Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Unsure what would be classed as appeal I first contacted the applicant then IAS. I am not aware I could appeal again as Bank state I was informed that is news to me. I would have to look through the paper work, I apologise I forget so much due to my caring duties wish I had quality time to get so much done. Will try and look tomorrow, appreciate everyone's time and input.
    • Regular savings accounts are accounts designed for savers who put money aside every month and reward them with a generous interest rate.View the full article
    • Hi, I've been reading the invaluable advice on this forum and reading about the problems with Evri and lost delivery of items.  From what I gather the initial steps after having exhausted every's own lost item claim process is to draft a Letter of Claim, I think it is called and to register with the government Money Claims.  I have got a login for Money Claims and have made an initial stab at the letter but I'm not certain I have got it right. Am I right to assume that having exhausted Evri customer service's claims process and having received the denial of any compensation because the laptop I was sending is on the non-compensatory list that my next step would be to send the Letter of Claim to them? Let me provide some basic details which I hopefully have addressed in the letter. I purchased a laptop through Amazon.co.uk which a business in Belfast sold refurbished laptops through.  They had a 30 day money back guarantee for a full refund if you have any issues with the laptop.  I have the invoice from Amazon showing the purchase.  On 27 April, 2024 before the end of the 30 day period I used their ParcelShop (inside a Tesco) to send the laptop back and have the tracking reference mentioned in the letter.  As mentioned in the letter there was they advised they could not give me or sell me any insurance because laptops are on the non-compensatory list so I just paid the normal delivery cost.  It was scanned as leaving the ParcelShop on 29 April and the tracking has been like that ever since.  After a 28 working day Evri claim process they gave the expected response that they could not provide any compensation and simply could not proceed with my claim. I was hoping to get some advice on whether I go ahead now and email this to Customer Services straightaway and should I send a hard-copy to the Evri address as well?  Or are there any steps I have missed out on first?  I believe 14 days is the reasonable period of time for them to respond so if I were to send it tomorrow, for example 12 June then I should expect a reply by 26 June, is that correct and fair?  And assuming they don't reply with a full refund then I would then go down the government Money Claims site to proceed with that? Sorry for all the questions, I want to make sure I go about it properly.  I'll continue to read through other cases on here so I can get an even better handle on the process. I attached a LOC, happy for any edits or updates that will make it even better. Thanks so much for anyone's help! Regards, Matt Evri letter of claim.docx
    • The date was 3 June. Get on MCOL now. The legal principle is that, even if you defence is late, if the other party hasn't requested judgement, then your defence takes priority and is accepted. You might be in time. When I say now I mean now.  Recently we had someone who was nine days' late and this was pointed out to them at 5:30pm.  They faffed around till 11pm.  When they went on MCOl they saw that judgement had been entered at 7pm. Every minute is vital. File the below standard defence if you still can - 1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of [motor vehicle]. 2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.    4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.  6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Hi friends,  I’m a bit worried I may have got confused with timings here. I thought I had 33 days from my acknowledgment to submit a defence but the date added above says 3/6/24.   have I missed the date?   if so how can I apply for an exception due to my disability and problems with deadlines and dates etc (ADHD)?   what should I submit as a defence?   I’ve had no reply from BW so far    just been back on MCOL and it says 28 days from service if I completed an acknowledgment of service so does that mean 28 days from that of acknowledgement (I.e. 16/5) which would make deadline for defence 14/6?   Thanks! Panicking here.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arnold Clark's Error Leading To Reposession


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3332 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

last month we purchased a vehicle from Arnold Clark and part ex'd our own vehicle.

 

 

Prior to agreeing to buy we made the salesman aware that I only had a provisional license and asked would that be a problem with the finance

(my wife would be the main driver until I pass my test with me driving it provisionally.).

The salesman said that wont be a problem, the vehicle just has to be comprehensively insured.

 

We submitted all information for a credit check and we received a call the next day from the salesman that the finance had been accepted

and asked if we could come in to sign the agreement and pay the deposit.

 

 

We did so and the salesman said everything was fine, the car was signed over to us and we supplied all the documents that we were asked for.

We collected the car a couple of days later and left our vehicle with them.

 

A couple of weeks later AC called me to say they needed proof of comprehensive insurance where I was the main policy holder.

I said I dont have that because my wife is the main policy holder and I am a named driver.

 

 

AC said that the finance company wont release the money to them until they have proof that I am a main policy holder

and that the car would have to be repossessed if we cannot.

