Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UKPC Windscreen PCN - no permit - works parking - NW106JP , Sunbeam road


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2233 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello , I was issued a ticket on an industrial estate where I worked for not displaying a permit .

 

My car was parked outside of our unit , i was one of two employees who were ticketed in the same week for not having a permitt . Parking permitts are issued by the company but there are never enough to go round , visitors forget to hand them back in or they get lost .

 

I contacted head office who were going to deal with this but yesterday i recieved a " notification letter " stating they had already sent out a previous letter in regards to this matter . This is the first communication i have had from UKPC & i thought it had been dealt with as the " offence" occurred at the beginning of December . I have since changed jobs .

 

UKPC are threatening court action , the amount they are claiming is £100 . I am looking for advise on how to procceed .

 

Many thanks

 

Fred

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are threatening...... yes, like I could threaten a plague of locusts if you dont pay.

 

First of all where your employers unit is does it have designated parking in a larger car park or is it a self contained area?

 

Secondly what does the signage there say as this isnt a fine, it is a contractual matter and we need to know about the contract offered by UKPC and whetehr there is any relevance to the issue of permits in the first place.

 

UKPC are irresolute liars when it comes to matters like this, they say they have attached tickets on vehicles when they havent, they send out incorrect NTK aand then when they realise they have screwed up send them out again with a false date on to make it look like it was correctly issued.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

The units have no allocated parking , all employees or visitors try to park outside the respective business .

 

There is 6 units all in a row so a lot of deliveries , visitors & traffic .

 

There is a sign on a wall but I don't know what it states .

 

I no longer work for the company so not able to look unless I make a special visit .

 

Thanks

 

Fred

Link to post
Share on other sites

The location is NW106JP , Sunbeam road .

 

The letter is headed " Notification Letter " in red ink .

 

The letter claims they wrote me previously , I have received no " other " letter .

 

Your vehicle was in breach of the terms & conditions which were clearly displayed & this was agreed by the driver when your vehicle was parked on private land .

 

Despite issuing a parking charge & writing to you previously we have not received a payment ,

as the 28 days has elapsed , you , the registered keeper of the vehicle can be made liable for the parking charge .

 

If full payment is not made within 14 days , or you have not provided the drivers details then the charge will be passed to our debt collection agency .

 

Following on from this , & if necessary , we will commence county court proceedings against you for the outstanding amount , interest & court costs . If the court orders judgement against you , & payment is not made , a warrant may also be issued for the court appointed bailiff to recover payment , at this point you would also become liable for additional fees of the enforcement agency .

 

Many thanks

 

Fred

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the road on Google Streetview (though this may have changed since the images were captured) there are so many differing signs all along that road that relate to parking restrictions of one form or another. UKPC aren't going to stand a chance of "proving" what they claim to manage and what they don't.

 

Do you live anywhere near there now that you could have a wander down the road taking pictures of anything and everything that relates to parking. If it is the same there now their claim is a non starter. All you'd need to say is that you were obeying one of the many other parking signs and didn't see theirs.

 

Again, assuming that it's the same now. There are signs from FlashPark, UKPC, It looks like CPM though I can't quite make out the logo as well as many others that have just been nailed to anything that didn't move fast enough.

 

It looks like an explosion in a parking signs factory :lol:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

date of letter and date of supposed event.

 

I am helping a friend with a UKPC matter and the correspondence he has received is outside the protocols of the POFA so I suspect that they have decided that they have failed so badly to keep within the law they are now just inventing their own phrases and sending out letters at random and saying they comply when they know they dont.

 

No notices at all at the entrance to the estate and most of the signs scattered about are prohibitive in nature so you cant be sued for a breach of contract as there isnt one, just possible trespass.

 

Now your problem is UKPC are REEAAALY thick so they will probably take this further and for that reason decent pictures of exactly where you were parked would be very useful. Also knowing who your company's landlord is would help so give us some detail into the name of your co and we will try and dig a bit.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ericsbrother ,

the date of the first letter I received was 05/02/2018 , but they claim to have sent previous correspondence which I have no knowledge of .

 

I will make a trip over during the week as the gates run on an entry card system & as I no longer work for the company I cant access the road on a weekend .

 

Would it be OK to send you the company name via PM as I don't want to alert UKPC on a public forum? .

 

The company I worked for asked for a scan of the parking charge & were going to contact UKPC as 2 of us were ticketed in a week & they are a constant pain to visitors etc. .

 

I also have no knowledge of what, if anything, was done but they were also making noises about contacting the landlord because of UKPC .

 

My car was parked directly outside the unit by the entry door ,

whoever issued the ticket would know that it belonged to an employee of this unit but obviously they don't care .

 

Many thanks for your help , it is greatly appreciated

 

The date on the letter , 05/02/2018 , I did not receive the letter until 07/02/2018 .

Link to post
Share on other sites

date of the parking event was?

 

you cant half read things and expect proper help. Start paying attention very carefully to what is written here and in the letters you receive as with most things the devil is in the detail

 

as for playing grandmothers footsteps with the name of the company, you dont work for them any more so it wont matter. It wouldnt identify you anyway so start helping yourself. If UKPC employ someone who can read then good, they may start to learn form their many mistakes if they read these pages and learn to behave and possibly keep their directors out of prison with their new found knowledge.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

date of the parking event was?

you cant half read things and expect proper help. Start paying attention very carefully to what is written here and in the letters you receive as with most things the devil is in the detail

as for playing grandmothers footsteps with the name of the company, you dont work for them any more so it wont matter. It wouldnt identify you anyway so start helping yourself. If UKPC employ someone who can read then good, they may start to learn form their many mistakes if they read these pages and learn to behave and possibly keep their directors out of prison with their new found knowledge.

