Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Under disciplinary for alleged working while off sick - please help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2556 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

My partner his off sick from work. A few months ago we started a new business together for when she is finally sacked/leaves etc. She is joint Director and shareholder like me. We have not even done any work yet, all we have done is put money into the business. No wage has been taken out, no dividend taken out, no money at all has come out of our business bank account.

The fire service who employs her says you must have permission for another job but nothing about being a director of a company, especially a dormant one.

She has had lots of problems at work and put a grievance in finally 2 weeks ago then alas this disciplinary letter turns up saying she works for this company. However she doesnt she owns it with me. They now want to see her asap. Should she take copies of all accounts, share certificates, bank statements etc to prove no wage has ever been drawn. I am also a witness.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not about wage. Its about having another job. Which she does. She could never take a penny fromt he business, despite being a director. She'd still be employed by it though.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its not about wage. Its about having another job. Which she does. She could never take a penny fromt he business, despite being a director. She'd still be employed by it though.

 

In law a director is an 'office holder', not an employee.

 

https://www.gov.uk/employment-status/director

https://www.gov.uk/employment-status/office-holder

 

Some directors are employee's, though ; if they hold a service contract. Many executive directors (rather than non-exec's) do this, as it gives them the right to salary for their exec. jobs, as well as more security (a director can be removed without regard to if a removal is 'fair', and they can't claim unfair dismissal, but can do so for the "employment" part of a service contract!)

 

However she may be perceived as being an employee (and to some extent her current employer's perception matters), and if she says that she "isn't doing any work for the company", her current employer might point to the fact that as a director she has duties and responsibilities, merely by being a director ..... it depends on the exact phrasing of her current contract as to what she is or isn't permitted to do ('employment' v. 'work' v. 'job'), as well as if her being fit to perform the duties of a director appears to conflict with her being unfit for her current job ......

 

Is she a member of the FBU / another union?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they own the company and they created it. Theyre an employee.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

My partner his off sick from work. A few months ago we started a new business together for when she is finally sacked/leaves etc. She is joint Director and shareholder like me. We have not even done any work yet, all we have done is put money into the business. No wage has been taken out, no dividend taken out, no money at all has come out of our business bank account.

The fire service who employs her says you must have permission for another job but nothing about being a director of a company, especially a dormant one.

She has had lots of problems at work and put a grievance in finally 2 weeks ago then alas this disciplinary letter turns up saying she works for this company. However she doesnt she owns it with me. They now want to see her asap. Should she take copies of all accounts, share certificates, bank statements etc to prove no wage has ever been drawn. I am also a witness.

Thanks

 

She should take every evidence she could

 

Great if you could give a Witness Statement.

 

Best if it is a sworn statement

 

I'm in agreement with BazzaS on director/employee

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they own the company and they created it. Theyre an employee.

 

I disagree.

 

They are a director. They are a shareholder.

I agree they "created it", but none of these make them an employee.

What makes them an employee? None of the above mandate it.

 

Where is their employment contract? (although I accept a contract doesn't have to be written). If neither they nor the company intend them to be an employee, how is the contract formed (lack of all of offer, acceptance, consideration and intent to form legal relationship)

 

 

If an employee, why aren't they receiving National Minimum Wage?.

Do they meet (m)any of the factors listed at

https://www.gov.uk/employment-status/employee

under "Someone who works for a business is probably an employee if most of the following are true:" .....?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all

the contract states she is not permitted to take other paid employment with out first informing her employers ( fire service). She has not been paid nor is employed

 

She has been of sick with stress from bullying and change of job role ( she is disabled) since Nov 2015. Since February 20106 she has tried to return to work with adaptions put in place but they are unable to put the necessary adaptions in place so she was penciled in for sickness retirement/ill health. In that time her job role has changed significantly ( without consultation) to the the point she is unable to do the job at all. We were waiting on a 3 month pay-off/walk away last September. then it went quiet, we heard nothing, we kept going to meetings but they just went backwards and covered old ground. they told my partner to keep being signed off sick, her sick pay has now ended so she is still employed by the fire service but not being paid,

She has met with the service doctor 3 times in 12 months and he has agreed medical discharge with retirement etc so we are waiting on that.

 

Totally legit when setting up a new business with me - expected to be left work and free to be able to do what we wanted.

Now, its gone on silly amount of time so a grievance went in and then this happens.

 

They are just trying to get out of paying the 3 months statutory notice pay for medical discharge and wait for her to resign.

She has been with Unison all through this and they are useless

What are we supposed to do now they have stopped her pay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thwe stopping of the pay is down to the terms of the sickness pay part of her employment scheme and nothing to do with the disciplinary investigation.

so, either claim SSP or get a fit note and turn up for work and ask about the adjustments and force them to make a decision. At present the employer is just wasting time but doing nothing wrong

Link to post
Share on other sites

thwe stopping of the pay is down to the terms of the sickness pay part of her employment scheme and nothing to do with the disciplinary investigation.

so, either claim SSP or get a fit note and turn up for work and ask about the adjustments and force them to make a decision. At present the employer is just wasting time but doing nothing wrong

 

Thanks, were ok with the money being stopped, we understand that is part of the sickness policy and not bothered about it, our complaint is the time wasting and the fact been pulled up for opening a business that she is dormant in

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...