Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

informant of death/signed for Death cert - person died in council hse - am i now responsible for the debts?


Villaman
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2311 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone tell me the legal responsibilities of a person who signs for a death certificate as the informant of death.

 

The deceased left no will as no money or property is involved.

 

The deceased lived alone in council property and the only finances were all used to cover funeral expenses.

 

Anything of value has been divided equally between family members with all in agreement.

 

The only items left are furnishings etc,

do the family have to pay for these to be removed or will the council take care of this when the property is handed back.

 

Any other responsilities for the signee of the death certificate?

 

There are a few unpaid utility bills outstanding totally less than £300

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

the council will charge the earth to clear the place an try and bill the estate

but as there nowt they'll get nowhere

 

same for the outstanding bills etc.

 

all the debts die with him.

 

not your problem

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Common misconception.

Debt does not die with the person.

 

All the deceased assets are pooled and is mow known as the estate.

 

All the deceaseds bills and debts are paid out of this. Any surplus then goes to the next of kin or distributed as per the wills instruction.

 

If there's no assets in the estate then the debts are written off.

They cannot be passed on.

 

The only thing here is it sounds like you have not gone thru probate.

 

You state that anything of value have already been split with the family but there are outstanding bills.

 

You cannot do it that way.

 

The creditors may have legal recourse on that

Link to post
Share on other sites

The possessions that were split are only of sentimental value,

 

The complete total of "financial wealth" of the deceased was paid directly by the bank to the funeral directors and that account is now empty and closed,

 

so as such there is no estate to speak of,

its no hardship for us to all chip in and pay the outstanding utilty bills.

 

Just asking about the legalities of signing a death certificate as the informant of death,

 

does this person legally become the executor if the deceased hasnt appointed one and no will exists.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Common misconception.

Debt does not die with the person.

 

All the deceased assets are pooled and is mow known as the estate.

 

All the deceaseds bills and debts are paid out of this. Any surplus then goes to the next of kin or distributed as per the wills instruction.

 

If there's no assets in the estate then the debts are written off.

They cannot be passed on.

 

The only thing here is it sounds like you have not gone thru probate.

 

You state that anything of value have already been split with the family but there are outstanding bills.

 

You cannot do it that way.

 

The creditors may have legal recourse on that

 

:lol:

so as I said

the debts die with HIM.

why pontificate...

 

I didn't say for every situation..

in this one it applies....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

does this person legally become the executor if the deceased hasnt appointed one and no will exists.

 

no they don't as above

 

go enjoy your life stop worrying.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies,

Its not me thats worrying I didnt sign the death certificate.

 

I may have complicated things slightly.

The exact situation is My mother passed away recently and I am in the process of trying to obtain succession of tenancy with the council.

 

The problem is my brother who signed the death certificate believes he will be financially liable for any debt etc I build up while going through this process, like running up electric, gas, phone bills etc which are all in my mothers name at the moment.

 

I have every intention of paying these myself but older brothers being as they are,

he thinks that if things go south regarding the tenancy I'll just walk away leaving him with debts.

 

Ive tried to explain to him that he isnt liable but he knows better!!!!

because his name is on the death certificate.

Edited by Villaman
added info
Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:

so as I said

the debts die with HIM.

why pontificate...

 

I didn't say for every situation..

in this one it applies....

 

 

In this case it does but not in every case.

So it makes it clear to someone reading the replys that debt does not die in every case which could of been surmised by your reply. Is quite important

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just asking about the legalities of signing a death certificate as the informant of death,

 

does this person legally become the executor if the deceased hasnt appointed one and no will exists.

you mean when registering the death at the registry office.

at the office they might ask for someone to be the personal representative for hmrc purposes.?

that aside, next of kin usually becomes the person dealing, but they are not responsible for any personal debts.

as the estate is small, no grant or probate would be required.

