Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ACI are part of the Perch Capital group along with TM legal.  
    • Thanks jk2054 - email now sent to OCMC requesting an in person hearing.
    • You can easily argue your case with no sign on the nearest parking sign
    • Same issue got a fine yesterday for parking in suspended bay which was ending at 6:30 yesterday, next thing I see a fine 15 minutes before it. The sign was obstructed 
    • Hi all, an update on the case as the deadline for filing the WS is tomorrow i.e., 14 days before the hearing date: 7th June. Evri have emailed their WS today to the court and to myself. Attached pdf of their WS - I have redacted personal information and left any redactions/highlights by Evri. In the main: The WS is signed by George Wood. Evri have stated the claim value that I am seeking to recover is £931.79 including £70 court fees, and am putting me to strict proof as to the value of the claim. Evri's have accepted that the parcel is lost but there is no contract between Evri and myself, and that the contract is with myself and Packlink They have provided a copy of the eBay Powered By Packlink Terms and Conditions (T&Cs) to support their argument the contractual relationship is between myself and Packlink, highlighting clause 3a, e, g of these T&Cs. They further highlight clause 14 of the T&Cs which states that Packlink's liability is limited to £25 unless enhanced compensation has been chosen. They have contacted Packlink who informed them that I had been in contact with Packlink and raised a claim with Packlink and the claim had been paid accordingly i.e., £25 in line with the T&Cs and the compensated postage costs of £4.82. They believe this is clear evidence that my contract is with Packlink and should therefore cease the claim against Evri. Evri also cite Clause 23 of the pre-exiting commercial agreement between the Defendant and Packlink, which states:  ‘Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 A person who is not a party to this Agreement shall have no rights under the Contracts (Right of Third Parties) Act 1999 to rely upon or enforce any term of this Agreement provided that this does not affect any right or remedy of the third party which exists or is available apart from that Act.’ This means that the Claimant cannot enforce third party rights under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 and instead should cease this claim and raise a dispute with the correct party.   Having read Evri's WS and considered the main points above, I have made these observations: Evri have not seen/read my WS (sent by post and by email) as they would have recognised the claim value is over £1000 as it includes court fees, trial fees, postage costs and interests, and there is a complete breakdown of the different costs and evidence. Evri accepts the parcel is lost after it entered their delivery network - again, this is in my WS and is not an issue in dispute. Evri mentions the £25 and £4.82 paid by Packlink - Again, had they read the WS, they would have realised this is not an issue in dispute. Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency   This supports the view that once a user (i.e, myself) selects a transport agency (i.e Evri) that best suits the user's needs, the user (i.e, myself) enters into a contract with the chosen transport agency (i.e, myself). Therefore, under the T&Cs, there is a contract between myself and Evri. Evri cites their pre-existing agreement with Packlink and that I cannot enforce 3rd party rights under the 1999 Act. Evri has not provided a copy of this contract, and furthermore, my point above explains that the T&Cs clearly explains I have entered into a contract when i chose Evri to deliver my parcel.  As explained in my WS, i am the non-gratuitous beneficiary as my payment for Evri's delivery service through Packlink is the sole reason for the principal contract coming into existence. Clearly Evri have not read by WS as the above is all clearly explained in there.   I am going to respond to Evri's email by stating that I have already sent my WS to them by post/email and attach the email that sent on the weekend to them containing my WS. However, before i do that, If there is anything additional I should further add to the email, please do let me know. Thanks. Evri Witness Statement Redacted v1 compressed.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

£5000+ PCN, 35 unpaid tickets over 2 year period from UKPC


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2099 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Guys,

 

I'm new here and any help would be greatly appreciated.

 

Over the past 2 years i have received around 35 parking tickets from UKPC, the majority of which have been issued in my work place office car park. So far i have not replied and ignored any correspondence from UKPC and their debt collection agency.

 

Previously they have been sending all 'debt' letters separately but in July 2018 the debt collection agency have issued me with a letter accumulating the full amount (£5000+) and stating 35 tickets have been issued and that if i don't reply by 08/08/18 they will inform their 'client' to take legal action. It is now 23/08 and nothing has happened.

 

While most people online tell you to simple ignore them as speaking to them in any capacity makes you agree to their 'terms' and by ignoring them they have no power, i have since had a colleague in the same situation for a smaller amount £1500 had a CCJ taken out against his name and his car clamped!

 

This has now panicked me a tad bit and want to resolve the issue ASAP!

 

I can think of two options and would like to know what is best or if you guys have any other advice for me.

1). Call UKPC and negotiate to pay half the amount over the period of a year, or something. Saying i was not the driver (cannot give driver details as i don't know who was driving on the given dates) but would like to settle the issue regardless, not accepting fault but wanting to settle this none the less. Do you think it is likely they would agree to these terms? Also how on earth do i get into contact with a person at UKPC as they have no number and hard to find someone to get into contact with! I don't want to go through the number provided on the debt collector as i assume they have no power and will request the full amount.

