Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

POPLA Appeal Declined - Premier Park - What now?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3084 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I wonder if anyone could help.

 

 

I had been parking at a Premier Park in Southampton from time to time during the summer whilst on a residential course.

Unfortunately my car failed the MOT durng this time and I borrowed a car from a relative.

 

 

The first time I parked this car in the car park I received a ticket as I mistakenly entered the reg number of my old car

(you needed to enter the reg number into the machine when buying the ticket).

 

 

I appealed to Premier explaining the circumstances

(it happened on the day of my final exam when I was also packing up to leave my accommodation and I think I must have been distracted,

I paid for parking and provided the ticket etc) but was declined,

 

 

I then appealed to POPLA who also declined my appeal.

I have now received a £100 demand from Premier with a threat to pass to their solicitors.

 

I'd apprecite advice on whether I should just pay up or are there any further avenues I can explore.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

What did you say in your popla appeal.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

that I paid (enclosed the ticket) but that I put in wrong reg (they have photos)

that this was an error, exact wording

 

 

"You will see that the ticket bears the registration xxx as unfortunately I inadvertently typed in the registration of my usual car,

instead of the xxx that I was actually driving that day.

 

 

xxxx was my usual car which I had had for a number of years and had parked at xxxx several times over the last few months.

Unfortunately the car had to be taken off the road and disposed of following an MOT failure the previous week

and I had borrowed xxx, my relative's car.

 

 

At the time I paid for parking I had just finished a stressful all-day examination at the end of a residential course

and was packing up the car to leave xxxx for the final time to return home.

 

 

I can only think that I was distracted and stressed at the time and that this is the reason why I entered the wrong registration number. "

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

As POPLA has denied your appeal, the only way Premier will be able to chase you is via the courts but they don't do much on that score.

 

If they did choose the court route, they have as much chance as you and they won't get back as much as it costs them to take court action.

 

Any letters sent can be ignored or a simple letter back saying 'see you in court'

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

IF however you receive a N1 claim form, come back to us. BUT that is very very unlikely

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In contract law they parking co have to prove your action is a breach of contract that has caused them a loss and as you paid then no loss has been caused. This is already decided by appeals elsewhere and premier cannor claim that the law is different because they wish it so. You should never send the ticket back to the parking co but just refer to the ticket number or photocopy it. Should they sue you how are you going to prove you paid? Everything else you mention about what you were doing there is irrelevent and if you used that as the basis of your appeal then POPLA may well have missed the vital parts that would have defeated the claim.

If Premier Park contact you again demand the return of your ticket as it is your property and only loaned to them for the purpose of proving that you had paid and give it a nominal value of £100, which you will seek to recover from them if it is not returned. They would be on very weak ground if they did decide to use the courts to chase you for the debt and they know it so you are most likely to receive letters from one of the dca's the parking indusrty use such as Debt Recovery Plus and ZZPS. You can ignore anything they say with impunity as they are just hired to write letters and have no interest in the matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for taking the time to send me replies, it is much appreciated.

 

Although I sent the ticket back I hve retained clear scans of both sides that I sent to POPLA with my appeal. I will ask Premier Park to return my ticket.

 

Would it be worth reappealing to POPLA emphasising that I paid and PP have suffered no loss or is a further appeal not allowed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

DOnt think its possible to re-appeal. One appeal is all you get, but the result isnt binding on you anyway. Just on the PPC. Thats why many PPC's go to the other group.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Hi all

 

I've just received a letter from Premier Park headed "notice of intended legal action - supreme court decison" referring me to the Beavis decision stating that if I o not pay up they will commence court action. Any thoughts on next steps?

 

Refer them to Pressdram vs Arkell....

 

http://www.lettersofnote.com/2013/08/arkell-v-pressdram.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the letter say 'WILL' or is it worded to confuse you into thinking they will.

 

They may be trying their luck on the back of the Beavis case. As it is, you paid for parking so there was no loss as such. Just the confusion caused to them in finding out who paid and who didn't.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...