 

re inheriting tenancy (any arrears owed by the person inheriting the tenancy)

https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/council_housing_association/can_you_inherit_a_council_tenancy

Link to post
Share on other sites

What kind of HMRC purposes? Next of kin is a tricky one, My elder brother is named as next of kin of my mothers passport, my sister is named as next of kin on all medical documents and there is another eldest brother, does he not become next of kin being the eldest?

 

But in a nutshell, The bother who signed for the death certificate is not legally responsible for anything? Only that he informed the resistry of death?

Edited by Villaman
Added Info
Link to post
Share on other sites

basically, any 'next of kin' can 'deal' if there's no stipulation otherwise. and if more than one all are happy with whomever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tax liabilities? What about overpaid benefits, I.E housing etc. If the deceased was receiving them but wasnt entitled to? 99% certain this isnt the case but you never know, just covering every eventuality. I need to put his mind at ease as he is a panicker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the reason to be clear over DX's "sweeping" statement that debt dies with the person.

 

It does not.

In this case there is no estate so debt is written off and cannot be passed to another person.

But what if there was an estate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tax liabilities? What about overpaid benefits, I.E housing etc. If the deceased was receiving them but wasnt entitled to? 99% certain this isnt the case but you never know, just covering every eventuality. I need to put his mind at ease as he is a panicker.

if hmrc think there is any outstanding tax in their remit owing then they'll prob demand it regardless on the personal rep.

but, it seems you are referring to dwp issues which may be different. not sure on that tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if hmrc think there is any outstanding tax in their remit owing then they'll prob demand it regardless on the personal rep.

but, it seems you are referring to dwp issues which may be different. not sure on that tbh.

 

My mother was on state pension so no involvement with HMRC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies,

Its not me thats worrying I didnt sign the death certificate.

 

I may have complicated things slightly.

The exact situation is My mother passed away recently and I am in the process of trying to obtain succession of tenancy with the council.

 

The problem is my brother who signed the death certificate believes he will be financially liable for any debt etc I build up while going through this process, like running up electric, gas, phone bills etc which are all in my mothers name at the moment.

 

I have every intention of paying these myself but older brothers being as they are,

he thinks that if things go south regarding the tenancy I'll just walk away leaving him with debts.

 

Ive tried to explain to him that he isnt liable but he knows better!!!!

because his name is on the death certificate.

 

oh well that's his problem

yours is staying in the council home...

which cold prove difficult as the tenancy might not well ascend to you.

esp if you have not lived there ....

nor are known to the council via say voters CTAX bill or otherwise.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh well that's his problem

yours is staying in the council home...

which cold prove difficult as the tenancy might not well ascend to you.

esp if you have not lived there ....

nor are known to the council via say voters CTAX bill or otherwise.

 

I've told him as much. I do have proof of living there but not electoral or council tax bill. Its mainly bank statements and utility accounts over the past 12 moonths. The property is a secure tenancy hasnt been handed down through succession previously and has been my mothers home for the past 54 years. I did live there previously but that was over 20 years ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 'informant of death' has no legal resp to Creditors', just the 'Estate'.

Anyone dying 'intestate' (no Will) should have a Court appointed Executor/family rep who can decide deceased Estate falls below Probate threshold.

Debt does not disappear on death but poss on presumed Grant of Probate.

Unless you can show continuous occupation at your Mother's address for 2yr at time of her death (CTax/Electoral roll entries) the Council MAY grant Succession if your Mother was the initial named T on AST.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Sorry for you loss.

 

As for Council Tenancy Succession have a look at this link: https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/council_housing_association/can_you_inherit_a_council_tenancy

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did live there previously but that was over 20 years ago.

seems then it might be difficult to inherit it, given the shelter link posted #9

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you had read the original post you would of noticed that assets were distributed before creditors paid.

It was only in a further post the point was clarified as of sentimental value only.

So it was important to tell the complete process.

 

I still stand that your statement of debts die with the person is not, in entirely, true.

 

could of been serious ramifications if it was found out That assets ofvalue were distributed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...