 

Parking ticket was issued on 04/12/2017. Issued at 13.45.

 

Company - Medstrom , 13-15 sunbeam road , NW10 6JP.

 

As previously stated , I did not receive the first letter , the only letter I have received is dated 05/12/2018 .

Link to post
Share on other sites

UKPC are famous for their "disappearing ticket" windscreen tickets. they have been prosecuted for it and it has been witnessed may times and works like this. The attendant paces a ticket on the car, photorgaphs it in situ and then removes it so te first thing the motorist knows about it is when receiveing the NTK a month later. Why do this? It negates the discount period and makes it harder for people to remember what they were doing that day and they wont be able to phtograph their own vehicle to show discrepancies with the ticket information ( very useful when the attendant alters his clock to make it look like an overstay has occurred)

Post up the letter you got as UKPC also dont send out the NTK's properly and tyhe claim th badly worded letter isnt the NTK but just a polite reminder before the official NTK (often too late).

So letter too late to be a NTK that creates a keeper liability as that must arrive between 29-56 days after the date of the event.

So, this may well be the correct letter just not sent at the correct time and it may be worthless to UKPC bcause the wording is wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

also, is company involved in othotics, orthopaedics etc. If not what is the nature of their business. There are good reasons for asking this.

 

The company's business is medical equipment supply , bed management in hospitals & maintenance contracts . I am a service engineer , we had a 4hr response time when alerted by hospitals. I will get the letter scanned & uploaded tomorrow , what happens about the time scale of 14 days to pay or else ? .

Link to post
Share on other sites

what happens about the time scale of 14 days to pay or else ? .

 

You let them go for "or else" and waste their money. You don't owe them a single penny and if they try taking you to court, they may just end up owing you a few quid on top of what they've already spent :wink:

 

Can we please get some up to date pictures of signage, if the signs that appear on Googly Streetnose from 2016 are still there, then that's just another trap that they're going to fall in to :lol:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reason I asked is because the company is in such a parlous state financially they are barred from enetering into any contracts with anyone without their bank's say so and this has been the case since 2011. That menas that even agreeing to a permit scheme is theoretically outside their demesne. That leave you in a position whre UKPC can never offer you anything and any scheme for parking wouldnt apply and you would be trespassing and that it outside the interest of UKPC. This isnt something that should be argued on its own but as an extra nail in their coffin

The company's business is medical equipment supply , bed management in hospitals & maintenance contracts . I am a service engineer , we had a 4hr response time when alerted by hospitals. I will get the letter scanned & uploaded tomorrow , what happens about the time scale of 14 days to pay or else ? .
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello , sorry for the delay in this matter but I have been away on an urgent family matter so priorities needed elsewhere.

 

OK, I have had a final letter from in regards to this matter from UKPC`s debut collectors , informing me that I have until the 22nd of March to pay the outstanding amount of 160.00 , make arrangements to do so or they will recommend their client proceeds with court action . I have never made contact with either UKPC or their debut collection department

 

I have a photo of the signage that is in place at the units but I can`t work out how to upload it on here , any help is greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

Fred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hover your mouse over the word upload and a pop up window will appear with a link to the uploading guide :wink:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok 2 things about this.

1 you were authorised and as such UKPC dont have a reason to claim a breach of contract

the sign say No unauthorised parking so if you didnt have authorisation then you arent being offered anything so no contract to breach. their demand isnt for a contractual consideration because thereis no genuine offer of anything just a sign saying "go away". If you dont go away then the landowner may decide that your vehicle can be removed from there but where to? Not the public highway and the shifitng will be at their own expense. however this is nowt to do with mickey mouse parking ltd as they dont have any aauthority ro right to make that decision and the POF was brought in because clamping and removal by third parties is now illegal and severely limited even if a landowner wants to.

the letters from the dca are just hollow threats, they have no interest in any of this and note that they have added the usual £60 unicorn food tax as well without explaining how this came about. they do this as peopel think that if they delay any furhter the amount will go up to £100 million and their granny will be impounded until they pay. All unlawful but TS arent interested

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok 2 things about this.

1 you were authorised and as such UKPC dont have a reason to claim a breach of contract

the sign say No unauthorised parking so if you didnt have authorisation then you arent being offered anything so no contract to breach. their demand isnt for a contractual consideration because thereis no genuine offer of anything just a sign saying "go away". If you dont go away then the landowner may decide that your vehicle can be removed from there but where to? Not the public highway and the shifitng will be at their own expense. however this is nowt to do with mickey mouse parking ltd as they dont have any aauthority ro right to make that decision and the POF was brought in because clamping and removal by third parties is now illegal and severely limited even if a landowner wants to.

the letters from the dca are just hollow threats, they have no interest in any of this and note that they have added the usual £60 unicorn food tax as well without explaining how this came about. they do this as peopel think that if they delay any furhter the amount will go up to £100 million and their granny will be impounded until they pay. All unlawful but TS arent interested

 

Thanks for the info , as I have never contacted UKPC / debut collectors or appealed in this matter . Should I continue to ignore ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...