Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update! I emailed both Andrzej.Tuleja and James_Goldsmith at Whirlpool dot com. I got a phone call from their executive team a couple of days later, and a replacement part dropped on the mat a week after. She was quite apologetic, however, also reiterated the "90 day warranty" period on customer fitted parts, and did not comment when I mentioned that the CRA also applies as I was a consumer buying from them directly. So I now have a spare door switch if the machine decides to eat another in the future! Cheers all!   Note dx100 that the "Hotpoint CEO" you linked to is not related to the hotpoint appliances, but some kind of marketing app.
    • yep, throw that morality card out the window....9/10 you never owe a DCA ANYTHING!! they are NOT BAILIFFS!!
    • (See the link to DVLA’s INF188/6 document I posted above, page 4 as cited) “I have a new medical condition that I have told the DVLA about on my recent application. Can I drive? As soon as the DVLA receives your correct and complete application for a new licence and as long as you meet all the Section 88 criteria, you may drive. It is important that you are satisfied that the medical condition you have declared on your application does not stop you from driving. If you are unsure, check with your doctor or healthcare professional before you make a decision. You can also look up your condition in the ‘Assessing fitness to drive’ guide, which you can find at www.gov.uk/dvla/fitnesstodrive to see whether you meet the medical standards for driving. As this guide is intended for healthcare professionals, it can be complicated. Your doctor or healthcare professional should be able to help you if necessary." It seems that DVLA think that S.88 does apply for applications disclosing a new medical condition after all. Why might this be so, and what of “qualifying application" and "relevant disability"? S. 92(1) imposes on the driver a requirement to disclose a relevant disability. S.92(3) requires the Secretary of State to refuse such an application disclosing a relevant disability ….. EXCEPT S.92(4) requires the Secretary of State to grant such an application if the relevant disability is “adequately controlled”. Hence my belief S.88 can apply for medical conditions (if the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive) as the application remains a qualifying application IF the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive, until DVLA (on behalf of the Secretary of State) say it doesn’t, provided the driver believes they meet the (medical) standard. Additionally, at (or before) June 2013 (as noted in my previous post) the medical standard for fitness to drive for conditions involving excessive daytime sleepiness was changed from “completely controlled” to "adequately controlled".  
    • CFO Bill Guan allegedly led a team at the news outlet that was behind a global money laundering scheme.View the full article
    • Anyway, I've asked my Booking.com flat-rent-out-bloke what needs to be done on the Booking.com portal to cancel a reservation. I got a late message "I'll let you know tomorrow".
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Taking a Statement from a Minor


lewis94
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am sorry if this is in the wrong location and please move if necessary. Could some please explain if it is legal to take a statement from a child, concerning a bullying case, when no other adult is present with the child other than a so called child protection officer, and then get the said child who is under 18 to sign the document in front of that person? The main element of the concern is that there is no witness to the way in which the questioning was undertaken and if the statement is a true reflection of the conversation with the child - taking into account the adult who took the statement was convicted of fraud in 2009 and narrowly escaped a jail sentence there is concern that the statement may not be a true reflection of what was said. I am also concerned that potentially a child has been made to sign a document by the adult undertaking the questioning without any present to offer support or advice. Any help would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

A statement taken by a child protection officer who is known to falsify statements and has a history of fraud. The statement was taken in a changing room behind closed doors and with no other person present. The child is under 16s years of age.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're not giving enough information to answer you properly. What do you mean by 'Child Protection Officer'? Who do they work for? Is this the police? Some other official body? Is this a school? In your first post you say "no other adult is present with the child other than a so called child protection officer" which suggests two adults were present. Who was the other?

 

What age precisely? There's a big difference between a child being 5 and being 15.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry please excuse. The CPO works for a sports organisation and is signed up to the sports governing body, however they are never quick as responding to anything !!. The CPO and the child were the only two people in the room and no one else. The child I think is either 14 or 15

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CPO isnt registered with anyone but only takes the role as a voluntary position within the club. No DBS is held with the governing body either. Should i raise this with the local council?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have to be accompanies by a responsible adult. No ifs, no buts, no coconuts

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this cpo an official role or an individual within a private club that listed as some sort of complaints officer?

What is the issue? What sort of statement was taken? Is the child in trouble or accusing someone else? Has the child complained about the way the statement has been taken or are you complaining?

How does the fact the individual has been convicted of fraud relate to taking a Childs statement?

I know in alot of organisations, a single adult is used to initially interview a child so as to avoid intimidating or scaring the child. And there is not always multiple adults available to carry out the initial interview.

