Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pressured to work whilst off sick with Anxiety and depression


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2498 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

Since May 2017 my husband has been signed unfit for work by his doctor with all kinds of problems relating to anxiety and depression,

 

he is in the middle of a 8 week course of counselling which seems to have a positive effect and we felt he was on the road to recovery.

 

He has always been keen to return to work as quickly as possible and his doctor and counsellor agreed that if he wanted to return to work then they would agree to a phased return which his employer agreed to once an independent medical assessment had taken place and back to work meetings had been held with occupational health

 

that all changed on the evening of the 21st July when he received an email to his personal address from the UK HR Manager, the opening line in the email was

 

"Sorry to have to reach out to you regarding this but I need to you take urgent remedial action regarding your expenses". the expenses were all business related and I highlighted the fact that at they were outstanding to his HR in May which they ignored.

 

As much as I tried to tell him the reports can wait and he was still signed as unfit for work he was immediately anxious and wanted to get them done as the email stated that the whole region`s rebate would be withheld and that would effect peoples bonuses due in August,

 

that’s around 15 thousand people and I felt it was unfair to even mention that let alone ask him to push through 6 months’ worth of reports whilst no one is really sure on his condition until medical assessments have been done.

 

Now my husband often told me the IT systems were unreliable and caused frustrations but until I tried to help him do his expenses and mileage reports I had no idea how exhausting it was,

 

he had 6 months to catch up on and it took over a day from him to access all the systems etc as the passwords had all expired,

 

he got caught up in it all and was trying to call Pittsburgh on a Sunday evening to reset his passwords etc,

 

by this stage he was so caught up in it all it was pointless me telling him to stop so I decided the best thing for me to do would be to assist him where I could,

 

I was worried sick as I could see his whole attitude changed but was unable to talk sense to him and have him stop

 

, we eventually got onto the programmes needed (he works from home) and it then took a day and a half to complete the reports and submit them.

 

over the course of 4 days he completed the reports but he slipped back so far he wouldn’t eat couldn’t sleep

 

when he visited his counsellor that week I don’t think she could believe it and was disappointed as was I,

 

he has been with the company for 3 years and enjoys the role but I wonder now if they should have considered this more and personally I have lost confidence in them supporting him back into the work place correctly.

 

Is there any advice out there as there is no doubt that this has been a set back and I do not trust this company to make any adjustments or control his work load when/if he returns ,

 

if I could talk him into handing his notice in and moving on I would but he worries about money and finding another role and is also worried that they won’t want him back after the past few months.

 

Has anyone been in a similar situation or heard of this.

 

Thanks.Ann.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What has the employers Occupational health said about it?

 

There are many people here that can give exact advice, but the more specific infoyou can give, will enable them to give you the best advice.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The smart thing to do would be to ask the councellor to email the HR manager to advise of their concern that recent communications have caused your husband a set back in his current treatment, which might well delay a fit return to work. The HR Manager needs to understand that their conduct had consequences and this might well be the best way.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thanks, i will try to speak to his counsellor next week.

He has a medical examination next wednesday facilitated by OH, they dont know about the latest episode yet though.

Thanks again.

Ann

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mention Pittsburgh - which country are you in? Laws differ.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on the language used and they mention of UK HR, I assume this is the UK.

 

I can totally understand how upset you are, and of course you are going to want to take your husbands side in this. You should! But I don't think it's as clear cut as you think. Perhaps HR shouldn't have asked - although if there was nobody else to ask and these were historical details that only he could resolve, then I can understand why they did. And I might think that they did so only because he had been discussing a return to work, and perhaps didn't appreciate the problems that he would encounter? Did he not think to go back to HR and explain his frustrations and difficulties and ask for help? Or did he insist on soldiering on - which it sounds like he did, and may well be very telling in terms of how he had ended up in this place to start with?

 

It sounds to me like there are changes required on both sides here, and maybe those aren't being talked about. In which case, going back to work will simply land him back in this place. If the workload or the systems are too much to manage, then the employer perhaps needs to look at their resource. He perhaps needs more assistance, and the downside of being a home worker is that the stresses are not as easily seen as in an office, and there aren't other people to offload work to. But equally, he needs to stop - if he doesn't tell them what the difficulties are or what needs to be done, then he isn't helping himself; and if he has and nothing has happened, then he needs to make some hard decisions to protect himself. In the end, if the job is at the cost of his health, he needs to find another job.

 

But those are end of process considerations - first he needs to talk to OH about what happened and why it made him feel like this. And honestly - because if he is anything like a lot of men that I know, they'd rather lose their right arm than talk about "not coping"! It's easier to talk about physical injury than mental illness, and social pressure that associates being the breadwinner with succeeding at work makes them loathe to talk about not being able to manage work. That may be something you can help him with. Can you talk to OH with him? Would he feel that it is easier for you to make some of these observations than him? Or could you help him to frame his comments so that he's able to talk about these things himself? Because what you have described here, I understand your position in terms of HR having asked - but you then went on to describe almost a frenzy of "must do this" from him which is unhealthy. But very typical.

 

And on the positive side, you now have some very clear idea of how he works - which is immensely harmful. And that isn't about the employer, it's about the way he is. Especially when someone works from home where it's easy to get into a habit of being in the office 24/7. Advocates of home working often fail to appreciate that it takes great self discipline, or you never leave "the office". These are things that his employer can support him in, but only he can change them - and he'll probably need your help to do it. He needs to understand that it is not failure to tell his employer that their expectations are too high. And he needs to learn to walk away and switch off. If he is constantly sending the employer the message that he can cope with all the work and what they ask, then why would they think otherwise? When you have Superman, why would you ask for Clark Kent the geeky little weakling in the corner?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...