Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to cover yourself, you should write them a letter in response telling them that you are rejecting their offer. That they know full well that their insurance is an attempt to limit or exclude liability contrary to section 57 Consumer rights act and is a secondary contract contrary to section 72.  By the way was the offer made without prejudice or in confidence or anything? Maybe you could post up their offer here please
    • "Dear HR, I refer to my correspondence of *date* in which I challenged xxx, copy attached. Clearly this was a grievance, and yet does not seem to have been heard under the grievance procedure. I am exceptionally dismayed that this 'review'. which never took place, seems to be being used as a criteria in redundancy selection proceedings. As this is time critical, please advise asap."            
    • Just to update, received a revised offer of £75 from P2G after they got my LOC last Friday. They stated that because it was not insured this would be their final offer. Looks like we are going to court.
    • and speaking of cover-ups .. from the environment agency with collusion/negligence  from the ICO   Environment Agency chief admits regulator buries freedom of information requests Speaking at the UK River Summit, Philip Duffy said officials do not want to reveal the true ‘embarrassing’ environmental picture ICO - waffle Environment Agency chief admits regulator buries freedom of information requests | Environment Agency | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Speaking at the UK River Summit, Philip Duffy said officials do not want to reveal the true ‘embarrassing’ environmental picture   Environment Agency ‘hiding’ report into Lancashire landfill making locals ill Exclusive The agency has refused to share details of how a landfill operator is breaching its permit because it could 'potentially cause unnecessary concern'    Environment Agency ‘hiding’ report into Lancashire landfill making locals ill INEWS.CO.UK The agency has refused to share details of how a landfill operator is breaching its permit because it could 'potentially cause unnecessary...  
    • As Dan Neidle pointed out on Twitter/X, pensioners used to have a higher personal allowance before they paid tax, but this government removed it a few years ago.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot Letter Of Claim - old HSBC OD - all fees


iamgnome

Recommended Posts

you cant do both no.

 

pers i'd simply send a new one now you have the correct address.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

finally, they got back to me.

The letter is responding to my email.

They say they'll provide everything but I need to give them a written signature.

Does this sound ok?

I know CAG are a bit wary of signing anything for these banks...

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you havent read all the posts in the sar link?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you click sar and read the posts there.

We dont mind helping with templates but expect users to actually read the instructions that go with it......

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

😁

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

dx, all - sent on the signed request for SAR, nothing from HSBC yet... However Cabot have written to say they've now passed the account over to BPO Collections because we've "been unable to reach an agreement".

 

Guess the SAR got them spooked? Either way, seems like it was a hot load of nothing if they're that willing to pass it off! What do you think???

Link to post
Share on other sites

how would cabot ever know you had sent an sar to HSBC? 

BPO collections are simply another trading name of cabot...ignore...

 

if hsbc have exceeded their 30days you need to be chasing them, .

you can also enforce in a court their compliance.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't they share info with each other? I always figured Cabot was under HSBC's control but do the things HSBC can't publicly be held liable for.

 

Either way, have sent a chaser and ignored BPO. They are way over their 30 days at this stage. I'll take it to the ICO if they don't respond after this.

 

Thanks again Dx. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cabot are zilch to do with any bank

no dca's can be linked to a banking org 

banned years ago

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all - finally got the SAR.

Looks like the statements from HSBC match up with Cabot's.

There also seems to be credit card debt but it's not clear whether that was sold to them or not but the OD definitely was. 

What do you recommend going forwards?

Also to add - there is no default notice letter but a few letters that refer to a default notice letter!

What does that mean?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok time for a bit of work your way sadly.

 

 

 

pop their OD int rate in cell d15 of out CI sheet

 

enter every penalty charge individually on its date

try and find the last date HSBC charged interest

enter that as the claimto date 

 

then take that whole total from the CISHEET

pop it into a copy of the statint sheet as a whole sum 

the day after their int stopped

leave the claimto date alone!!

 

that gives your total reclaim figure

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

we get that done and keep it in reserve as proof the debt is all unlawful fees.

 

should cabot ever issue a letter of claim.

then we'll bring it into play.

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds good dx though the debt isn't all unlawful fees.

I initially thought it was because they mixed it up with credit card debt (which wasn't sold to Cabot, hence the £200 figure in my OP) but it turns out a lot of this debt is cash withdrawals.

Surely the interest argument won't work anymore?

Link to post
Share on other sites

concentrate on the OD.

 

as for the interest, it is the interest that OD fees attracted that is where it does still apply.

 

IE on xxx date the bank charged you say a £35 daily fee for being or using your OD.

from xxx date that fee every month got OD interest added to it, thats is what the CISHEET calculates as well as the refunding of the original unlawful fee.

 

so if you find each fee, pop it in, add their OD int rate to cell D15, you should end up with quite a balance, 

you dont enter say a statement line that might say OD interest for period xxx month to xxx month on the sheet, 

you cant reclaim OD interest but you can reclaim PD interest that charges attracted.

 

the only other bit of info you need is for the CLAIMTO date box on the CISHEET

that should be set to the last day OD interest was charged on the account, the statements should show that date. (probably sale date to CABOT)

 

after all that the CISHEET will give you a nice figure regarding what has unlawfully been added to the current account balance sold to cabot that should not be there as its unlawful

 

but the date of the sum will only have interest applicable till it ended.

as you have been deprived of investing this sum since that date, you are entitled to flat rate 8% interest on top of that sum from the day AFTER the OC's int stopped, till the day the sum is Dealt with. 

 

thats why you then use the STATINT sheet and input the CISHEET sum on the day AFTER the CISHEETS claimto date as a lump figure.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks so much dx, that makes a lot of sense!

 

Cabot is trying to get a sum that is still in dispute and if they tried to go to Court then they'd be chasing fees on top of the actual figure?

Is that right?

Sounds like a catch 22 for them lol. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They must abide by the pre action protocol 1st and issue a letter of claim .1st before court.

 

If you look in legal successes forum here there are numerous 'wins' by us over the same circs. We rarely lose an od claim

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Open

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Credit file doesn't determine sb status.

SB status is determined by your last written admission to the debt or last payment date. 

 If a court claim was issued within 6 years of either of the aforementioned points, then this stops the sb clock and then you're onto court procedures instead. 

Sb doesn't come into it then.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...