 

2). As i said the majority of tickets were issued at my place of work, if i am able to get a email on a headed page or headed paper from the building manager/security guard who is employed by the property management company who look after our office, who i assume engage UKPC, saying that there was an issue with my permit and that i shouldn't have received the tickets (along the lines of this) then forward this to UKPC. Again i have the issue of trying to contact someone at UKPC and then i can say i will pay any other tickets issued at another location but i want may void any of the ones issued at my place of work.

 

Sorry for the lengthy post but quite a large amount of money of which i neither want to or can afford to pay. Is there any advice you guys could give me about what to do and how to get hold of a person at UKPC.

 

Many thanks,

 

Kyman595

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignoring was a terrible idea, on what planet does "speaking to them is accepting their terms"?

 

You accepted their terms when a contract was made when you parked your vehicle on private land, the contract was entered into by way of your performance (parking and remaining on the land in question), the terms of this agreement were set out and communicated via the signage.

 

UKPC are litigious, and for the amount you claim is owed, will almost certainly issue a claim against you shortly, the fact that you've ignored 35 tickets will go down like a lead balloon in court.

 

In response to your numbered points, having actively fought parking companies;

 

1. I cannot see them accepting half, and I certainly cannot see them allowing you to pay it off over a year. The drivers identity in cases like this isn't relevant, when you have 35 tickets, a court will most likely find on the balance of probability that you were driving on all occasions (as per a case in Scotland where a lady found herself with a £25k judgment). Assuming UKPC are using Debt Recovery Plus, then you are correct in that DRP have no power.

 

2. If you had consent to park, then you need to get this in writing and be ready to send UKPC a letter outlining this asap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello mch1991,

 

Thanks for your response and yes can see now this was a bad idea.

 

Point 2 i can do and am getting a letter tomorrow from the building secuirty desk guy along the lines of ' Vehicle reg:XXXXXXX had permission to park on property: X from X to X period' Would this suffice and or would you recommend i get any more info? Also my issue is who to speak to, is it best just to email UKPC with this information or speak to the debt recovery people regarding this?

 

Many thanks

 

Kyman 595

Link to post
Share on other sites

read the letter properly

 

it doesn't say inform it says may and instruct.

 

I can instruct my dog to sit

if it does is a totally diff matter

 

getting that letter off to UKPCM [NOT EMAIL]

 

ignore the DCA

they are NOT BAILIFFS

and have

ZERO legal powers to anything

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Communicate to UKPC by post, so everything is in writing.

 

That's a start, send UKPC a copy showing that the landowner/leaseholder granted you the authorisation to park,

 

UKPC signage will be forbidding in that it doesn't offer a genuine service to those who park without a permit, essentially bringing the contract into question as per PCM UK Ltd vs Christopher Bull and 2 others 2016 and UKPC vs Sean Masterson 2016.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that is helpful to know.

 

But how do i resolve the issue, you guys seem to know your stuff.

 

How would you start this process?

 

Write a letter to UKPC stating i did in fact have authorisation to park my vehicle and that any PCN's should be dropped that were issued in that property and that any other PCN's i would be happy to settle immediately?

 

Could anyone offer a helping hand with a letter template of some sorts to start this process off, how to word ect?

 

I really don't want to go to court....

Edited by kyman595
Link to post
Share on other sites

takeout the works ones for now, I think they can be sorted by the letter

 

what others do you have?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay just to clarify i am send a letter to UKPC stating i had in fact permission by the landlord of the property to park please find attached document from a representative and employee of the property management company that speak on the landlords behalf?

Something along those lines?

 

(sorry i'm very bad with legal things! only 20 years of age and my first run in with this sort of thing!)

From what you saying your confident they will drop these? (my main concern as this amounts to around 75%+ of the tickets)

 

With the other PCN's were when i parked in an half abandoned office block opposite, ran but UKPC as well.

I don't know if i have any defence with these as i just parked there.

To be fair the signs are very old and the back side of the building abandoned (broken glass ect).

 

I know a 'ticket issuer' (if thats what they're called lol) that works for UKPC (brought him a few coffee's in the winter months when i saw him, so he likes me). Would he be of any help, i assume the foot soldiers have no power but is it worth an ask?

Edited by kyman595
Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like the others aren't enforceable either then.

there's probably no contract with whom OWNS the land anyway if its derelict.

were these windscreen tickets too?

 

yes a simple letter from the employers of UKPC that you have and have always had permission to park there is all you need

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I say half abandoned as some of the office is still in use. it is a busy office street so i would assume all the land is owned in some way or the other.

 

Is there anyway to check this at all?

 

These are all windscreen tickets yes.

If there is a way out of these also i would be grateful to know.

 

Sorry just so i understand the last part..... do you mean an employee of UKPC (ie ticket issuer/warden)?? or do you mean a letter from the property management of my office building?

 

Essentially there is a building at the front and another at the back, the back one is abandoned and boarded up.

Debris and glass in the car park.

 

Is there anyway to check this at all or request from UKPC who they hold the contract for the land with?