 

 

I informed him that on my copy of the finance agreement it only states that the vehicle has to be comprehensively insured,

it doesn't say that the owner has the be the main policy holder.

He said "yes but that doesnt matter because on the new document from the finance company it says you need to be the main policy holder".

 

They are threatening repossession if I dont pay for comprehensive insurance in my name

which firstly we cannot afford to do that and secondly out of principal of the agreement.

 

 

The funny thing is they said the finance company are threatening repossession and I said

"so a finance company who has currently made no investment in this vehicle has the right to take my car away."

to which AC said that

"well not it would need to be returned to us"

to which I replied

"so AC will repossess the vehicle?"

 

 

and after umm and arring they would not give me a straight answer as to who would be repossessing the car.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated and if they can repossess where do I stand with my deposit and part ex'd car?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can bet your life the finance company 'aren't' threatening repossession, that is a bit they tagged on to frighten you because they made a cock up.

 

Ring the finance company and tell them exactly what was agreed with AC and ask their advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I haven't but on speaking with Arnold Clark on the phone they have used two different names for the finance company that they are dealing with which is odd

 

Stay off the phone unless you can record the calls in writing only

If i have helped in any way hit my star.

any advice given is based on experience and learnt from this site :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, that's not right. I was informed in no uncertain manner that their salesmen are fully trained, so an error could not be of their making. LOL LOL

Have you considered telling them that you will return the car once your deposit, in full, has been returned, along with your old car.

This way you would be completely clear of that dire outfit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, that's not right. I was informed in no uncertain manner that their salesmen are fully trained,.

 

 

You come up with some cracking jokes Scania ;)

 

 

Plus, if they haven't paid AC yet, how can they repossess something that doesn't belong to them ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had been promised a call from the sales manager today but despite calling for her twice I'd not been able to speak with her directly,

only a receptionist telling me that she is trying her best to deal with it and will call as soon as she has sorted it.

 

 

From the moment we signed those papers AC have been absolutely useless and fobbing us off at every turn.

And now they won't speak to us because they have to admit that they messed up.

 

 

We're not demanding money back or after compensation we just want to be able to pay our monthly payments and keep the car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah good old Arnold Clark make a maladministration error but its the customers fault and they only discuss things on the phone in the hope the customer doesnt record calls so will therefore have no proof of what was discussed.

 

STOP talking to these people on the phone (unless you can record the call) you want a good paper trail as it seems that you are only dealing with the dealership you purchased the car from so are more than likely trying to keep their maladministration error in house so Head Office is unaware of this problem.

 

Make a Formal Complaint in writing to the Arnold Clark Dealership and send copies of the letter to Arnold Clarks Head Office and the Finance Company, also ask the dealership to confirm the full details of the Finance Company and to confirm that they still have your Part Exchange vehicle.

 

Ensure to keep copies of all letters and get free proof of posting from the post office you need to keep a good paper trail

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update from AC.

They have found a new finance company and they want me to go in to sign the documents. They explicitly said on the phone (which I have recorded) "you do not own this car". I will go into to look at the papers but as far as I'm concerned I do own this car. Have they just dropped a ball and realised they've given me a car for free and they can't actually take the direct debit payments without backing from a finance company? They want me to come in tonight and I've said I can't as im busy but will try tomorrow, the guy sounded very frustrated. I'm not trying to get this car for free, I am happy for the payments to go out my bank based on the agreement already signed, I just don't know if i have to sign a NEW finance agreement with another finance company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check the interest rate and the terms and conditions before you sign

 

 

It could be this one has a much higher interest rate so AC gets a bigger commission. The whole thing could've been a set up from the beginning.

Of course he's frustrated, he don't get his sales bonus until you sign.

 

 

Ring the original finance company now and see what they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they just walked into my place of work, with a new finance agreement, they demanded I signed, I took the document but said I will read it first and the guy went away. Another person called and said it will be reposessed if it's not signed by tonight. I just need to know can it be reposessed at this point without written warning?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's up to you mate, but I know what I would be doing in your circumstances. If you sign this it will mean your signature is on two legally enforceable documents!!!!!!!! Do yourself a favour and get rid. If this is how they treat you just now, imagine if you have a complaint with the car----what chance would you have with them????? Get out whilst you can.

 

 

PS. If you do decide to stay in this deal, make ABSOLUTELY SURE the finance is straight HP---not a personal loan or a "Car Loan" by Santander.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...