Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ADCB/Moriartylaw final demand UAE debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 325 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recieved a final demand from Moriartylaw reference a debt with ADCB . I sent them the following email, and received the reply.

 

I refer to your letter dated 30/03/2023 regarding this debt. Received 08/04/2023

 

I believe that I do not owe the money that you are claiming. You will be aware that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Consumer Credit sourcebook says:

 

A firm should neither ignore nor disregard a customer’s claim that his debt has been settled and/or is disputed and must stop making demands for payment without providing the customer clear justification and/or evidence as to why the claim is not valid. (7.5.3)

 

A firm must suspend or cease the steps it or its agent takes in the recovery of a customer’s debt where the customer disputes or has settled the debt on valid grounds or what may be considered valid grounds. (7.14.1)

 

If a customer disputes the debt on valid grounds or on what may be considered valid grounds, the firm must re-examine the dispute and provide details of the customer’s debt to the customer in a reasonably timely manner. (7.14.3)

 

If there is a dispute regarding the identity of the borrower or the amount of the debt, it is for the firm (not the customer) to establish that the customer is indeed the correct person/identity in relation to the debt owed or that the amount is correct under the agreement. (7.14.4)

 

A collection firm must provide the customer with information regarding the outcome of its investigations about a debt that the customer disputed or has settled on valid grounds. (7.14.5)

 

If the customer disputes the debt and the firm who seeks to recover the debt is neither the lender nor the owner, the firm is required to:

 

(1) Pass the information given by the customer to the actual lender or the owner; or

 

(2) If the firm was given authority by the lender or the owner to investigate the dispute, the firm is required to notify the lender or owner regarding the outcome of the investigation. (7.14.6)

 

Please either provide evidence that I am liable for this debt or confirm that you will not contact me further regarding the debt.

 

If you continue chasing me without providing evidence that I am liable for this debt this is deceptive and unfair. It also amounts to what is essentially physical and/or psychological harassment.

 

If you do not either provide evidence that I am liable for the debt or confirm that you will not be contacting me further, I will complain to Trading Standards and the FCA.

 

I await your reply.

 

Note: I do not reside at ****. Nor did I receive any correspondence dated 21/08/2019 as indicated.

 

All correspondence, if any, will be via this email address and no other types of correspondence will be entertained.

 

Yours faithfully

 

****

 

Their reply.

In order for us to discuss this matter via email, we require that you first pass an identification check by providing the following pieces of information:

  1. Full name
  2. Date of birth
  3. First line of your address and post code
  4. Confirm telephone number (optional)

Please further note that by responding with such information, you are giving your consent for us to communicate with you via this email address and for the information discussed via email to be detailed on your case notes and shared with our client(s) where appropriate.

If you do not feel you are able to communicate with us via email, or would rather communicate via telephone conversation, please phone 020 3126 4544 between our openings hours of 9:00 – 17:30, Monday to Thursday, 9:00 to 17:00 on Fridays, or 09:00 – 13:00 Saturdays.

Our website is available for the majority of our customers. You can sign up or login at www.moriartylaw.co.uk where you can make payments, set up arrangement, update contact details, chat to us via webchat and view your case via the customer dashboard at any time. The response time for webchat will be quicker than an e-mail.

Kind Regards

Moriarty Law "

 

My question is,

where do I go from here .

 

Im happy to give my name but no other information.

 

With my original email sent, I gave them their reference number which I feel is sufficient.

Should I attach their correspondence as proof.

 

Note I no longer live at the address letter was sent to.

Seemingly they had written to me in 2019, a letter I did not receive .

I have not lived in the UAE since 2016.... returned due to bereavement.

 

Their response appears to be at first glance to obtain more information !

 

Thx for any assistance. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to ADCB/Moriartylaw final demand UAE debt

god where ever did you get the idea to send that utter twaddle?

 

all you should have done was written to the BANK giving your correct and current address - never run from debt - Statute Barring on these UAE debts is 15yrs!

 

else they are quite entitled to raise a backdoor CCJ against a previous one that you'll know nothing about until you get bailiffs at your door.

 

ive move you to the overseas forum

100's of like threads to read here about how to CORRECTLY deal with these debts.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

yep thats the way they play it then offer help for money to put it right.

 

yes you can be proactive, in as much as offer the bank directly an F&F offer or monthly payments if you like.

 

now i'm not sure if it's one of these debts whereby you originally wrote out cheques thats they've used and subsequently bounced  and they've added their fake £10000's of extra interest, that can be easily negotiated away during your offer process .

 

dont deal with anyone bar the bank unless you ever get

a letter of claim

a court claim

or

a statutory demand.

 

you'll learn about those by reading UAE threads here.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thx Dx. Bit of history. Debt is Credit Card debt run up by my ex wife, account was in my name (Stupid me). 