 

I would assume (probably wrongly it looks) that UKPC wouldn't just chuck signs on random walls and in force parking charges where no one has asked them to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would assume (probably wrongly it looks) that UKPC wouldn't just chuck signs on random walls and in force parking charges where no one has asked them to.

 

 

now that does show how green you are ...yes 1000's of places still have signs up whereby there is no current contract with the LAND OWNER for UKPC [and alike] to manage carparking!!

 

 

local council website planning debt will tell you who owns the land.

 

 

as for the letter

if you works/whomever issue the permits to park to their workers then they can equally get any tickets cancelled so get a letter from them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh okay, ill have a look into that then.

 

So if i can get a letter from the property management and even better a letter from their worker as well and send this then i should be golden.

 

Again i ask, please tell me if there is not or you cannot, but i have seen some posts with letter templates you can send to these pirates, would you have such a template?

 

Really appreciate all your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it wouldn't fit to your situation even if there was one.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

letter from DCA is meaningless and worthless so ignore them.

 

Now, you say MOST of the tickets are from work so my question is where are the others from?

They would be best dealt with as separate threads if they can be isolated easily.

 

Now, do you still have the tikcets ans NTK's that UKPC issued?

If you have then telling us about them in chronological order would be helpful along with the dates the NTK's were issued.

 

The person who got a CCJ and car clamped clearly igniored the court forms and then did nothing after judgement was granted, a position that you arent going to leave yourself in.

 

As already said UKPC probably signed a 1 year deal with someone at the site, you mention a property management co so most likely them.

this means there is no direct link to the landowner so the parking co cant actually claim a right to do anything in their own name.

 

This is called performamce of a contract and the textbook example is I offer to sell you London Bridge and that is perfectly legal to do so.

I then sue you for not buying it when you say you will and that is perfectly legal.

It only goes wrong when you ask for the deeds to the bridge and as I dont actually own it I cant perform my side of the contract and you can sue me.

 

Now this may sound odd that I can offer you somehting i dont own but it happens all the time in the city with short selling of shares where a person borrows shares and sells them to buy them back again at a lower price and then gives the shares back to the original owner.

 

Now there are risks involved in this and the same goes for UKPC,

they can carry on as they are but if you challenge them they are doomed to lose their claim because they dont have the right to be there.

As long as people pay up or dont challenge court claims these bandits will carry on making money when they have no right to ask for a penny.

 

So, things you can do in the meanwhile.

get pictures of the carpark where you work and ask your bosses to tell you what arrangements they have with landowner for parking

(if not with landowner then ask who with)

 

Also, is a permit scheme in place and if so who actually issues the permits?

employer, land agent or parking co.

That will all tell us a great deal of what we need to know to help you.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

to be honest i want to scare them off this so they don't send a court notice.

From what i know, the property management company contract UKPC to enforce parking,

so my idea of getting a letter from the property management giving me authorisation to park will hopefully get them to drop these.

 

This would me not to require them to provide deeds of the property ect?

Also how would i even go about this.

 

I have NO letters from UKPC (binned, silly me) when they send in a picture of the car with the date of 'offence' ect so i don't know which ones will have been issued at work or across the road.

 

All PCN's where issued from 02/16-01/18

 

I was thinking of sending a letter just saying:

'I have received PCN's from your company for parking 'offences' at the property X for vehicle reg X.

However these have been issued in error as i had authorisation to park here from X company who mangers the property X of which is my place of work.

 

Please can you confirm any and all PCN's issued at this property have been dropped/made void by writing.

If there are any other PCN's outstanding against vehicle reg X please send me a list of dates and the location of the supposed 'offence' so these can also be resolved quickly.

 

Then attach the letter from the property management company.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

i have received a letter this morning from SCS Law with each ticket and date shown and the location (in a table).

instead of £5000+ showing they are now telling me the total is £2500?

Below half what the Debt Recovery plus are asking for?

 

they are still directing me to the debt recovery stating i need to pay their CLIENT in full.

Debt recovery isn't their client???

and there is no number for the solicitors or UKPC on this letter.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

So the DCS has paid a lawyer to send you a threatogram.

That can be ignored the same way as the DCA letters.

 

Now concentarte on what you have been asked and tell us what you still have regarding these tickets and get us pictures of the signage and answer the questions about the landowner, your employer and any managing agents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have received a letter this morning from SCS Law with each ticket and date shown and the location (in a table).

instead of £5000+ showing they are now telling me the total is £2500?

Below half what the Debt Recovery plus are asking for?

 

they are still directing me to the debt recovery stating i need to pay their CLIENT in full.

Debt recovery isn't their client???

and there is no number for the solicitors or UKPC on this letter.

 

SCS Law do regularly issue claims on behalf of UKPC, however if they're stating to pay DRP, then as above, ignore and focus on communication with UKPC.

 

I hate to say it, but for 35 tickets, I guarantee you that UKPC will issue a claim, it's a shame that you didn't respond to each one and obtain a POPLA code, it would've cost them £27 plus VAT per code.

 

You should also write to the DVLA requesting the dates of when UKPC requested your data, they must make a separate application each time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...