Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
    • Weaknesses in some banks' security measures for online and mobile banking could leave customers more exposed to scammers, new data from Which? reveals.View the full article
    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord witheld deposit.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 247 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I will try to keep this as short as possible.

My husband and I moved into a house in March 2012 into owned by a private landlord

Never really had any trouble from them, we didn't give them any either. We always paid on time. 

We knew he was a bit dodgy though.  

In January 2017 my husband died suddenly.  I didn't leave until March 2020.

I didn't get my deposit back, it was £2100.

We were on friendly terms with the two brothers who owned the house. By varous means we knew that their mortgage was not buy-to-let, and I know that our deposit was not kept in a TDP (I checked).

In the run-up to my leaving, my landlord was very helpful with helping me with the garden and he sourced a skip for me, so I do appreciate that.

In February 2018 I asked my landlord for a new front door, and he agreed.  It should really have been replaced before we moved in but my husband didn't want to make a fuss. Still without a front door, a visitor (former friend of mine) kicked 4 panels glass panels out of the front door in a fit of rage. I reported it to the police who wouldn't do anything about it.  This was January 2020. 

As i had already been promised a new front door, I just patched up the panels, thinking my landlord would come and sort it.  I told him immediately.  He didn't replace the door until I had gone, so left me in the height of winter, living on my own with cardboard patching up and already flimsy door.  

The new door he had put in, taken out of my deposit, was definitely not 'like-for-like' and I know it cost about £1800, and if I had known this would happen I would have got my friend to put some glass in the panels for me.

Even since before I left I had asked him to keep me informed of anything he deemed necessary to replace and charge me for and he only kept being vague.  I never saw any receipts and he never asked me if he could do anything and I didn't see any evidence of work completed. 

I wrote to him once demanding evidence and he just rang me and fobbed me off. 

I have numerous texts messages, requesting this information also.

It has now been almost a year since our last contact.  I have been wanting to threaten him with court since the beginning, but I am scared of how much it will cost me, especially if I lose. I read somewhere I have 6 years to take action.

I'm just looking for some advice about what to do next please, and what chances I may have of winning, and also what is involved in legal action against a landlord?

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have a very high chance of winning – but please stand by for a further reply and request for further details – tomorrow or maybe even Monday.

In the meantime read up on this forum the steps involved in taking a small claim in the County Court.
In terms of the cost – you can do it yourself with our help. It won't cost you very much – and even if you lose, you will be shielded from the costs incurred by your landlord.
You will only have to bear your own costs. If you win, then you will get your claim for costs back from your landlord

 

How do you know that your landlord has not used a tenancy protected deposit scheme?

Could you contact one of the schemes or all of them and get confirmation of this in writing.

This is a necessary first step because if you can establish this beyond don't then you could be liable to an increased award in the courts

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies. Yes, I did ask all three of the TDSs - deposit protection Service, My Deposit, and Tenancy Deposit Scheme - I believe they are the only ones, but I did it over the phone. I will do it again and ask for it in writing this time, the email I used at the time is no longer in use.
 

Thanks

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you need to start putting together solid evidence in writing before you can begin the next step

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thank you.

Just to flag up that this is outside of my experience.

However, looking on the Internet it seems that there are pretty stringent penalties against landlords who failed to lodge deposits in one of the schemes.

I will try to find some useful links and post them up here. Maybe you could do the same.

As I can see, bringing an action against your landlord on this basis will be very cheap and on the basis of what you say, your chances of success are much better than 95%.

Do you have an address for your landlord? In other words does your landlord have assets which you can proceed against when you get judgement in your favour?

You say that a new front door was fitted and the money was taken out of your deposit – I would this be? Your landlord is not entitled to have the property back in the condition it was when he rented it out. He has to accept fair wear and tear.
It would be quite exceptional if you had to foot the bill for a new front door. You would have had to have damaged it substantially first of all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WWW.GOV.UK

Tenant's guide to deposit protection schemes - your deposit, information landlords must provide, disputes and advice
WWW.GOV.UK

Tenant's guide to deposit protection schemes - your deposit, information landlords must provide, disputes and advice

 

One question – very important – was your tenancy an assured short hold tenancy? Starting after April 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm also curious to know about the landlord.

At one point you talk about ownership by two brothers and separately as if you are talking about a completely separate person, you talk about the landlord.

Can you tell us exactly what the arrangement is. Who plays what role in this

And by the way, we will be asking you to give us the name of the landlord. This shouldn't worry you and in fact it will be used to make sure that the landlord knows that his behaviour is going to be attracting interest on the Internet.
This can only be a good thing. It will be helpful to you because it will put additional pressure. We hope that you will be able to resolve this without taking the court action

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Have you also contact the Local Council Private Renting Dept for the area that the property was and simply asked them if that Landlord is registered with them as this is now a legal requirement in the majority of the UK now that all Private Landlords renting properties are required to be registered with the relevant Local Council.

 

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...