Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon,    I am writing in reference to the retail dispute number ****, between myself and Newton Autos concerning the sale of a Toyota Avensis which has been found to have serious mechanical faults.    As explained previously the car was found to be faulty just six days after purchase. The car had numerous fault codes that appeared on the dash board and went into limp mode. This required assistance from the AA and this evidence has already been provided. The car continues to exhibit these faults and has been diagnosed as having faults with the fuel injectors which will require major mechanical investigation and repairs.    Newton Autos did not make me aware of any faults upon purchase of the vehicle and sold it as being in good condition.    Newton Autos have also refused to honour their responsibilities under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 which requires them to refund the customer if the goods are found to be faulty and not fit for purpose within 30 days of purchase.    Newton Autos also refused to accept my rejection of the vehicle and refused to refund the car and accept the return of the vehicle.    It is clear to me that the car is not fit for purpose as these mechanical faults occurred so soon after purchase and have been shown to be present by both the AA and an independent mechanic.   Kind regards
    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do mediation and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out     .
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Backdoor CCJ Howdens Joinery B2B debt - Equita hceo at my door


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3144 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I was running my own limited company when it fell on bad times and I ceased trading in January 2015.

 

 

I only had one creditor which was Howdens Joinery for about 2k.

 

 

Today my wife opened the door to a HCEO from Equita asking to speak to me regarding a business debt that I am liable for.

 

My wife explained to him that I no longer trade and that the registered business address was not my home address

and also that I had sent a request to companies house to close the business down.

 

I have no business assets and no business premises.

He left a letter with my wife addressed to the company

but with my home address on it

advising that they will return in 7 days if I do not contact them to discuss and pay the debt.

 

Again, there are no business assets at my home and my car is registered in my name.

 

Can he remove goods from my home or take my car?

 

Would be grateful if anyone could assist as I want to call the back but need some feedback.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

simple ans is no he cannot.

and he has no right of entry either.

were you notified that this was going to court?

get the claimform?

get the resultant CCJ?

moved to the bailiffs forum

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being a LTD company there is no personal liability unlike a sole trader, only on company assets

 

A limited company is a completely separate entity from its owners. Everything from the company bank account, to ownership of assets and involvement in tenders and contracts is purely company business and separate from the interests of the company’s shareholders.

 

You are protected in case things go wrong. Assuming no fraud has taken place, you will not be personally liable for any financial losses made by your limited company.

 

They can make you Bankrupt though, the limit i believe has been raised from £750 to £5000.000 from next month

 

But only if you have offered a personal Guarantee with the Joinery provider

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?439688-Bankruptcy-threshold-increased-from-£750.00-to-£5-000.00

 

Yes, BR threshold increased from £750.00 to £5,000 from next month, October 2015.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Until you get confirmation from Equita that they are no longer persuing you for the companies debt,

it might be wise to park your car a couple of streets away, and keep the external doors in your house locked so he cannot walk in

- it is not unknown in these circumstances for them to "seize first" and try and bully you into paying the debt, despite not owing it.

 

I would also suggest sending a letter and maybe phoning the Company the money is owed to,

stating the company was Limited and is no longer in business, and you will take legal action against them, should a Bailiff take your car, enter the house etc, as the Bailiff is acting under their instructions, they are equally liable for anything the Bailiff does.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all.

Bailiff HCEO turned up today when I was not there and just walked in past my wife.

Luckily the kids were upstairs at the time.

He said he was going to seize goods unless she can prove they are not the company's assets.

My wife told him to get out and that this is a residential address and nothing to with the business.

He left and sat in the car outside.

I spoke to him as he gave my wife his number.

He has asked me to prove that the items in the house are not the business and also to prove I am not trading.

I told him that the business premises was closed in January and there are no assets or bank account which there isn't.

He said that the company still shows as active online.

Said to him that it takes about 6 months to close.

Can he come back and take my goods from the house or enter the house at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think you will find he is trying to up the ante. He has not taken control of anything and he will know fine well your household goods are just that & the majority of those are exempt anyway. You really do need to keep your doors locked at all times until this is resolved.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. My car has been outside the house both times and he has not levied against this or clamped it or even threatened to take the car. The car is in my name only as well as my van. Is there anything I can print out to show him that he cannot just chase the debt at my home address or threaten to take goods or even just walk in the door. I also have 2 disabled children at home.

 

thanks again for all your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not being nosy but could you say in general terms what your children have & is it likely to be aggravated by unnecessary callers. The chances are he may only call another couple of times before giving it up as a lost cause - he only gets paid on results and just adding charges for now puts nothing in his pocket. Howdens can of course instruct another HCEO or go for a different action but they need to learn that if the Ltd Co had or has no assets then they will get nothing - they can of course use it as a tax write off.

 

As for him attending then unfortunately the Writ gives him the right to attend any address in England or Wales where he believes there might be goods that will satisfy the debt. Of course if he is wrong then he may leave himself to action against himself.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

My 2 eldest children are autistic and do not like people who they do not know visiting our home.

