied terms & conditions applicable at termination / assignment, and  4) A statement regarding the conduct of your account as requested by s78(1)(a) to (c)  (Would you like me to describe the documents attached?)   18-02-2023 Generic letter asking for her to contact them to discuss settlement or they will take to court for further legal action. 
    • well you made the cardinal sin by phoning these scammers at least once so their persistence could go on. however you are new so there you go. you never ever ever phone any of these likes of scammers on these fake schemes that seem plausible.  just like a DCA chasing any old debt .. they are NOT BAILIFFS and have  ZERO legal powers to actually do anything. dx  
    • Okay understood now just based on personal experience how long does this go on for 
    • civil recovery schemes run by the likes of RLP DWF etc etc are a scam. totally IGNORE EVERYTHING. no if's or but's dx  
    • I’m 17 years old and Received 2 letters from dwf with my name spelt wrong and they are asking for for £230.40. I rang dwf civil recovery the first time upon taking advice from citizens advice to explain to delay to deadline as I was in the process of receiving advice which wasn’t much help. When that deadline was done I then called again to delay the deadline as I’m struggling financially and it’s lot of money they are asking for and I tried to dispute the cost to which they said okay we will delay it another 7 days for you to dispute the cost but I asked them how do I dispute this to you or Sainsbury’s and they said “we can’t advise you on this matter” I’ve read a lot of threads saying to ignore them but I was unsure now as I’ve made contact and have tried to dispute the payment and pay it which might mean I have admitted. Would they just persist harder and take me to court eventually or file for a ccj.   I would like to ignore them still but I would like to send a strong email so they know I’m clued up and then ignore them. I also want to pay the reasonable amount and get this matter solved. any advice on the law or similar situations are helpful when I called them I asked for an itemised bill. £101 stolen goods  ( supposedly caught me because they watched me on cctv over the duration of the week) also why did they not stop me in the first day. £20.40 recovered goods £150 security costs     Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dubai Debt through UK Courts - now Bank/IRDWW SD served


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 891 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys.

I have twice complained to the SRA and they have come back to me saying they are looking into it.

I even go my local MP involved and they emailed the SRA also.

I have also contacted the Daily Mail to see if they are interested in the story.

 

I will let you know the blog once it is up so we can all chat there and share stories.

Every time i ask the question to them about the jurisdiction they cannot answer.

 

 

Here is what i got back from My Coyle himself so you can see

 

- I am not the best person to express any views on the way the banks treat you and I can say that the sentiments you have expressed are not uncommon! ( so why are they representing these stupid banks then ) !!!

 

From a UK perspective, I can assure you that:

 

1. We are fully regulated in all our activities (including debt collection) by the Solicitors Regulation Authority;

 

2. In relation to our debt collection services we are exempt from direct regulation from the Financial Conduct Authority

– it’s a bit of a minefield,

but if you can access the FCA’s Perimeter Guidance Manual online,

you will find the solicitor’s exemption at 5 (b) of PERG 2.8.7C;

 

3. Tracing Services are no longer regulated by the FCA at all (under the previous Office of Fair Trading regime, debt collection companies, but not solicitors, were regulated) but our services are carried out in line with the Code of Practice issued by the Credit Services Association which itself ensures compliance with our statutory obligations under the Data Protection Act;

 

We are handling thousands of accounts here (RAK Bank is one of 10 banks we act for in the middle east) and, regrettably but inevitably, the service which bank customers receive is not as pristine as you might expect if you were buying a new car, or anything else more pleasant for that matter.

 

My job is to ensure that our banking team work ethically, compliantly and efficiently for the benefit of our banking clients. Sometimes, I’m afraid, the volume of traffic being handled by our team does not allow for every single question posed by a bank customer to be answered. That appears to be the case here but I’m more than happy to answer any additional queries you have over the telephone if you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CWD have to be very careful how they issue any court claims, if they have agreed any contract to share debt collection proceeds with a bank.

 

 

If you look into what happened with ACS Law who had a 50/50 deal with copyright holders, it led to a very unhappy ending.

 

 

There are rules regarding Solicitors who benefit from any claims they bring and they have to advise the court plus defendants of this.

 

 

To issue a claim in the name of a client bank only is not being totally transparent with all parties involved.

There are also rules that SRA apply where Solicitors sign such agreements with clients.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hello everyone it’s beem a while. Any updates. I have seen now IDRWW operated by Mr Coyle of CWD are active and have already contacted me with the usual BS

I’ve contacted again the FCA and also local MP as I feel 2019 should be raise awareness if these companies not following the rules

Link to post
Share on other sites

might be best to stick to your own thread instead of running around every UAE thread panicking about nothing.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if everyone stuck to their own thread

99% of these threads would be 2 posts long. = no ignore!

 

if you look at nearly ALL UAE threads

its the world and his oyster going around saying hows it going on every threads they can find relating to their issue.

 

you posts are all here now on your own thread.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if I don't contribute to the thread, but out of curiosity, why and how anyone would run into hundred of thousand of debt in a country where having bad debts is worse than murder?

After falling behind the first thousand, wouldn't a reasonable person try to clear the debt rather than pile up hundreds more?

Or is it a common misconception that running abroad after a few years in luxury would clear the debt?

