Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah I figured, unlikely I'll need credit anyway mortgage all paid off etc so I'll take that on the chin and learn from the experience. Probably would've beaten that too had I remembered the protocol, first time ever going through the process though sob it wasn't familiar to me  Oh well  
    • This is my slightly amended WS taking on board your previous comments, any suggestions for amendments would be most appreciated.  Thank you for you time.   1.        I am the Defendant in this matter. 2.        The facts in this statement come from my personal knowledge. 3.        I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020. 4.        The alleged Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address. 5.        The Judgement debt was not familiar to me so I began investigations to ascertain what the debt related to and how such a figure had been equated in any event. 6.        I made immediate contact with the Court, the Claimant Solicitors and the Claimants thereafter, asking them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.  7.        I sent a Data Subject access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided – See appendix 1 which details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclaycard as well as copies of correspondence between us. 8.        I do not admit to entering an agreement with Barclaycard in 2000. 9.       The claimant has failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis and therefore this claim should be automatically struck out.  10.    The claimants have failed to disclose a true executed copy of the original agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim. They are not entitled to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974 12.   The reconstituted standard Barclaycard agreement that the claimant has included in the court bundle does not satisfy any CCA request and so the claimant is and remains in default of my CCA request and therefore unable to enforce the alleged agreement. 13.  The claimants have failed to provide proof the assignment, such as a deed of assignment. 14.  The claimant has failed to provide a statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement 15.   Despite numerous requests to the claimant, I have still not seen any evidence, such as an original agreement or deed of assignment, that substantiates the claimant’s assertion that I owe the debt to the claimant, nor evidence of how the debt was accrued. 16.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
    • A set aside application costs £275 which is more than the judgement so not worth it. Not that they would grant a set aside anyway.  Set asides are granted, for example, to people who moved and didn't get the court papers, so have a genuine reason for not defending.  Forgetting doesn't count. Your only choices are to pay up within 30 days, or defy the court and not pay.  If the latter, we've never seen a PPC enforce judgement for a single ticket, ever, you would get away without paying - but you would have a CCJ and a knackered credit file for six years.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Housing benefit & dealing with 2 estates & ESA claim in support group


Rich44
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3280 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I'll try to do this briefly. Nov wife's aunt died, December MIL died, my wife is administrator of both estates

 

There was about £7,000 of life insurance paid out, which went into a new bank account in my wife's name. In the meantime I left my job 31st Dec due to poor health I have now been put into the support group for 3 years for income based ESA (without an assessment BTW)

 

We declared the money in the bank account to the district council and sent copies of the death certificates to prove that's what the money was for. There is way more debt than cash so been trying to talk to all creditors to reach an amicable resolution, unfortunately most of the creditors have ignored her letters (worst was Argos refusing to talk to her at all and sending out default notices to the MIL address). So we haven't been able to pay them because of this so the money is sitting in wife's new bank account.

 

Thought no more of it because we'd done the right thing and told the council immediately when we started a housing benefit claim in January.

 

Today had a letter stopping our housing benefit primarily because they claim im now receiving contributions based ESA (i'm not confirmed by DWP THREE times!!) and also they want to count the MIL estate as OUR money and reduce our housing benefit and council tax benefit accordingly.

 

Is this correct? I know it looks like the money is ours because of this new account with the money in but I can clearly demonstate it's not but we can't get rid of it due to ongoing negotiations.

 

County council has accepted that we're on IB ESA as given the kids free school meals, DWP say we're on IB ESA but district council won't accept it.

 

So I suppose questions are:

 

1. Is there really no way of handling the estate money without it affecting us?

2. How can I get the council to accept that we get IB ESA so I shouldn't have to fill out another 30 odd page form, plus produce ID, bank statements and travel 25 mile round trip to visit them?

