Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
    • Northmonk forget what I said about your Notice to Hirer being the best I have seen . Though it  still may be  it is not good enough to comply with PoFA. Before looking at the NTH, we can look at the original Notice to Keeper. That is not compliant. First the period of parking as sated on their PCN is not actually the period of parking but a misstatement  since it is only the arrival and departure times of your vehicle. The parking period  is exactly that -ie the time youwere actually parked in a parking spot.  If you have to drive around to find a place to park the act of driving means that you couldn't have been parked at the same time. Likewise when you left the parking place and drove to the exit that could not be describes as parking either. So the first fail is  failing to specify the parking period. Section9 [2][a] In S9[2][f] the Act states  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN fails to mention the words in parentheses despite Section 9 [2]starting by saying "The notice must—..." As the Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the Act,  it follows that the Notice to Hirer cannot be pursued as they couldn't get the NTH compliant. Even if the the NTH was adjudged  as not  being affected by the non compliance of the NTK, the Notice to Hirer is itself not compliant with the Act. Once again the PCN fails to get the parking period correct. That alone is enough to have the claim dismissed as the PCN fails to comply with PoFA. Second S14 [5] states " (5)The notice to Hirer must— (a)inform the hirer that by virtue of this paragraph any unpaid parking charges (being parking charges specified in the notice to keeper) may be recovered from the hirer; ON their NTH , NPE claim "The driver of the above vehicle is liable ........" when the driver is not liable at all, only the hirer is liable. The driver and the hirer may be different people, but with a NTH, only the hirer is liable so to demand the driver pay the charge  fails to comply with PoFA and so the NPE claim must fail. I seem to remember that you have confirmed you received a copy of the original PCN sent to  the Hire company plus copies of the contract you have with the Hire company and the agreement that you are responsible for breaches of the Law etc. If not then you can add those fails too.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Euro Car Parks - Illegal tickets??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4904 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 190
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You have to put yourself in their shoes for a moment. If this was your only means of making a living living, would you:

 

a) Uphold a reasonable appeal and deprive yourself of money?, or

b) Reject any appeal, however justified, and hope that the victim pays up?

 

Once you look at things in that light, you soon see the futility of appealing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i see what you mean, i was more interested if people thought it may have stood considering the weather conditions and the inability to see any marked bays

 

Well the charge can never 'stand' because it's legally unenforceable.

 

If you mean would they have cancelled it, no. They'd just write back with some rubbish about terms and conditions and how you should have swept the snow away or some such pap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a letter from Euro Car Parks claiming I failed to pay the parking fine £30 and now it goes upto £50. Claims I was in the Sainsburys car park in Potters Bar.

 

1 Don't Shop @ Sainsburys

2 Never been in that car park

3 Was actually in my car just off the Edgeware Road London delivering documents for a Solicitors

 

Do I communicate with them or just ignore

 

I have complained to the Store and Sains head office but neither were interested and the said car park doesn't have any cameras

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a letter from Euro Car Parks claiming I failed to pay the parking fine £30 and now it goes upto £50. Claims I was in the Sainsburys car park in Potters Bar.

 

1 Don't Shop @ Sainsburys

2 Never been in that car park

3 Was actually in my car just off the Edgeware Road London delivering documents for a Solicitors

 

Do I communicate with them or just ignore

 

I have complained to the Store and Sains head office but neither were interested and the said car park doesn't have any cameras

 

Just ignore, and it's not a fine!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, could someone help me as i took my mother in law down to the town centre we parked in a euro car park and displayed her disabled badge when we came back there was a ticket on our windscreen when we enquired we were told that they do not provide disabled parking , i have refused to pay now i have received a letter from a debt collection agency, should i take them all the way or pay up, thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi should i pay a ticket that was issued to me tho i had my disabled badge when queried was told they didnt provide disabled parking, now with debt collecting agency, should i pay or not, thanks

 

Do not confuse debt collecting agencies with bailiffs. Debt collectors are just private citizens with no more power to collect money from people than you or I. They cannot enter your property, they cannot seize goods and they cannot blacken your credit record. If they do turn up at your door then ask them to leave. What form of words you use is entirely up to you! If they refuse to leave then call the police.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, I posted on a thread regarding LDK security. Can I assume that these people are the same bracket?

 

I am contemplating ringing them tomorrow basically to say that they hold a photo of the car and it is clearly on public land, meaning they shouldn't have bothered anyway.

 

I know people are saying I should stand firm but as a student it's my mother who is the registered keeper of the car and she is a little apprehensive about taking this path and wants to just pay up.

 

I've heard on another forum if you ring them up, tell them you're willing to go the distance/court, they will give it up as a good will gesture?

 

Edit: I'd also like to hear if there are any downsides to trying this?? People say not to bother and just ignore them, but surely it's worth trying on the off chance something good comes of it? Is there any reason I shouldn't ring?

I'm really just looking for some reassurance and clear, proven, advice because it's all very easy saying don't pay but when you start getting letters threatening court action it becomes alot scarier!

 

Please help/advise.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't reason with [problematic]. They don't care what you say, it won't change anything. They just send out junkmail and wouldn't be very good at their job if they gave up following a phone call or letter. They love it when you contact them because they know their letters are reaching someone.