 

Bottom line, I'm 68, retired, on a crap pension and guardian of two children both under 15, rented accomadation, no assets to speak of. Therefore I am in no position to offer them any repayment plan, even though the bank have indicated they will drop all interest charges. 

 

Not being flippant I could offer 10 pounds per month but then we are looking at 200 plus years to pay it off. I would not except that offer. Could try I guess?

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't get blood out of a stone 

 

Stop worrying..

 

As long as you write informing the bank of your true address. That's all you need to ensure.

 

You don't have to negotiate.

 

Did they cash guarantee cheque and add 1000%+ fake interest.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A debtor's instinct to run and hide, is a strong one, but it's the wrong one. That's how the likes of Moriarty et al make so much money from gaining uncontested backdoor CCJ's to previous addresses. Don't be fooled by the fact they are writing to you where you currently live, these are just speculative phishing letters, any actual Claimform will go to an old address.

 

However once you write to them just stating where you currently live, the chances of any action go down to virtually zero. That's because they can no longer legally send an easy to gain uncontested CCJ to your old address. Also they will now know that there is every chance you would actually defend and win against their flimsy case, and that will cost them time and money, The 99% of other people hiding from their debt's are an easy win for them.

 

Please don't do anything silly like offer them any money, that will only make it worse. This whole thing can be stopped in it's tracks for the price of a first class stamp.

 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

I have revieved the following from our friends MoriarityLaw (See 1st page) .

They now have my correct address so no backdoor stuff. 

RE:

Our Client: Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank (PJSC) (“ADCB”) – Credit Card Number xxxxzxxxx

Dated 22/06/2011

We have been instructed on behalf of ADCB to recover from you the sum of 45,461.14 United Arab Emirates Dirham (“Debt”) being the sum owed by you to ADCB and which equates to a sum of £10,159.43

and arriving at the sum of £10,159.43 we have applied a currency conversion rate of 1 United Arab Emirates Dirham (“AED”) equals 0.223475 Pounds Sterling and we have applied that rate from XE.Com as at our date of appointment 30/07/2019

and the reason we have applied that exchange rate is that you applied for and were granted a credit card with a limit of 30,000.00 AED (“Credit Card”).

Please note that we are writing to you by way of Letter of Claim pursuant to the provisions of The Pre-Action Protocol For Debt Claims (“PAP”).

Without prejudice to ADCB’s right to issue a court claim against you, in accordance with the terms and conditions applicable to your Credit Card Agreement, ADCB wishes to resolve this matter amicably.

BACKGROUND In or about June 2011 you applied for the Credit Card and agreed to pay interest on the outstanding balance of the Credit Card and were granted the Credit Card which was issued to you on 22/06/2011.

You also agreed to repay the outstanding balance by monthly repayments however, on 05/08/2017 you defaulted on the terms of the Credit Card by failing to pay the outstanding balance.

Despite the opportunities that have been afforded to you between 05/08/2017 and the date hereof you have made no attempt to come to an arrangement with ADCB to repay the Debt or provide them with a Financial Statement of your Assets, Liabilities and Income and nor indeed have you made any payments to be set off as against the sum owed.

ADCB trusts that you will recognise that the above facts and matters have left them with no alternative other than to instruct this firm to recover the sum owed.

NEXT STEPS

For the avoidance of doubt we must state that pursuant to the Overriding Objective and the “PAP” ADCB accepts that it is right to give you an opportunity to come to terms of settlement for repayment of the Credit Card prior to serving a Statutory Demand or issuing legal proceedings against you.

In order to save costs, and with the ADR obligation in mind, and in the interests of seeking to resolve this matter as expeditiously and cost effectively as possible, we request that you set out in full your response to this letter and that should include all relevant evidence, on which you rely and in that regard ADCB require that you let us have such response within the course of the next 30 days and such response should also include a current Financial Statement of your Assets Liabilities and Incomes.

Enclosed is a Financial Information Form, Information Sheet and Reply Form and once completed you should send it to the above address or alternatively we are content to receive the same by email at admin@moriartylaw.co.uk.

ADCB now hope that you will conclude a settlement of the Debt and in that regard should you not do so nor indeed respond to this letter within the next 30 days then please be aware that we have instructions from ADCB to commence action to recover the Debt. Please be assured that we are extremely conscious of the impact that the current economic climate is having on a number of people and if you are affected by this, please ensure you communicate that to us.

Shall I reply or leave it alone.

I have not admitted to the debt in either writing or verbally. And as previously indicated I have no assets or substantial income.

Awaiting your advice.

Ps I can attempt to attach complete file if required.

 

Edited by dx100uk
spacing, punctuation and sentencing added....DX
Link to post
Share on other sites

thats for the solid block of wall to wall text.......!! no spacing no paragraphs no punctuation...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

click letter of claim

follow post 5

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...