Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You need to choose between ET and small claims, you cannot do both. For straightforward wages I'd go small claims. Faster and less messing about. Advice here Employment claims in the civil courts - Working Families WORKINGFAMILIES.ORG.UK Some types of employment-related claims can be brought in the civil courts, rather than in an Employment Tribunal. This advice page offers a high level...  
    • The garages are used - just car currently being fixed.  I have no need of what they offer.  It is conscious trespass - and the law allows. Which is frustrating.  It's just v annoying that they do this. Isn't there a law that someone cannot prevent access to a public highway from private land?
    • The problem with sending it too early is that Jake might try to write something called a Supplemental Witness Statement to undermine yours.  It would be better to send yours right on the court's deadline. The problem is that we don't know when that is.  In 90% of cases it's 14 days before the court's deadline, so 21/06.  However, in the odd case the judge decides differently.  
    • Signs and notes on windscreens wouldn't deter me either. after all. it's private land and very little deterrent to stop drivers from abusing it. A physical barrier, IMHO is the only way you will stop them abusing it.....or, depending on what businesses they are, why not rent out your garage to them, ask them for a staff discount if you purchase anything from them? Whilst it is irksome, how much money have you got to throw at it, and is it really that important in your life? If you were using your garage, different story.
    • Still worried about time order - they have not followed procedures. Looking through lists there are some items not been sent, incorrect leaflets sent.  emails sent and we’ve not received. Texts and emails sent and not completed process. Pages worth.  The worst thing is the phone calls. Not got more than 8 minutes of most.  it’s so unfair.  Have sent them emails offering to pay right back to March. All arrears were paid back.  2 payments since.    what other info do you require from me ?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

rights with HMOs and having a baby. ljust told her she has to be out by Monday!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2472 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I don't suppose you know Anything about tenancy/letting agents.

 

It's just my friend has had a premature baby and has just got back home.

 

Now the letting agents have just told her she has to be out by Monday.

She lives in a HMO and I'm not sure what her rights are.

 

Any help would be very appreciated.

 

Strongdumplin

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

My friend has just had a premature baby and just got out of hospital and today the letting agent came round and told her she has to leave by next week.

 

She lives in a HMO and I'm don't know what her rights are..

 

Any help very much appreciated.

 

Strongdumplin

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you give more info please. Such as reasons, background etc

 

Your friend can also talk to shelter who have people that specialise in things like this.

 

also https://www.gov.uk/private-renting/houses-in-multiple-occupation

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

She has live there with her partner and been for about 4 years, renting a room.

She and has been out of hospital for about two weeks.

 

The letting agent came round to show an empty room and kicked off, to the point she stated crying.

Told her had to leave by Monday. Then said the end of the week.

 

As far as I'm as I know all rent is put to date.

 

I just don't know what the tenancy rules are with her living in an HMO.

 

Are children allowed ext.

 

And would they have to serve a section 21.

 

Strongdumplin

Link to post
Share on other sites

What type of lease?

 

Who is the landlord - private? housing association?

 

What reason given for requiring her to leave?

 

You say the agent "told her to leave" but she is living there with her partner. Has he been told to leave too? ie has the tenancy been terminated or perhaps is the agent claiming that her partner is named on the lease but your friend is not so she has to go but he can stay?

 

More information needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's private let. Though an agent called tottalylet.

 

All he said to her was that they are not allowed to have a baby in the house and that they had to leave asap.

 

When see asked what that meant he said Monday or the end of the week at the latest.

 

I think she said it was a rolling 6 month tenancy. So a Shorthold Tenancy I believe.

 

Strongdumplin

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's private let. Though an agent called tottalylet.

 

All he said to her was that they are not allowed to have a baby in the house and that they had to leave asap.

 

When see asked what that meant he said Monday or the end of the week at the latest.

 

I think she said it was a rolling 6 month tenancy. So a Shorthold Tenancy I believe.

 

Strongdumplin

 

You think !

 

Need to know exactly so people can advise you accordingly

 

Does the LL live in the same property, did you sign AST when you 1st moved in, was a deposit paid and protected under one of the government schemes, is rent up to date ?

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...