 

Debt collection threats aren't scary. Anyone who has moved rented house has to wade through letters threatening court in the hallway when they come back from work!

 

Show your mum these letterchains so she can see the [problem] in action:

 

Euro Car Parks Letterchain

NCP Letterchain

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the parking [problematic]' means of income. Therefore if they were to allow an appeal they deprive themselves of money. On that basis, I'm sure you can guess just how many appeals they allow ;) The only people who usually advise you to appeal are the [problem] artists themselves, because they like to pretend that there is an air of legitimacy surrounding their industry :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife managed to get a Euro Car Parks ticket stuck on the car in December 09 by parking outside of Sainsbury's. She didn't notice the Euro Car Park signs and had parked in a disabled bay near the entrance. She didn't know there was parking enforcement in operation. If she had known she could have put disabled badges on display but didn't. She wasn't stopping anyone else from parking either side as it was unusually quiet at the time and there were lots of other spaces available. When she returned to the car a ticket was on it saying she had been parked there for five minutes without displaying a disabled badge. The ticket was for £50 or £30 if paid within 21 days. I read this forum at the time so we decided to ignore them. 23 days later came the letter saying the amount had been increased to £50 for not paying within 21 days. Recently we've had another letter from Control Account plc increasing the amount to £79.38 and threatening to obtain judgement against her. They state such a course of action may adversely affect your credit rating and would include costs, court fees and interest which may disproportionately increase the amount outstanding. The letter insisted on a phone call to them with 5 days or immediate payment by return post. I assume that was just an attempt to frighten her into paying up. We intend to continue ignoring them and go to court if necessary. I have a question has anyone reading these threads ever heard of anyone being taken to court or having there credit file damaged or do these [problem] artists always give up?

Update 14/2/2010

We have now received another letter from Control Account PLC Stating the letter is their "notice of intention to make a civil claim against my wife". It states "this is your final chance to prevent litigation being commenced against you: if you ignore this warning then proceedings may commence and judgment will be sought". It then goes on to tell her how court costs, interest at 8% etc. etc will be added on. It then says if we still don't pay the bailiff's will be sent in to take our possesions and sell them plus a load of other ways they can forcefully take the money from us e.g attachment to earnings, charge upon our property etc.

Obviously this kind of letter would intimidate many but as for us they have just wasted another stamp.

Update 18/4/2010

I followed the advice on this site and ignored their threatening letters. I've heard nothing from them since ignoring their second letter.

Edited by Unbreakable Soul
I added some later information
Link to post
Share on other sites

They always give up. No chance of court.

 

Two letters from Control Account is the norm, then Euro give up.

 

Please take the time to express write and express your disgust to Sainsburys. Forward them copies of the letters and a copy of your disabled badge and inform them of the distress Euro's letters are causing. Inform them you will never be shopping there again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi, this is my first post but I'd like to say a big thank you to those members of the forum who gave me the reassurance that Euro Car Parks are just a worthless bunch of chancers, out for what they can get without any legal basis. I wonder how many poor Pensioners have been worried to death by the ever increasing threats that these people dish out and suffer real hardship to pay their so-called fines.

For that reason I could not resist phoning them up and telling them just what a worthless job they do, what a shower of sh*t they are and that they could go and swivel before they get any of my hard earned cash.

Harsh I know but it was quite satisfying, the sooner that everyone knows that this is just a [problem], the sooner these people will go out of business and make this Country a slightly better place to live in.

 

Regards to all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exploringofficer great minds think alike!. This is my post on MSE from this morning:-

 

"There is an article in the "Money" section of today's Times naming and shaming companies that target disabled and elderly people with their products, such as mobility scooters and adjustable beds. Perhaps private parking companies could be added to that list.

 

From reading on here it seems that some elderly people, when they receive private parking tickets, get really frightened with all that talk of court proceedings and bailiffs and pay up. This is because they grew up in a different era when you could usually trust the correspondence that dropped through your door, and there weren't all these sorts of scams around."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, 1st post here.....

I have been issued a ‘parking ticket’ by these fella’s too, but my incident is slightly different…….

We went to Manor Walks Shopping Centre in Cramlington on 27th Feb at 11:30 to visit the estate agents and do a bit of shopping at Sainsbury’s too. We left after about an hour and a half. We then returned (but as you can imagine, parked in a totally different part of the car park) later the same day around 16:00 as we popped into Argos to buy a few bits n’ bob’s for our children. Upon leaving I noticed a little ‘self sealing plastic bag’ stuck under the wiper. Personally I thought someone had damaged my car and left their details! however this was not the case!

After reading the ticket it said ‘Your vehicle was parked longer than the maximum period allowed’. I managed to locate the attendant and when I asked if he’d issued the ticket, he replied “No. The machine did”. I wanted to laugh at him sooo much but was seething at the ticket. I told him we’d left and returned but we got the reply so many have had in the past – Once the ticket is issued, there is nothing I can do’.

I have since written to them (before finding this forum) and provided receipts for both visits, so we’ll see what comes back.

For those who know the shopping centre will agree it is simply impossible to spend 4.5 hours in there!

Be rest assured I’ll update on here what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4904 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...