 

Thanks for reading this far, apologies if it's in the wrong place or if i've rambled on stress like this makes me really really ill on top of my usual "problems"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry been ill again. All the money is in separate accounts in my wife's name. We sent death certs, insurance payout letters etc, we told them the estates are bankrupt as more debt than anything (found a credit card for FOUR THOUSAND POUNDS for a lady on benefits, totally shocked by that)

 

Anyway despite all that council say they will count it against us as our money, it's over the £6000 threshold unfortunately, I just can't believe this is the first time this has come up & there's no way around it, really upset.

 

We lived next door and spent twenty mins doing cpr before ambulance arrived then had to deal with ICU etc before switching stuff off, never thought this would turn into such a nightmare too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again. I'm sorry you're going through this.

 

I still wonder if it's worth opening a bespoke executors' account. Here's a website that may be able to shed some light on some of the problems you have around the estate. Their helpline is free and they're good.

 

http://www.bereavementadvice.org/

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not an expert in these things, but assuming that the council has made an outcome decision that you're not entitled to HB (or that your payment should be reduced) because of this money, I would be looking to request a Mandatory Reconsideration and possibly, if necessary, a formal appeal. The argument would be that while your wife may temporarily have the money in her account, she is not the "beneficial owner" of the capital as it belongs to the deceased's estate and ultimately, to its creditors.

 

I think Honeybee's suggestions are good - if possible, move the money to another account where it will be clearer that it isn't yours to spend as you wish, and look for advice from organisations which deal with these sorts of matters. You want to make it obvious that this money is not an inheritance or windfall.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks I will mention that to them, we specifically opened a new account so that the 2 estates didn't go anywhere near our joint account because I could see this coming. What really annoys me is we told them about that account, sent bank statements etc to be totally honest as didn't want to be accused of anything and they accepted the claim back in January and we're only hearing about them getting huffy now. Find it incredible how disorganised etc they are.

 

We're going to try and get into overdrive tomorrow. Going to get bankers drafts made up offer all creditors 50% which is going to be the most any of them get. At least with bankers drafts the money is out of the account instantly unlike with sending them a personal cheque. We've got 4 weeks to send the new claim in so I think the easiest way out is just going to be pull our fingers out and get rid of the money. If common sense isn't going to apply then seems the only other way.

 

There's a few hundred spare from one relatives estate so we said they'd want that donated to an animal charity so we'll get that done as well.

 

Very stressful esp as Nationwide (the £4,000 credit card) have been a nightmare they set themselves up as preferential creditor by seizing all the money in the current account to pay themselves. Got that sorted after threatening them with ombudsman and suggested what they were doing was illegal they backed down pretty quick then.

 

Thanks for suggestions esp re the bank account glad to see we had the right idea with that in the first place.

 

I might try and speak to a different person at the council tomorrow and ask why I need to make a new claim given I am in receipt of income related ESA a "passport" benefit as they call it....

 

Dealt with this on Friday phoning DWP and council etc and then had to go to bed at 2pm because I felt so ill and then spent the next 24 hours being sick. Just can't handle being put in situations like that makes me so ill.

 

Oh well at least phoning DWP I found out my ESA support group award is for 3 years so that's a huge relief esp without having a WCA which I was terrified of.

 

Thanks all, lets see what tomorrow brings....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Antone is absolutely right, it is not your wife's money.

 

Open an account that is named "The Estate of XXX"

 

Without being rude, does your wife know what she is doing in dealing with the estate? That you, effectively, declared the money as your own suggests not.

 

Who are the beneficiaries under the intestacy rules?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We DIDN'T declare the money as ours! We told the council the whole story Inc bank statements, death certificates, insurance payout letter & all the letters from solicitors because we didn't want the council to go snooping and find this money and end up with an interview under caution.

 

We were being upfront & truthful with the council because we didn't think they'd say it was our money when it isn't.

 

Tried opening an account as above but only bank nearby is Santander and they wouldn't/couldn't do so.

 

As for knowing what we're doing, no worse than anyone else does when asked to do so. There's no property involved just £10K of capital, funeral costs (paid already) and the rest taken up by debts to be paid.

