Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot/reston got CCJ on already SB'd - *** Struck Out with Costs Successfully Executed by HCEO***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3061 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry if I have the wrong forum.

 

In 2001 I had a Brantano Card via Creation.

in 2003 I had a business failure and told them I couldn't pay anything.

They left me alone and to be honest, they never came back to me.

 

 

Time went on and I received a letter from Lowell in May 2014,

I wrote back with the template letters from this site,

the CCA proof £1,

S10 form £10 for Account etc.

I heard nothing back.

 

 

in August, the same from Red,

again I sent the two letters with postal orders,

all via registered post. Then nothing.

 

 

November I had the same again from Fredericks, again, I sent the same.

 

 

I had not sent the Statue Barred letters as I wanted to see whether they could produce anything.

 

Then a problem. I got the same from Cabot,

I sent a letter telling them of the above and that I was not sending another £11 when nothing has been produced.

They ignored what I had sent, then passed it to their Solicitors, RESTONS.

who sent me a letter before action,

 

 

I was to answer it, but had a really bad accident in my wheelchair when crossing the road.

(a driver got fed up waiting, zoomed off catching my handle dragging me along the road.

I was being treated by the air ambulance on the road for three hours before five weeks in Hospital, three operations etc.)

 

 

I managed to access MCOL, said I had a defence, i,e. it was Statute Barred,

the debtors had not supplied anything proving I held an account with them,

apart from a internal printout showing a payment from £1.00 in April 2014 on the Account.

£1.00 that was what they paid for the debt.

 

I have since been recovering, got another operation in three weeks time and I am coping with the aftermath of the accident.

I have a Crown Court case to deal with, Police and all this compounds my other problems stemming from my disability.

 

Restons got judgement in default on the last few days in January.

I have just not been well enough to deal with anything,

now I have a Bailiff letter. Its taken three days just to write this out.

 

What can I do?

I stress, no payment has been made since 2003.

I would have defended the Court Claim had the Accident not happen.

Can I get a set aside, then look to dismiss the claim on the basis of Statute Barred?

 

Help and links to letters, court forms would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you can get it set aside

 

 

SB is a perfect reason.

 

 

so looks like they took one of your CCA £1PO's and put it against the debt

 

 

however that itself would have been outside of 6yrs I bet anyway!

 

 

N244 me thinks?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Upset

 

Restons got judgement in default on the last few days in January.

 

How...? did you acknowledge service?

 

You state you submitted a defence.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy, I was in hospital when the wife brought the letter in that was caught up in the Christmas post. I went online via my Ipad, acknowledged service, asked for the 28 days.

 

I believed that gave me until the 2nd Feb (28 days) which was ready to send, however, I have the judgment dated the 28th come in on the 29th.

 

At that time, I was in hospital with an arm in 16 pieces and other cuts and soft tissue damage (the car drove over me).

 

Hopefully you will understand I was not really in the frame of mind from that point. It may not be the right attitude, I am still suffering, but using voice typing software as my left arm is not quite usable.

 

The £1.00 on the account form that I was sent was when the DCA "paid" for the debt. The letters I sent, CCA & S10, had a paragraph on them that clearly stated that this money was not to be used to set against the account. That was also on the Postal Order that they all cashed.

 

How would I do the Set Aside? The format?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically you missed the defence date ? what date was on the claim form..this is the service date.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have submitted by the 24th latest (1 bank Holiday) claim date 22nd Dec 2014.......33 days

 

19 days to acknowledge the claim from and including the 23rd and a further 14 days to submit the defence.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have submitted by the 24th latest (1 bank Holiday) claim date 22nd Dec 2014.......33 days

 

19 days to acknowledge the claim from and including the 23rd and a further 14 days to submit the defence.

 

Andy

 

Yes, I understand the dates are out, but can I still get it set aside, then aim for a strike out?

 

Any help is really appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you can prove the debt was already sb'd at the issuing of the claimform

 

 

then yes you can get it set aside and nulled.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I completed the AOS,

did the defence thinking I had a bit more time than clearly I didn't.

 

 

I was in hospital at the time with a full cast on my arm and having treatment for my other injuries.

It was not the first thing on my mind,

I did have it done (as in written out with dates of the "alleged" account, dates of asking for proof,

and telling the first DCA it was Statute Barred with a notice to that affect).

I had every intention of filing it on what I thought at the time was the last day,

however, the day before the date I intended filing, I received the judgement.

 

I then had an operation on the 2nd, February on my arm, 18th February on my spine and elbow operation on the 7th March.

 

How do I lay out the form asking the Judge to set aside and strike out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you complete the AoS in time but not submit defence? What does the judgment order say as if you did the AoS then it could be an irregular judgment.

 

Not if the time as passed to submit the defence...irregular judgments are when the AoS has been completed and the claimant requests or the court awards default judgment within the 33 days.

 

Upset...if you are 100% sure that the debt was statute barred before the issuance of the claim then you need to complete the N244 and request an order that the claim be set a side pursuant to CPR 13.3 (a)

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part13

 

There is a fee to submit the application...the fees have just gone up so you need to check online.I would advocate opting without hearing in the first instance the court will advise if different.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

The dates above are correct, last contact was September 2003.

 

 

When I was contacted by Lowell Portfolio No.1. I'm looking at the letter telling them that it was Statute Barred, which they ignored of course.

 

 

I sent a CCA, SAR,

 

 

then S.10 letter with £10 PO.

 

 

It all went quiet, then

 

 

our months later I get the same letter sent by a company called Red.

 

 

Again, I did the same.

 

Thanks for your help.

 

JP

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Success!

 

Judge looked at my paper work train. Admonished the Reston's Trainee Paralegal (not got a clue what that is).

 

Set aside, struck out and gave an order that this shall not come before the Court again. (which I hope means will not get another set of threats from another collection agency)

 

Awarded my £155.00 fee back and awarded costs of the morning for me and my carer of £250.00 to be paid forthwith.

 

So, I suppose they were wrong then?

 

Thanks to everyone for their help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes great result!

 

 

teach ruddy restons a lesson.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Question is, how long do I let them have before sending in the Bailiff if they don't pay?

 

The Order will probably say 14 days.

 

It will cost you £100 to enforce it so probably not worth it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Delighted for you Upsetandfrustrated

 

If you do have to execute...you add the fee to the amount owed.

 

Well done.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

WOuld be funny to have to send in the bailiffs, esp if it could be filmed :D

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...