But again, too much of a lack of Info to comment more accurately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Age of legal responsibility is 11 Y/O.

 

If the CPO took a statement from them with no other witnesses present, then the statement will never hold any water in any 'legal' process.

CPO's like to think they are the Law, when in actual fact they know zero.

 

I would be making a direct complaint to the manager of the club, and also to this CPO's manager with a view of escalating the matter further.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which law says that? This a private sports club.

 

What does that have to do with anything?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

[ATTACH]56526[/ATTACH]Common sense....but I'm pretty sure if I could be bothered I could eek out the exact law.

 

If there is question of wrongdoing, then a CPO would need a witness to corroborate what the child said.

A signature won't do that. And I would be concerned about the methods this CPO used in gaining this useless 'statement' and signature, certainly sounds like the actions of unqualified and untrained officious member of the public IMO.

 

Lewis, you really do need to make a formal complaint to the club in question, and let them know you're not at all happy with the conduct of their staff, and you will escalate it beyond them if needs be.

 

So is this a youth club? Or similar?

Yes they are supposed to all have one of these Club CPO's, but it is clear this one, has no real knowledge of what her job entails by the sounds of it. and in any case she certainly doesn't sound as though she has the required ''core skills''.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back to lewis's actual question - " Could some please explain if it is legal to take a statement from a child, concerning a bullying case, when no other adult is present with the child other than a so called child protection officer" - as no-one can identify any relevant law that says otherwise I advise lewis to assume that what has been done is legal and no law requires requires a 'responsible adult' to be present (and neither the document attached by Bazooka nor the statutory guidance referred to in it make any such recommendation either). A sports club CPO isn't carrying out a criminal investigation or taking a statement for use in criminal proceeedings. And if it's "common sense" why don't schools do it (children can be, and regularly are, expelled from school without any independent responsible adult ever being present)?

 

That doesn't mean you can't complain to the club that you believe there should have been an independent adult present. JBut do not base your complaint on the CPO acting illegally. That would just let the club brush your complaint aside by telling you it was legal. And I strongly recommend that you do not muddy the waters of your complaint by referring to the CPO's previous conviction for fraud. (How do you know that by the way?).

 

Grumpy asks some good questions which it would be helpful to have more information on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where are the parents, or the legal guardian of the child in all of this, and who are you?

 

Sam

All of these are on behalf of a friend.. Cabot - [There's no CCA!]

CapQuest - [There's no CCA!]

Barclays - Zinc, [There's no CCA!]

Robinson Way - Written off!

NatWest - Written off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt there is any specific law which has been broken. There isn't a law which stops adults from speaking to children or from taking a note of what has been discussed. We are only talking about a sports club here; we are not talking about a statement given to a police officer or anything like that.

 

Of course, if the statement will be used for anything, the accuracy of the statement can be challenged. I do not think you would have a legal basis for disregarding the statement entirely.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for not getting back sooner. The complaint is one of bullying against a member of staff. So far nothing has been proved to the contrary and nothing is stacking up to support the claim, however the reputational damage to the person the complaint is about could be quite damaging. The CPO that took the statement has publically announced to others on numerous occasions the personal dislike for the person and has expressed her wishes on getting the person removed from the club. There has been accusations already that false claims have been made and other parents in the club have been contacted to generate stories about the person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go to the police then. If this individual os, as you say, making up false stories and libelous accusations, them its the police that need to be called in to investigate. Especially where children are concerns.

That said, have you seen all the relevant proof. Proof of the fraud conviction.

Proof the individual is on a mission to slander the other person?

Are you connected in any way to this or just someone looking in from the outside?

The child issue is something the authorities will look into if they investigate. The child would not have needed to be interviewed by more than one adult though in this scenario. The child is not being accused of anything and his, probably unsigned, statement would be given to the authorities if the club deem it necessary to investigate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick response. A number of other parents have started to get together as they do not like what is being said and what is happening. The case can be found on google and on local papers websites. I am trying to offer support as an impartial person to a very upset individual

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for not getting back sooner. The complaint is one of bullying against a member of staff. .

 

Now I'm confused. Presumably, from the rest of your posts, it isn't the child who was accused of bullying a member of staff so why was the child interviewed? Who are stories being made up about, and who is the CPO trying to get rid of? The child or another adult?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick response. A number of other parents have started to get together as they do not like what is being said and what is happening. The case can be found on google and on local papers websites. I am trying to offer support as an impartial person to a very upset individual

 

Perhaps you could provide a link to one of these local newspaper sites :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...