 

Not really interested in a debate about settling the estate no offence intended but just wanted advice in relation to the COUNCIL claiming the money is ours NOT us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just wanted advice in relation to the COUNCIL claiming the money is ours

 

About all I can suggest is contacting your council councillors and MP to make representations on your behalf. It might also pay to contact the press (I've found the Guardian to be helpful in the past, even if it was only an ear willing to listen).

 

To be honest, I don't see that opening an executors account and transferring the funds will help. The council may well look upon it as "deprivation of capital" despite it never being yours in the first place.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some anonymous back room decision maker has (apparently) already decided that the funds held in the existing, separate account are for the benefit of the OP. Opening up an account in the name of "The Estate of XXX" (an executors account) is unlikely to reverse the opinion of the DM. Once the elections are out of the way, getting the local councillors to intervene may be the best way to get this problem resolved.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I'll try to do this briefly. Nov wife's aunt died, December MIL died, my wife is administrator of both estates

 

There was about £7,000 of life insurance paid out, which went into a new bank account in my wife's name. In the meantime I left my job 31st Dec due to poor health I have now been put into the support group for 3 years for income based ESA (without an assessment BTW)

 

We declared the money in the bank account to the district council and sent copies of the death certificates to prove that's what the money was for. There is way more debt than cash so been trying to talk to all creditors to reach an amicable resolution, unfortunately most of the creditors have ignored her letters (worst was Argos refusing to talk to her at all and sending out default notices to the MIL address). So we haven't been able to pay them because of this so the money is sitting in wife's new bank account.

 

Thought no more of it because we'd done the right thing and told the council immediately when we started a housing benefit claim in January.

 

Today had a letter stopping our housing benefit primarily because they claim im now receiving contributions based ESA (i'm not confirmed by DWP THREE times!!) and also they want to count the MIL estate as OUR money and reduce our housing benefit and council tax benefit accordingly.

 

Is this correct? I know it looks like the money is ours because of this new account with the money in but I can clearly demonstate it's not but we can't get rid of it due to ongoing negotiations.

 

County council has accepted that we're on IB ESA as given the kids free school meals, DWP say we're on IB ESA but district council won't accept it.

 

So I suppose questions are:

 

1. Is there really no way of handling the estate money without it affecting us?

2. How can I get the council to accept that we get IB ESA so I shouldn't have to fill out another 30 odd page form, plus produce ID, bank statements and travel 25 mile round trip to visit them?

 

Thanks for reading this far, apologies if it's in the wrong place or if i've rambled on stress like this makes me really really ill on top of my usual "problems"

 

To be fair to the council, what you have done gives every suggestion that the money is yours and is an inheritance.

 

How are they expected to know what you are doing with a new account in your wife's name and a death certificate?

 

Has she applied for probate yet? That would be evidence that it is not in fact hers.

 

I agree that it will not how help transfering it to an Executors account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I am confused, not sure if life insurance relates to aunt or mother-in-law

 

I am definitely no expert on life insurance, but to my knowledge...

 

Life insurance is different from the deceased person's estate

 

Life insurance usually has a named beneficiary, and the money received belongs to the named beneficiary. In which case, it is not subject to probate, does not go into the estate and does not have to be used to pay off the deceased person's debts.

 

Where it gets more complicated is where there is no named beneficiary or the named beneficiaries are dead. In this case, it will depend upon the insurance policy and company.

In some cases, they may pay directly to next of kin and it is treated in the same way as if paid to a named beneficiary above.

In other cases, they may pay directly to the estate, in which case it is subject to probate and deceased person's debts.

 

I think your starting point is to clarify on what basis it was paid?

  • 1) named beneficiary
  • 2) next of kin
  • 3) estate

 

The insurance company should be abe to provide this information

If it is 1 or 2, the money is your partner's, the Council are probably right, but you do not have to use money to pay off debts.

If it is 3, the Council are wrong, but your wife will have to use the money to pay off the deceased person's debts.

  • Haha 1

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...