Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Link Parking management 'Fine',now claimform - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3167 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I bought a £3 all day parking ticket for a Link Parking maintained carpark.

 

 

The ticket moved when I closed the door and flipped up side down displaying the blank side (back of the ticket).

 

 

I received a fine for this (£60 now or £100 if left).

 

 

I followed their appeals procedure and was rejected,

 

 

I appealed to IPC who sympathised but also rejected.

 

 

Is there anything else I can do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you can ignore their demands for money from you.

 

As you paid the prescribed fee and displayed your ticket you have adhered to the terms of the contract.

Anything else they say about illegible tickets etc is all nonsense and the truth is that they are using the flimsiest of excuses to try and gte money from you when it isnt due.

 

If they send you a LBA then come back here and we will offer an aoutling of a defence against their claim.

 

 

Saying anything else will be wasted time until that tyime so forget about them.

 

 

If you get a letter from a DCA ignore them as well, they have no say in any matters and are just rentamouths.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this a private car-park if so when the owners rejected your appeal they should have sent you a POPLA number have you had this yet if not ask for it asap and appeal to them...

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its an IPC member MM

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mikeymack2002

 

 

It is a private land carpark,

 

 

Link Parking do not seem to be listed on the POPLA list of member companies.

 

 

They did not send me a number, just referred me to the IAS.

 

 

Should they still have sent me a number even if I can't find them listed in the POPLA directory?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's also not a fine, so stop thinking it is.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

so to reiterate, ignore anything that isnt a lba. You may well get a letter from Gladstones Solicitors on behalf of the company. If you do write back to them telling them that as you paid to park there is no debt to them or anyone they represent and they should stop abusing their position as the mouthpiece of the IPC and misusing your data.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Did you receive a letter before action not less than 14 days ago stating that it was such a letter under civil procedure regs?

 

Who has signed off the claim,

Link parking or a solicitor?

 

Have you checked the claim number to see if it a real claim or is ita form that hasnt been actually issued by the courts

and if it is the latter then a complaint to the SRA if sent by a solictor would be a wise move.

 

In the meanwhile acknowledge the claim and tick the box saying you intend to defend in full, do not accept mediation so dont tick that box.

 

If you ack the service of the N1 then you have a further 28 days plus some service time to post a defence.

 

 

It does not have to be a full defence at the moment but something simple like the defendant paid the prescribed fee

and displayed a receipt for payment so no breach of contract occurred.

 

 

I would also ask the local council planning dept if they granted planning permission for the signage at the site

under the 2007 Town and Country planning regs concerning advertising display signs.

 

 

If they havent got PP thentheir signs are there illegally and no contract can ever be formed, even if you wanted to.

Tell us exactly what has occurred since your last posting and tell us what exactly the claim says so we can help further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ericsbrother, thanks for your help. I had a letter from Link saying the charge had risen to £100, Gladstones worte asking for £150 or they would recover the money through Court, yesterday I recived the Small Claims Court papers asking for £226.94!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then post up the particulars of claim and fire off the letter to Link demanding proof of assignment from the landowner

to make claims and take civil action in their own name and

also for proof of planning permission being granted for their signage under the Town and Country Planning regs of 2007.

 

 

As said, get on to the local council and ask them yourself as if no planning permission then the signs are there illegally

and no contract can ever be formed, even if you wanted to.

 

acknowledge service within 12 days, tick boxes saying defending in full and no mediation

and then get the above letter off under CPR 31.15 and

ask council by email so you get a written response you can print off.

 

 

If the council say no PP then tell Gladstones that you are defending on the basis of illegal signage

and will report Link for fraud by misrepresentation as them to the SRA for incitement to commit fraud

for they are not only the representatives of Link but also the IPC and they,

as the IAS should have obtained this information so themselves before making a wrong decision

and then encouraging their member to use their services to make a spurious claim to their own detriment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...