Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Livery yard tenancy agreement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3071 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Three years ago my friend and I entered into a Tenancy Agreement which was agreed by both parties for a livery yard for personal use and grazing. July this year the property was sold and new landlord says it is not valid as it was not signed. We know that this is not the case but he is now stating that it was a verbal agreement only. Which is not true and have emails with previous landlord to dispute this. The previous landlords are denying the existence of the agreement because they were desperate to move and have really dropped us in it. The new landlord has asked us to move and has given me to the end of January 2016 despite the fact that we still have 2 years left on the agreement. We will go as we do not want to stay now but we invested a lot of money into the property hoping to reap the benefits of this in the last 2 years - which we wont see now. Also he has now threatened us with immediate notice - where do we stand? Also where do we stand financially?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to CAG. I expect the forum guys will be along with advice for you later.

 

In case it helps them, do you have copies of the paperwork? Was there anything signed and on paper?

 

My best, HB

 

I have copies of all paperwork. Nothing signed on the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How did you pay the rent? can you produce evidence of regular payments to the landlord that corresponds with the amount on the (Unsigned) Paperwork?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We paid the rent by standing order on the first of each month never missed a payment and when the new landlord took over we paid him cash and got a receipt for the first month and subsequently paid by standing order. We have paid full amount despite the fact that we have not had full use of the property for 6 weeks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter that you have an unsigned written agreement..it's obvious, though that there was a contract and that you have kept to your part. Perhaps you can claim breach of contract? TB

Edited by ThedaBara
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the fact that you have made payments which have been accepted by the other party means that both parties have entered into a contractual relationship, and whether the contract is signed or not, the written terms would still be legally binding… but I'm not an expert… I am sure there will be someone on here who knows about such things. Good luck! TB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that was what we thought. I will have to seek legal advice as the situation is getting nasty. I even think he is trying to stop me attending to my horses which I know he can't do. So unnecessary, but not easy relocating 10 horses overnight! Thanks for all your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the written agreement and the history of payments matching the agreement, signed or unsigned, I feel you have a good case as on the balance of probabilities that contract exists and as the terms appear to match the written agreement it would be found to be that agreement.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the written agreement and the history of payments matching the agreement, signed or unsigned, I feel you have a good case as on the balance of probabilities that contract exists and as the terms appear to match the written agreement it would be found to be that agreement.

 

Thank you. Big showdown with them today so will find out what their demands are later on!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is important here to also state that you need to keep that papertrail as active as you can

 

Make sure your showdown is also delivered in the form of recorded delivery letter for which you retain a copy off, plus a copy of proof of delivery and postage

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is important here to also state that you need to keep that papertrail as active as you can

 

Make sure your showdown is also delivered in the form of recorded delivery letter for which you retain a copy off, plus a copy of proof of delivery and postage

 

Yes good point! We have had a letter from them asking us to leave by end of January 2016 but other communications have been verbal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the original agreement doesnt need to be signed as there was a "meeting of minds" as the courts like to say. This is clear by the paperwork and the payment made o for a year. The new LL is hoping that you will be bamboozled by their claims or they are just ignorant of the law and somehow think they are right because they wish it so.

You may well end up in court if they do try and evict you but it may be that you have to start the proceedings for a breach of contract. They will have been assigned the contractual terms by their purchase.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It needs to stop being verbal communications now.

 

As you clearly have a contract, the breach of contract route is a good one

 

Any costs incurred moving could in theory be claimed and maybe that should be your final letter to him

 

A Letter before action

Stating that you can prove the existence of the contract

That requesting you to leave is a breach of contract

that if he still intends to breach the agreement then the costs of having to relocate will be borne by him and you will take action in the county court to recuperate those losses.

 

That is my view from a simple contract perspective

 

HOWEVER

 

The change in land ownership does complicate things and may have ramifications from outside my area,

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the original agreement doesnt need to be signed as there was a "meeting of minds" as the courts like to say. This is clear by the paperwork and the payment made o for a year. The new LL is hoping that you will be bamboozled by their claims or they are just ignorant of the law and somehow think they are right because they wish it so.

You may well end up in court if they do try and evict you but it may be that you have to start the proceedings for a breach of contract. They will have been assigned the contractual terms by their purchase.

 

A meeting of minds and also with the history of payments that can be proved matching the terms on the contract (Albeit unsigned) intent to create legal relations :)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A meeting of minds and also with the history of payments that can be proved matching the terms on the contract (Albeit unsigned) intent to create legal relations :)

 

Wow, this is fantastic information. Many, many thanks. I do feel somewhat comforted knowing he can't just boot us off. Yes it will cost us a lot to move all 10 horses, did not consider claiming that back. But I really appreciate the guidance from you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/agricultural-tenancies

 

This may be a useful source of info given to me by another member of the site team

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...