Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

business to business CCJ - now notice of issue of warrant of control


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2364 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok all, im in need of help, i have asked on another forum but just wanted more advice if possible

 

i started a LTD company less tham a year ago

it was going well, but some bad business decisions have quickly turned the good to bad

 

i have a 3 debts with suppliers,

one at £2.5k

one at £3k and

one at £2700

 

the £2700 got a ccj against the company

 

i was paying 500 a month but cant afford to pay it, now i have received a notice of issue of warrant of control.

 

The registered office address was my home until recently when i changed it,

i now use one of the online registered office services things

 

sorry not sure what its called exactly, so its now different to my home

 

the issue of warrant letter came to my house as it was sent before i updated the details with the supplier which i have now done

 

im worried that bailiffs are going to turnup and start taking my families stuff,

we dont have much,

an old car in my partners name,

the usual tv sons xbox and a few other bits,

nothing of great value

 

just hoping someone can tell me what i can do,

i really couldnt face the family if the bailiffs came and took stuff

im finding it hard to look my kids and partner in the eyes now as i feel like a total failure

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the judgement was against the limited company then they will only be able to take things that belonged to the limited company. It's very clear that family belongings and items which clearly belong to children will have nothing to do with your business.

 

Also, have you contacted them to let them know the new registration address of the company? However, if they think that there may be items belonging to the business at your home address then regardless of the address change, they may seek to take those.

 

I'm afraid that sudden changes of address only invite suspicion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its a business debt they cant touch your house hold at all

 

is this from county court bailiffs?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

retitled and moved to the bailiff forum

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it has

"in the county court business centre " on it if that helps

 

oh and make payment to the county court

 

If the judgement was against the limited company then they will only be able to take things that belonged to the limited company. It's very clear that family belongings and items which clearly belong to children will have nothing to do with your business.

 

Also, have you contacted them to let them know the new registration address of the company? However, if they think that there may be items belonging to the business at your home address then regardless of the address change, they may seek to take those.

 

I'm afraid that sudden changes of address only invite suspicion.

 

contacted which ones? the county court or the creditor, the creditor i have yes, the county court i have not as i didnt know i had to and only just got the notice

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest this is county court bailiff not a high court bailiff?

you could submit an n245to the court and vary the payment this will satisfy the bailiff action

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply, the thing is, i was paying £500 a month

the company has now ceased trading and i cant afford £500, i will be getting a full time job soon but it wont enable me to pay that much

i will only be able to pay £50 a monnth at most i expect.

 

also i want to get the company struck of, i have sent a letter to the creditors explaining that i have no money and no assets and that the company is ceased trading

Link to post
Share on other sites

N245 is in the legal section of our library

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks

 

the problem i have is i have put every penny from my personal account in to the company

so i am potless

 

i wont even have the £50 until 2 weeks time when i get paid from a new full time job, which is a week after the deadline for the payment on the notice

Link to post
Share on other sites

ring the bailiff and tell him tomorrow

they are understanding..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

try post 13

ex160 forms are in the same legal folder of our library as the N245

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks all

the thing im worried about is not being able to get the forms sent of in time

i dont have a printer, well i do but cant afford to refill it, so printing the forms is proving difficult as i dont have anyone to ask

 

 

just a couple questions, ive sent letters to all the creditors saying ive ceased trading etc

obviously i have this notice of warrant of control

so i assume the bailiffs will come if i cant get the forms to them quick enough

 

if they come can they force entry at any point?, even if they have been a couple times but we dont let them in

 

if they did come in, would they accept that nothing in the house is owned by the company, its obviously not, except maybe the laptop which they could take

if i send the ds01 for to companies house i guess the creditors will object against it

can they do this every time i send a form in?

if i wasnt at the house as in moved out, would the bailiffs still want to gain entry even though i have changed registered address

last thing i want to do is move out but if it means the kids dont get dragged through it i will

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cannot force entry to your home

nor will a court bailiff want too.

 

forget what you see on TV those are HCEO's.

 

your best bet is to go read a few like threads that I pointed you too in post 12 link.

 

FYI: when you go read those threads you'll get the above answered better than we ever can..

like the forms goto the court he came from not to him, just phone him and tell him what you are proposing.

 

go read those threads!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks dx

 

and i did read through some, but i was confused

a couple said to fill out the n255 ? form to suspend the warrant

 

but on there it asks for my income and outgoings

thing is its a company debt, and that company has ceased trading, so it has no incoming or outgoings

 

or does it mean my personal finances, will i be responsible for the debt if its a ltd company thats ceased trading?

 

im sure the answers are on the threads but i struggle reading and making sense of what i read, then end up getting confused and shouting at the dog hahaha

 

also i read on one that a bailiff can force entry to business address, and this was the registered office address until i changed it last week

Link to post
Share on other sites

N255 is a request for judgement

you are not the claimant fo cant request judgement..

 

get the n245 and the ex160 running ASAP.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fill in DS01 and file at companies house.

 

If a creditor disagrees they can pay to fight it.

 

Legally all the debts are the ltd entity. You should not have been paying them personally unless you signed a PG, even then if not named on the judgement, not for you to pay.

 

https://www.gov.uk/strike-off-your-company-from-companies-register/close-down-your-company

Link to post
Share on other sites

I started a LTD company less tham a year ago, it was going well, but some bad business decisions have quickly turned the good to bad

 

The £2700 got a CCJ against the company, i was paying £500 a month but cant afford to pay it, now I have received a notice of issue of warrant of control.

 

The registered office address was my home until recently when I changed it, I now use one of the online registered office services things.

 

I'm worried that bailiffs are going to turn up and start taking my families stuff, we dont have much, an old car in my partners name, the usual tv sons xbox and a few other bits, nothing of great value. I'm finding it hard to look my kids and partner in the eyes now as i feel like a total failure.

 

As I see it, the enforcement of the warrant is with the County Court. Thankfully, it has not been passed to a High Court Enforcement company so that in itself makes the position a great deal easier.

 

I would suggest that you speak with the County Court bailiff office to inform them that you have received notification of the warrant and that you wish to make him aware that the company has ceased trading and that you have acted responsibly and applied to have the company dissolved at Companies House. State that making and application to vary the judgment (by way of N245) is not a solution given the application to companies house.

 

You need to ensure that the creditor is also aware of the steps that you are taking.

 

A County Court bailiff will not be trying to gain entry into your home so please try to put that thought out of your mind. In any event, even if that step were taken (which will not be the case), a bailiff may only take goods belonging to the Limited company (the debtor). That in itself will resolve the matter of household items.

 

Finally, I note your final comment that you consider that you have somehow failed your family. That is also a myth as well. The following figures come from Companies House:

 

In the 12 months to 31 March 2016, there were 611,372 company incorporations and 399,736 dissolutions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...