Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wow thats incredible. Thank you so much
    • If the purchaser denies having received it then sue P2G. If you simply don't hear anything more from the purchaser then you have the purchaser's name and address – and frankly for £48 I would go ahead and sue. As long as you have good proof of delivery then your chances of success are probably better than 95% and frankly the purchaser would probably put their hands up as they would effectively be being sued for the civil equivalent of theft. I wouldn't let it go if I were you. It would be a good exercise for you and gives you confidence the next time something comes up which is may be much more valuable
    • Thank you again Emmzzi for your insight. Not only did I do the work, but as a maths tutor delivering financial literacy workshops under the Govt Multiply project, the college were paid £400 for each student I recruited, which makes it an even bigger kick in the teeth! I spoke to Citizens Advice Bureau on Friday who advised me to go back to ACAS for advice and assistance, as ACAS are the experts in employment matters. They did also mention small claims court, as being more straightforward and less complex, but surely their solicitor would just contest this and I would lose the £80 court fee? If I did submit a claim through the small claims court, would I just leave the employment tribunal running until the outcome? The deadline for me to submit my schedule of loss is tomorrow, so I will submit today so that they cannot hold me in breach.
    • Ive just checked the tracking again and its actually out for delivery today! Anyway,  I refunded the buyer on Ebay off my own back on the 2nd of June they havent opened a case or anything like that so surely i cant take action against either the buyer or P2G/ Evri can i ? Id hope the buyer would see fit and pay but you know what people are like these days ... Once its delivered I'll send him a polite message asking for payment but i suspect there'll be no reply      
    • Thanks for this update. Let's not if you have any more difficulty – in particular if you have difficulty getting paid back from the purchaser. We can help you either against the parcel delivery courier or against the purchaser
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell/carter claimform - old Vanquis 'debt'***Claim Struck Out***


syphor
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3000 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

Just quick update on this,

 

 

I have received nothing from Lowell and only the letter posted previously by Carter.

 

 

So from what I can establish from reading other threads it's time to prepare my defence.

Would it be better to submit this right on the end date or sooner?

 

Also I am not sure if it matters but when looking on my Noddle report the account number is different from the one quoted on here.

 

Thanks for all your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi folks,

 

I have put this together editing previous defences from the site. Can you let you know what you think please.

 

POC

 

1.the claimants claim is for the sum of 1869.27 being monies due from the defendant to the claimant

under an agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 between the defendant and vanquis under account reference xxxxxxx

and assigned to the claimant on 05/09/2014, notice of which has been given to the defendant.

 

2.the defendant failed to maintain contractual repayment under the terms of the agreement

and a default notice has not been complied with.

 

and the claimant claims 1897.27

 

the claimant also claims statutory interest pursuant to s.69 of the county act 1984

at a rate of 8% per annum from the date o assignment of the agreement to date

but limited to a maximum of one year and a maximum of 1000 amounting to 145.44

 

Defence

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is denied with regards to an amount due under an agreement.The Claimant/Solicitor has failed to disclose any agreement/s or statements on which its claim relies upon. I am unaware of any legal assignment the claimant refers to within its particulars and deny any Notice was served pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925.

 

3. Paragraph 2 is denied with regards to the Claimant serving a default notice in connection with the alleged contractual Agreement.

 

On receipt of this claim I requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CPR 31.14. I have received a letter acknowledging my request. To date I have yet to receive the documentation requested. This was posted on the 01.09.2015.

 

I also requested a copy of the agreement that this claim relies upon by way of a Section 78 request. I have received a letter acknowledging my request. To date they have failed to supply the documents and remain in default. This was posted on the 01.09.2015.

 

Therefore with the courts permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a)Show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement(s); and

(b) Show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount(s) claimed for;

© Show how the agreement(s) were breached/ terminated to allow the claimant relief.

(d) Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

4. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5, it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

5. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act1974.

 

6. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post #42 Syphor.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would allow a little more time,in case they respond to your CCA request......but you could submit it next weekend (Friday 25th)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

why via email?

 

 

you should be using MCOL website

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well done

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi guys,

 

yesterday I received the standard from letter for Carter inviting me into negotiations, telling me the court advises you too and I should seek legal advice.

 

Am I correct that I need to reply to this reiterate the previous letters that they have not responded to as per my defence?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

No - just another churned out please give us some money, see other threads same old system of deluge of letters during claim, see what he sends next. if he has not as in most cases not supplied documents etc then he is on a hiding and knows it.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

You agree to mediation and to Small Claims Track... the rest is pretty much self explanatory

 

Standard procedure

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

Today i have received 2 separate letters:-

 

1 - is a copy of the small claims track questionnaire completed by Carter (agreeing to mediation), does this mean that when I complete mine I need to send him a copy?

 

2 - a reply to my defence which states the account number, date of default and when it was assigned to Lowell and states I would have received notice of assignment around that time. It also refers me to my own records for a copy of the agreement. It then goes on to say that they are going proceeding with the claim and are willing to enter in negations under the tomlim act and invite me to call their office.

 

So basically they haven't provided anything, however am I best contacting them as the court will see this favourably?

 

Thanks again, Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

2. is a std response if you read other carter threads

safe to ignore

 

 

1. yes him and court

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

you'll prob get a call from the mediation team

explain you have received no paperwork from carter at all

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi guys, just a quick update.

 

 

I have had the mediation call where I explained I had no paperwork.

 

 

Now it has been considered by a judge and allocated to small claims court.

 

 

It is asking me to pay £170,

 

 

what's my best option here?

 

 

Is this normal?

 

Thanks for your help as ever.

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...