Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PDC - Property Debt Collection Claimform


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2170 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't what?

Of course you both have to exchange witness statements....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the claimant / PDC have failed to send directions, denied the defence was ever received and never bothered to try mediation and had to be reminddd about filing of the directions it wouldn’t surprise us if they failed to do disclose their statement/s either.

 

If they don’t then have you any ideas of how to address the constant failings at the hearing and put as much emphasis on discrediting their claim and legitimacy in relation to how they have handled their claim?

 

From reading the CPR, they are quite clear and are there for a reason. If we have to follow them then so should the claimant. So far they have completely ignored them.

 

Any thoughts or ideas on a tactical approach to discretionary them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some things in the CPR the parties MUST comply with or if a court has told either party..if its something they didnt do then get to the court and ask for it to be struck out.

 

But it sounds as if its just issues that can be discussed at the end when it comes to costs..we assume,e its on small track/.so wouldnt normally be costs but you can pipe up then and mention their failings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it is on small claims track.

 

The Court document specifically states that;

 

3.Parties shall file with the Court and serve on the other party copies of all documents upon which they intend to rely on no later than 14 days before the hearing.

 

4.Included in the copy documents shall be written statements of the witnesses (including the statements of the parties themselves)

 

5.The original documents shall be brought to the hearing.

 

That’s word for word on the “Notice of Allocation to the Small Claims Track (Hearing) document.

 

It also goes on about the judge thinking it is suitable again for mediation but they have ignored that. We were available for it last time.

 

So, going off what you suggest here, if they fail to do as instructed on the document we should be asking for it to be struck out as we have not seen their statements and documents upon which they rely? That would give them an unfair advantage.

 

We have discussed making an offer to cover the arrears but not their costs (which may have been offered had they taken mediation).

 

We have done everything right, mostly thanks to support here and lots of reading but the claimant appears to be able to ignore all the rules and the court appears to allow it.

 

The defence not being received yet being sent by us and the court (neither returned so deemed delivered, would be possible for one to go astray but two!!)

 

Failing to file directions and having to be reminded by the court;

 

It now appears that they won’t send the statements and documents on which they rely.

 

Just seems very one sided here. Sorry to be a nuisance but it helps to put things out in the open for others to put a different perspective on it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

" It now appears that they won’t send the statements and documents on which they rely."

 

How do you know that ? .......they have up till 14 days before the hearing to comply ?

 

If they dont then they have no evidence to rely on to support their claim.....

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that 14 working days or do weekends count as days?

 

Nothing from them so far. Is there a specific method of going for strike out in these circumstances? Eg; is there a template to be adapted / other examples that can give an indication of how one would go about this?

 

Cheers,

Edited by dx100uk
quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 calendar days.

 

You would need to pay £255 and draft an application to strike out, but with less than 14 days to go at that point you might be better off to just raise it with the Judge at the very start of the hearing.

Edited by dx100uk
quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

Gannymede;

 

Thank you. We will do just that if need be. Someone called my wife today from PDC Law (she missed the call but googled the number).

 

The witness statements and evidence we have sent is pretty conclusive and they received it today (Cuerden yesterday).

 

It may be totally coincidental but, they didn’t have her number so must have searched for it online, wouldn’t be difficult to find based on address as it’s published. We don’t know what they may have wanted but the next few days may be interesting, we’ll see if they try and communicate via post.

 

Hearing date is 1/06/18 so if it’s 14 calendar days then to be filed before then means by end of court day tomorrow.

 

It may be just a tad premature but given the call and them signing for the file from us today (which included the statements and all evidence we rely on) perhaps they may be willing to talk now which is something they have categorically refused to take part in.

 

I’ll post again in the next week, see what happens. Thanks for advice re the strike out, we’ll mention it at the time if need be.

Edited by dx100uk
quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

Today they have filed their witness statements and the evidence they rely on.

 

They are late and have waited until we sent ours first by the looks of it.

 

They have denied being invited to mediation (I forgot to add a copy of the appointment in the pack but we do have it from the end team). Just wonder if the court might accept it late given the claimants lateness.

 

I doubt we would get the court to act on the failure to file on time. They have left it a little late. CPR doesn’t seem to mean too much I guess.

 

End = med team (phone generated text).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Witness statements and their bundle arrived on Saturday 19th May.

 

However, a couple of days ago PDC sent through a "Consent Order" and have taken off all the costs, the admin fees charged by the claimant and have asked for the 7 years back payment of service charge to the sum of £1050.00.

 

They have added on the court fee of £115.00 which they have obviously paid to get it there and also asking for a £100.0 court fee for the order to be approved by the court. Total settlement figure of £1265.00.

 

We never had any issue with the payment of the charge, only would not pay it whilst in the wrong name and their ridiculous and what may actually be (but isn't proven as it's not been decided by a judge yet) illegal charges.

 

We are looking to accept the consent order and pay the money, mostly because I personally think that we have won and they have waited almost 8 years because of their idiocy.

 

Before we do, I'd be grateful to have someone elses thoughts on it but I think it is sensible and morally right to pay the arrears and their charge for the court (I did once tell them to take it there in anger but a long time before it got there).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...