Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • dx is wrong there. The reason they did the application with a hearing is likely that they had questions of the application that weren't answered in their wx. nothing to do with your N180 no they are just saying that they want the extension to make it 7.
    • its not a fine! it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge dx
    • Agreed, though I do think you should change your avatar to that anyway as most of your posting comes from that region anyway 🤣 At least it will liven up my interest in what must be the two most boring candidates for PM that I can ever remember 
    • I already phoned them.  It was for a parking fine submitted by CP Plus issued by solicitors DCB in 2022!  I'll ring again tomorrow and do as you said 😇 Hard to believe such a harmful thing as a CCJ can be issued when there's no proof of anything!!!
    • Apologies but this is the only info I have received through the post. I have not received any other PCN notification
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowells Claimform - old Doorstep Provi loan - Submitting defence on the last day


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2450 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, first post.

Just got a little question about CCJ defense response times.

 

I filed my defence today (Sunday) online.

 

Today is the last day I have for filing the defence.

I should not of left it till the last day but I was waiting for a response from the claimant which only came the previous day.

 

I had 33 days from the day of service in total to file my defence.

My defence will not be processed by the court until tomorrow which will be the 34th day after the day or service.

 

So my question is

does the defence have to be processed by the court within the time you have to file a defence (in my case 33 days after DOS)

or is it that as long as you have uploaded it before the time runs out you are safe?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as you submit it before the deadline, youre ok.

 

can i ask if youre able to provide more details on the case?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as you submit it before the deadline – or before the claimant makes an application for judgement. Whichever is the later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as you submit it before the deadline, youre ok.

 

can i ask if youre able to provide more details on the case?

 

A CCJ claim was made against me by Lowell for a supposed 5 year old Provident loan.

 

 

I have requested a copy of the original signed credit agreement.

 

 

They responded by saying they are waiting for Provident to send them the documentation so they have put the account on hold which is kinda pointless really because I only had 1 day to file a defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then use the no paperwork holding defence. That needs to be your defence.

 

They may put it on hold internally, but theyre trying to get you to not complete the court paperwork, so they get a judgement by default, then start with bailiffs etc. It's their standard operating trick.

 

Look around on this site for the no paperwork holding defence, and youll be set.

 

The reason they left it so long is to try and get the court timeframe to expire, then youd have been screwed.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

what date is on the top right of the claimform?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

21st March. Day of service is 5 days from that date.

 

Sorry I made a mistake on the original post.

I meant to say 33 days after the date on the letter not day of service.

 

I didn't know about the holding defence on this website

I have already filed the defence stating that I do not owe them any money and that I have made a request for documentation pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules (Part 31.14) but they have failed to provide the signed credit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

was this a doorstepper loan?

and was this the ONLY loan you had or were there a chain before this

 

your defence was due Friday by 4pm [the claimform date is ONE in the count]

and if day 33 falls on a w/end you must file by the last weekday as the court closes at 4pm so it will be counted as Monday for you

but that's no bother LiP's [litigants in person are allowed lee-way].

 

so you've NOT filed that defence yet on MCOL I hope?

 

stay with me easy to sort this properly

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The defence was filed earlier today.

There was 1 maybe 2 doorstep loans I had from provident before this that were paid off in full.

 

I presumed that it had to be done by Friday and tried to file it on Friday

but I had issues logging in to MoneyClaimOnline

I rang the court up and they told me to email it them.

 

 

They also told me the last day is Monday

but I didn't really trust the math of the guy I spoke to so filed it today through MoneyClaimOnline.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what defence did you give?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just stated that I don't Lowell or Provident any money and that I have asked for a copy of the signed credit agreement on two occasion (one in 2014 and one recently) but they have not been sent. It was more elaborate than that but that's the gist of it.

 

Was there something I should of put?

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you copy and paste your defence exactly as filed please by email

 

go up on mcol and see if you can get in if you can

then we'll give you the correct defence to file.

 

you did send the claimant a CCa request didn't you?

as the CPR is only a request that they don't HAVe to even comply with

 

were the previous loans totally paid off or do you mean your last loan settled the one before it?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that I do not owe any money to Lowell or the original creditor

 

In December 2014 Lowell was sent a letter asking for a copy of the credit agreement which bears my signature.

I did not receive any such document.

 

At the beginning of April 2017 another letter was sent to Lowell asking for a copy of the credit agreement which bears my signature.

 

Lowell have replied stating that the account is now on hold as they await for the Original creditor to respond.

 

The request is pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules (Part 31.14) and therefore unsigned copy will not suffice, only a copy of the original contract in its unaltered form will suffice in these circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

you did send the claimant a CCa request didn't you?

as the CPR is only a request that they don't HAVe to even comply with

 

dx

 

No I dont think I did send a CCA.

 

 

The reason being is I did some reading up about it at the time and some forum somewhere mentioned that CCA is no good because it asks for a "True" copy of the credit agreement which does not have to be a copy of the original signed credit agreement.

CPR.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

crap website then. yo ALWAYS send a CCA request when the Particulars of claim mention the Consumer credit Act.

 

a CPR can be ignored

and as this was a doorstepper loan

you should also request in the CPR copy of the relevant pages of the Doorsteppers accounts notebook

they'll NEVER produce those as they are usually fiddled to allow the agent to avoid tax and hide the commission they were making on the side.

 

can you go and see if you can login to mcol please

 

I've made you CPR a hidden file that only siteteam and you can see it as templates should be in the public forum.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you emailed the defence it cant be showing on mcol surely?

 

 

hang on

i'll find you one.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

click respond to a claim

make sure [AOS} is shown and done

then you select the file defence box

 

 

2 mins

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I filed the defense on MCOL. I did not send the email because I managed to login today. MCOL must of had some network issues on Friday.

 

Unless there is something I am missing I will not be able to edit my defense on MCOL.

The only thing I can do now is email them another defence as an extension of what is already filed on MCOL and make out I needed more space than what MCOL's 400 or so characters provide.

 

Also, to answer your question previously yes the previous loans were paid off in full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so theres nowhere that indicates you can edit it

I don't think there is but check.

 

if not don't worry

 

all you do is this:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?474636-Lowell-claimform-old-provident-Doorstep-LOan-debt-no.2.

 

look at post 1 in the above thread

CHECK that the particulars of YOUR CLAIMFORM

are the same as post 1 [bar your personal stuff.!!]

 

if they are

 

then pop to post 23 in that thread and use that defence

you DONT post the red bit

and remember to change dates etc to mimic your CPR dates etc

 

ADAPT the CCA request line to read

 

A CCA REquest has now been sent also ,due to it not being sent following a clerical error

 

then...

 

email it to this email address.

 

MCOL is only one way of responding to a claim.

.

If you are having problems logging in, or would prefer not to use MCOL,

you can fax, email or post your response to the Court instead.

If you send your response by e mail

please send it to [email protected] and ensure you quote “Claim response” and quote the claim number in the subject field.

 

in the first line of the email

tell them that this defence is to over ride and replace the one filed on MCOL as that was filed by mistake

 

should be well ok

and we've done this before

 

HTH

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok great

 

 

when you are settled

I posted a link in post 17

 

 

no harm in you reading as many of those threads in that link as possible

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...