I understand that an HCEO can visit any address but there is only our personal property here and no company assets so can he take them and do I have to prove they are ours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem that the bailiff has is that the debt is in the name of a Limited Company and if he attempts to take goods, he needs to have a good belief that they actually BELONG to the Limited Company.

 

If you had traded as a sole trader then the position would have been far simpler for the bailiff and I would have expected him to attempt to remove your vehicles. I assume that both the car and van are in your name as opposed to the name of the Limited Company.

 

My personal opinion is that the bailiff will very likely return the writ although he may make one more visit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Hi. My 2 eldest children are autistic and do not like people who they do not know visiting our home.

 

 

I would make both Claimant & HCEO aware of your sons condition & that you will hold them both fully responsible for any breakdown in your sons condition(s). I would also take the opportunity to say that as the Ltd Co has ceased trading & is awaiting Strike Off by Companies there are no assets kept at your residential address & unless they can provide a current signed personal guarantee then they should refrain from visiting.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

One possibility to help protect yourself is to go to your local court, or a solicitors and get a Notorised "Statutory Declaration"

 

I am not sure if a "global" list is allowed, so you may need to list all the "assets" that the HCEO could levy, TV, computers/laptops, game systems and so on. The Stat Dec as long as it has been witnessed/stamped by a Solicitor or someone at the Court (Should only cost between £5-£10 or so) is a valid legal document of ownership, and would state all the goods belong to you and your wife, not the Limited Company.

 

The HCEO may not like it, but they are legal, and have the same effect as a Receipt, more so really, since a Receipt from a till when buying a TV or coffee table won't have the purchasers name on it, and a person could easily "borrow" an old receipt from a friend to outwit the levy, whilst a Stat Dec is a legal document (and lying on one if proven to be a false statement would be Perjury/Contempt of Court, so it is a serious tool, and a Bailiff would be mental to still attempt a levy or seizure when presented with one, unless he had genuine evidence or suspicions that its a false declaration but would I think have to take you to Court to argue the validity before the judge, which could I suspect be costly for the Bailiff or his firm if the statement is proven Truthful, so its not something they would be keen to mess with, I should think. (most people don't keep or will have lost receipts for home goods, which is why Bailiff's like to demand them as they know people tend not to have them.

 

Getting one done should only take a few minutes at court/solicitors, and you would of course list your car and van on it, then make several copies, then, by recorded delivery so you have proof of service, write a letter stating that this is a Stat Dec to prove that the goods are personally owned by you and your wife, no company assets are at the address, which is residential, no goods at the residential address belong to the Limited Company,, remind them again that the Limited Company is no longer trading, and that as they well know, you are not personally liable for the Companies Debts as it was a limited company. then post the letter and the stat dec 1 to the Enforcement Company, and 1 to the Creditor, perhaps even post a copy of both to the Head of Enforcement at the Court the Warrant is from, stating that you are being harassed by a HCEO who is pursuing you for a debt you do not owe, as it belongs to a Limited Company that is no longer in business, and you have attached the Notorised Stat Dec as proof all the goods in the home are personally owned, nothing in the property belongs to the LTD Company. If you have any paperwork showing the Ltd Company has ceased trading, including emails etc (print them out) then put that in the letters too. Ask him/herfor help in getting the HCEO called off, as he is harassing you for a debt you don't owe. In the letters to the Creditor & Enforcement Company, you could again point out that you have now provided enough proof that Enforcement attempts should be stopped, and you may take legal action if the HCEO continues to harass you and your family, and of course, that the Creditor is equally legally responsible for any wrongs committed by the HCEO acting under their instructions, and thus any future legal action should harassment continue would include them. Demand written acceptance that Enforcement has been halted against you and your address.

 

Until you have confirmation that Enforcement has been halted against you and your address, I would strongly Recommend that you park your car and van away from your address, if you can, on private land, a pub car park with Landlords permission, or the drive of friends or family members, as they cannot clamp/remove vehicles that are on private land not owned by you. It is much easier and safer to do this, than wake up, or come home from the shops and find that he has seized and removed them whilst he considers the Warrant Live and Actionable at your address, and then having to go through various legal procedures to get them back (and hope they haven't been sold quickly, which does happen)

 

This link has a little bit of info about Stat Dec's though it does not point out they can be done at a solicitors, unless the law has changed recently.

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/debt-and-money/action-your-creditor-can-take/bailiffs/your-belongings-and-bailiffs/what-goods-can-a-bailiff-take/proving-who-owns-the-items-bailiffs/

 

When a Bailiff is able to make peaceful entry into your home, he Levies your goods, by listing them, for example 1 x 42" Panasonic Television, Serial Number XXXXXXX 1 x Acer Laptop Serial No xxxxxxx 20 x assorted Xbox Video Games 1 x Xbox One Serial No xxxxx your Stat Dec would be similar to that, listing the "assets" as belonging to you, not the Company. You would list your Car and Van on it too.

 

This Link is an example of what a Stat Dec would look like

http://www.consumerwiki.co.uk/index.php/Bailiffs:_Useful_Template_Letters#Statutory_Declaration_For_Goods_Belonging_to_Someone_Else

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Backdoor CCJ Howdens Joinery B2B debt - Equita hceo at my door
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...