My friend left UAE in a rush, even left his 80k car in the airport car park because chased for his debts.

He keeps moving from place to place and country to country in Europe, laughing at the UAE banks and thinking that they'll forget about him.

Instead they seem to have eyes everywhere and find him within weeks of moving every time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and theres stuff all they can do.

 

many just like your friend had to get out...and quick..we know why most of the time:madgrin:

just don't be journalist..

 

UAE then inflate the debt with unbelievable int rates..most of which suddenly disappear when fronted.

 

nuff said..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very true, but the constant bother of receiving calls, emails, letters etc is a real pain.

Without considering that at any point our bright politicians could struck a deal with them to make the debts enforceable.

You never know.

Personally I would never even dream to visit such countries even if they offered me a free holiday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no 'deal' with UAE..

 

what he is suffering is what they do to everyone...and if there was 'a deal' then it would come under our laws..but there isn't and that is why they get away with all these threats and blatant harassment.

 

no one can stop it..but no-one should ever eact to it...ignore..document carefully.. then use it when the time comes..and it will..

there are more political things behind my simple comment of just don't be journalist..than meets the eye..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Dealt with CWD a few years back and after advice from dx100uk I’ve never heard from them again.

 

9 years of abuse from Dubai collections agencies I’ve managed to deal with them also. Now IDRWW tried there luck but  have told them unless they purchase the debt and it’s taken to court please don’t contact me.

Debt is at 500,000aed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont forget to update your thread too then..:madgrin:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Not as embarrassing as being sat in work and having a fax come though to your director saying they are searching for me as I owe money !

 

Then my partner at work which is how she found out.

 

That said 9 years I have battled them all and will continue.

 

As for CWD and IDRWW there will come a time and I am happy to stand up them all with a group of all of us. 

 

I’m still trying with local MPs and FO

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am going to raise this again with the FO tomorrow and my local MP.

This is not on at all and no way fair.

 

I am also going to message all my contacts at step change and other debt charities to let them know this. 

 

Regardless of situation it cannot be right that they allow a debt to be collected here that has not even been passed in the courts in the UAE firstly and then using ruthless agents who go against all collection laws possible.

Double standards ! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Just to update everyone. 

I have contacted the BBC watchdog (I have a contact there)

also sent letter to SRA and the FO and ccd in all step change etc. I feel they all need to know this story in a sense that Cwd and IDRWW are not acting fairly in someways. 

 

I also received this message from an advice person high up Quoting

 

Thank you for your email.

 

“A non-UK creditor can contact you in the UK, either directly or by using UK-based agents to collect the debt. They also may be able to take action using the UK courts. To do this they would usually need to get a court judgement (the equivalent of the CCJ/decree) in UAE first, then start a second claim in the UK and get a judgement before they can enforce the debt.

 

If a debt originates outside of the UK it is not likely to be covered by UK regulators or ombudsmen, so if there are any legal disputes you will need specialist help. We would suggest getting independent legal advice from Citizens Advice Bureau or the Law Centre.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

who?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that explainsit ..since when have they ever done anything but make debtors blindly pay debts thru them anyway..

they don't even check debts enforceability when they sign people up to their plans..

 

dx

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve fired an email this morning again and copied in the SRA, Step change, FO And the FCA.

I will continue to send this until I am heard.

 

I will not have Mr Coyle and his partners (ones who called me at my work and were working as debt collectors under the CWD name) get away with acting unlawfully knowing full well people here do not know the full story of debt in Dubai. 

 

The SRA especially need to do some research into this and instruct somehow those judges who sit in small claims courts to understand there is a lot more to this story and believe me there is plenty. 

 

It cannot go unnoticed any longer and not allow CWD to win these cases without anyone knowing the full story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SRA wont do anything. The solicitor is just being a good boy and being told to do as ordered.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

My last correspondence with IDRWW was in January of this year and after my last letter saying to them telling them to show me what you can do or indeed get Mr Coyle from CWD to get in touch then I will reply I have heard nothing again.

 

I want for the next round from them or the others from Dubai its a fun game (also all other debt collection agencies in Dubai which seemed to have backed off a little )

 

I am the same 11 years ago from Dubai now and 6 years ago someone from CWD (when they were getting excited and starting out) had the cheek to call me at work to which I took them to the cleaners !! for breaking every rule possible.

 

It was only when i seen an email then from IDRWW using there offices that I knew what he was trying to do 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I’m fighting IDRWW and CWD and I’m looking into taking CWD to court also for their 9 years of unprofessional abuse on the back of DCA in Dubai also.

 

Latest update is I received an email from IDRWW one Mr Letheren who was also with CWD who contacted me in 2014 so I’m guessing he’s moved over to IDRWW.

 

The email contained a document that you cannot open and have to request a pin !! 

 

Ive repeatedly told them I will not entertain anything until this debt has been bought with all 4 banks and they issue court summons then I shall file my defence with 9 years of evidence from the abuse received. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I think it maybe only a matte of time for me also although different circumstances 

 

on another note after 3 years the FO have finally acknowledged my complaint and the daily mail and the FO have written to Mr Coyle and indeed IDR.

 

It seems that now they are using solicitors as debt collectors without titles and without signing off emails very shady and very dodgy ! 

 

I will certainly update you once I get my feedback 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...